Carey, S., Diamond, R., and Woods, B. (1980). Development of face recognition-a maturational component? Developmental Psychology, 16:257--269.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....under a wide range of unfamiliar conditions. Indeed, proficiency in face recognition appears to be, to a considerable extent, an acquired ability. Children s recognition of upright faces improves steadily from age 6 to 10, dips temporarily between ages 11 and 12, then climbs to an adult level (Carey et al. 1980). In comparison, recognition performance on inverted faces does not change throughout the life and remains significantly worse (Carey and Diamond, 1977; Carey et al. 1980) Moreover, subjects who, following training, successfully recognize inverted faces under fixed viewing conditions still ....

.... of upright faces improves steadily from age 6 to 10, dips temporarily between ages 11 and 12, then climbs to an adult level (Carey et al. 1980) In comparison, recognition performance on inverted faces does not change throughout the life and remains significantly worse (Carey and Diamond, 1977; Carey et al. 1980). Moreover, subjects who, following training, successfully recognize inverted faces under fixed viewing conditions still perform relatively poorly when required to generalize to a novel viewpoint or even a novel illumination (Moses et al. 1993) 1.2 Computational background 1.2.1 Related work ....

Carey, S., Diamond, R., and Woods, B. (1980). Development of face recognition-a maturational component? Developmental Psychology, 16:257--269.

....of the sex of the individual, 4 while the higher frequency components are used in recognition [Sergent, 1986] Young children typically recognize unfamiliar faces using unrelated cues, such as glasses, clothes, hats, and hair style. By age twelve, these paraphernalia are usually reliably ignored [Carey et al. 1980]. Psychosocial conditions also affect the ability to recognize faces. Humans may encode an average face; these averages may be different for different races, and recognition may suffer from prejudice or unfamiliarity with the class of faces from another race [Goldstein, 1979b] or gender ....

Carey, S., Diamond, R., and Woods, B. (1980). The development of face recognition---a maturational component? Developmental Psychology, 16:257--269.

....of the human visual system with upright faces in everyday life [4] Indeed, face recognition appears to be, to a considerable extent, an acquired ability. Children s recognition of upright faces improves steadily from age 6 to 10, dips temporarily at 11 Gamma 12, then climbs to an adult level [3]. In comparison, recognition performance on inverted faces does not change throughout the life and remains significantly worse [2, 3] 1.2 Computational approach Our approach to the problem of generalization from a single view is based on a formalization of the notions of class based processing ....

....extent, an acquired ability. Children s recognition of upright faces improves steadily from age 6 to 10, dips temporarily at 11 Gamma 12, then climbs to an adult level [3] In comparison, recognition performance on inverted faces does not change throughout the life and remains significantly worse [2, 3]. 1.2 Computational approach Our approach to the problem of generalization from a single view is based on a formalization of the notions of class based processing and of experience, outlined below. RF based representation. A basis for the similarity of face images must be provided before one ....

S. Carey, R. Diamond, and B. Woods. Development of face recognition-a maturational component ? Developmental Psychology, 16:257--269, 1980.

.... are given the chance to accumulate sufficient expertise in a few thousands of trials with this object class (Gauthier Tarr, 1997) Other evidence for the importance of expertise comes from developmental work indicating that the ability to remember new faces improves gradually until the age of 12 (Carey, Diamond Woods, 1980). This learning does not extend automatically even to sub categories of faces with which we may have less experience, e.g. faces of people of another race (Brigham, 1986) Further, the learning does not extend to inverted faces, which are comparable in complexity, contrast, and spectral content ....

Carey, S., Diamond, R. & Woods, B. (1980). Development of face recognition-a maturational component? Developmental Psychology, 16, 257--269.

....(e.g. the space spanned by properly chosen receptive fields) see section 1.2.1. appears to be, to a considerable extent, an acquired ability. Children s recognition of upright faces improves steadily from age 6 to 10, dips temporarily between ages 11 and 12, then climbs to an adult level (Carey et al. 1980). In comparison, recognition performance on inverted faces does not change throughout the life and remains significantly worse (Carey and Diamond, 1977; Carey et al. 1980) Moreover, subjects who, following training, successfully recognize inverted faces under fixed viewing conditions still ....

.... of upright faces improves steadily from age 6 to 10, dips temporarily between ages 11 and 12, then climbs to an adult level (Carey et al. 1980) In comparison, recognition performance on inverted faces does not change throughout the life and remains significantly worse (Carey and Diamond, 1977; Carey et al. 1980). Moreover, subjects who, following training, successfully recognize inverted faces under fixed viewing conditions still perform relatively poorly when required to generalize to a novel viewpoint or even a novel illumination (Moses et al. 1993) 1.2 Computational background 1.2.1 Related work ....

Carey, S., Diamond, R., and Woods, B. (1980). Development of face recognition-a maturational component? Developmental Psychology, 16:257--269.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC