Wiebe J. et al. 1996. ARTWORK: Discourse Processing in Machine Translation of Dialog. Technical Report MCCS96294, Computing Research Laboratory.  Home/Search   Document Details and Download   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....by actions that are executed with the goal of having some particular effect on the hearer. These actions are called speech acts. The task of an understanding system is to recognize which speech acts the speaker is performing with his or her utterances (Reithinger Maier 1995; Ros e et al. 1995; Wiebe et al. 1996). Consider the utterance 2 to 4 (dos a cuatro) a common type of utterance in the scheduling dialogs. The speaker might be suggesting that they meet from 2 to 4; they might be confirming that 2 to 4 is the time currently being discussed; they might, with the right intonation, be accepting 2 to ....

....of the original code were needed to considerably improve the speedups achieved, as discussed in the next subsection. Ambiguity in NLP gives rise to a combinatorial explosion of possible interpretations. Consequently, Artwork may take up to a couple of hours to process a dialog (Wiebe et al. 1996). Artwork offers a great deal of inherent parallelism to exploit, including orparallelism and both DAP and IAP. To process each utterance, the system applies all rules in its knowledge base. Each rule that matches the utterance fires, producing a partial representation. The rules are not all ....

Wiebe J. et al. 1996. ARTWORK: Discourse Processing in Machine Translation of Dialog. Technical Report MCCS96294, Computing Research Laboratory.

....by actions that are executed with the goal of having some particular effect on the hearer. These actions are called speech acts. The task of an understanding system is to recognize which speech acts the speaker is performing with his or her utterances (Reithinger Maier 1995; Ros e et al. 1995; Wiebe et al. 1996). Consider the utterance 2 to 4 (dos a cuatro) a common type of utterance in the scheduling dialogs. The speaker might be suggesting that they meet from 2 to 4; they might be confirming that 2 to 4 is the time currently being discussed; they might, with the right intonation, be accepting 2 to ....

....hand modifications of the original code were needed to considerably improve the speedups achieved, as discussed in the next subsection. Ambiguity in NLP gives rise to a combinatorial explosion of possible interpretations. Consequently, Artwork may take up to a couple of hours to process a dialog (Wiebe et al. 1996). Artwork offers a great deal of inherent parallelism to exploit, including orparallelism and both DAP and IAP. To process each utterance, the system applies all rules in its knowledge base. Each rule that matches the utterance fires, producing a partial representation. The rules are not all ....

Wiebe J. et al. 1996. ARTWORK: Discourse Processing in Machine Translation of Dialog. Technical Report MCCS96294, Computing Research Laboratory.

No context found.

Wiebe, J., Farwell, D., Villa, D., Chen, J-L, Sinclaire, R., OhrstromSandgren, T., Stein, G., Zarazua, D., & O'Hara, T. (1996). ARTWORK: Discourse processing in machine translation of dialog. Final technical report (3 rd year) MCCS-96-294 (Computing Research Lab, NMSU).

No context found.

Wiebe, J., Farwell, D., Villa, D., Chen, J-L, Sinclaire, R., Sandgren, T., Stein, G., Zarazua, D., & O'Hara, T. (1996). ARTWORK: Discourse processing in machine translation of dialog. Technical report MCCS-96-294(Computing Research Lab, NMSU).

....Horiguchi, Isotani, Lavie, Mayfield, Ros e, Van Ess Dykema Waibel, 1994) These dialogs are referred to here as the CMU dialogs. The algorithm was later tested on a corpus of Spanish dialogs collected under the Artwork project at New Mexico State University by Daniel Villa and his students (Wiebe, Farwell, Villa, Chen, Sinclair, Sandgren, Stein, Zarazua, O Hara, 1996). These are referred to here as the NMSU dialogs. In both cases, subjects were asked to set up a meeting based on schedules given to them detailing their commitments. The NMSU dialogs are face to face, while the CMU dialogs are like telephone conversations. The participants in the CMU dialogs ....

Wiebe, J., Farwell, D., Villa, D., Chen, J.-L., Sinclair, R., Sandgren, T., Stein, G., Zarazua, D., & O'Hara, T. (1996). Artwork: Discourse processing in machine translation of dialog. Tech. rep. MCCS-96-294, Computing Research Laboratory, New Mexico State University.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC