Flach, P. "Abduction and Induction: Syllogistic and Inferential Perspectives" in M. Denecker, L. De Raedt, P. Flach and T. Kakas (eds) Working Notes of the ECAI'96 Workshop on _Abductire and Inductive Reasonin pp. 7-9, 1996. Home/Search Document Details and Download
Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Subscription Information - Volume Bimonthly Full (Correct)
....for register lookup (# equalities) axioms for register update (# equalities) and an axiom of register extensionality (# equality) Section 4 proves that these axioms are sound and complete for standard models. The completeness proof uses a detour via general models along the lines of Friedman [8]. Section 5 extends the familiar ## reduction from typed logic to ##### reduction for TLS. Combining the fact that ##### reduction for TLS is strongly normalizing with the completeness theorem we get the rather surprising result that the relation = E = F is decidable. Section 6 adds equations ....
....with large enough base domains has the canonical model as a partial homomorphic image. Indeed, any equality that is true in a large enough full model will be true in the canonical term model. The situation is completely analogous to the case of the ordinary typed lambda calculus (see Friedman [8]) 5 Reducing TLS Expressions If R is a relation on the set of expressions of L # (a so called notion of reduction) then R determines a relation R # of one step R reduction in the following standard manner: E,E # ) #R E R # E E R # E ( FE) R # ( FE # ) E R # E ( EF) ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Peter Flach, `Abduction and induction: syllogistic and inferential perspectives', Proc. ECAI'96 Workshop on Abductive and Inductive Reasoning, pp. 31-35.
An AI criterion for an account of inference: How to realize a task - Öztürk (Correct)
....of diagnosis. Even though that the attempts to classifying these inference types have such a long history, the literature does not yet provide a commonly agreed upon classification. Peirce s early and late theories on inference have been referred to as syntactical and inferential perspectives [Flach 96] We also emphasize the change in Peirce s view and further analyse the underlying change in his motivations responsible for this change in his view. In our interpretation we will partly explain the tangled accounts in the literature by emphasizing the existence of rather different motivations ....
Flach, P. Abduction and Induction: Syllogistic and inferential Perspectives, in ECAI-96 Workshop on Abductive and Inductive reasoning, 1996.
Abductive and Inductive Reasoning: Report of the ECAI'96 Workshop - Flach, al. Self-citation (Flach) (Correct)
No context found.
Peter Flach, `Abduction and induction: syllogistic and inferential perspectives', Proc. ECAI'96 Workshop on Abductive and Inductive Reasoning, pp. 31-35.
Computational 'Consilience' as - Theory (Correct)
No context found.
Flach, P. "Abduction and Induction: Syllogistic and Inferential Perspectives" in M. Denecker, L. De Raedt, P. Flach and T. Kakas (eds) Working Notes of the ECAI'96 Workshop on _Abductire and Inductive Reasonin pp. 7-9, 1996.
A Formal Definition of Intelligence Based on an.. - Hernandez-Orallo, al. (1998) (Correct)
No context found.
Flach, P. "Abduction and Induction: Syllogistic and Inferential Perspectives" INFOLAB, Tilburg University 1995.
Constructive Reinforcement Learning - Hernandez-Orallo (1999) (Correct)
No context found.
P. Flach, "Abduction and Induction: Syllogistic and Inferential Perspectives" in M. Denecker, L. De Raedt, P. Flach and T. Kakas (eds) Working Notes of the ECAI'96 Workshop on Abductive and Inductive Reasoning, pp. 7-9, 1996.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC