Y Rechter and T Li. An Architecture for IP Address Allocation with CIDR RFC 1518. http://sunsite.auc.dk/RFC/rfc/rfc1518.html, 1993. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Faster IP Lookups using Controlled Prefix Expansion - Srinivasan, Varghese (1998) (36 citations) (Correct)
....designs use a general purpose processor; others use dedicated hardware. 3 a form of output scheduling that guarantees tight delay bounds 1 organizations further structured their Class B addresses ( subnetting ) for internal routing. Finally, Class B addresses began to run out. The CIDR scheme[RL93] now gives new organizations multiple contiguous Class C addresses that can still be aggregated by a common prefix, which reduces backbone router table size. The forces of subnetting and CIDR supernetting have led to the use of prefixes for the Internet. Best matching prefix is also used in the ....
Y Rechter and T Li. An Architecture for IP Address Allocation with CIDR RFC 1518. http://sunsite.auc.dk/RFC/rfc/rfc1518.html, 1993.
Optimal Routing Table Design for IP Address Lookups Under.. - Cheung, McCanne (1999) (13 citations) (Correct)
....Because of this, every router need not have a routing table entry for every possible network destination. Instead, addressspace hierarchy can be exploited to achieve address aggregation whereby a large collection of hosts can be addressed as a single entity via a variable length network address [3]. For example, all of the hosts at U.C. Berkeley can be referred to simply as 128.32 16 because they all have the same 16 bit prefix of 128.32 . As a result, routers have much smaller routing tables and the problem of searching this table for a given route on a per packet basis is simplified. ....
Y.Rechter and T.Li, An Architecture for IP Address Allocation with CIDR RFC 1518. http://sunsite.auc.dk/RFC/rfc/rfc1518.html, 1993.
Fast Address Lookups using Controlled Prefix Expansion - Srinivasan, Varghese (1999) (17 citations) (Correct)
....hosts were given class B addresses; these organizations further structured their Class B addresses ( subnetting ) for internal routing. Finally, Class B addresses began to run out. Thus larger organizations needed multiple Class C addresses. To reduce backbone router table size, the CIDR scheme [Rechter and Li 1993] now allocates larger organizations multiple contiguous Class C addresses that can be aggregated by a common prefix. In summary, the forces of subnetting and CIDR supernetting have led to the use of prefixes for the Internet. While the currently deployed IPv4 protocol uses 32 bit addresses, the ....
Rechter, Y. and Li, T. 1993. An Architecture for IP Address Allocation with CIDR RFC 1518.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC