6 citations found. Retrieving documents...
P. Mockapetris. Domain Names - Implementation and Specification. RFC 1035, Internet Network Working Group, November 1987.

 Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check  

This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Windowed Key Revocation in Public Key Infrastructures - McDaniel, Jamin (1998)   (1 citation)  (Correct)

....verifier specifying from which keyserver it wishes to retrieve the certificate. 4 It is worth noting that we do not specify a mechanism for locating the enterprise root node of an external enterprise. There are several existing designs for scalable network directory services, such as DNS [Moc87a, Moc87b]. These services are readily available within today s Internet infrastructure, and as such are beyond the scope of this paper. We illustrate the retrieval process through an example in Figure 3. Assume all nodes initially have empty caches, save the permanent entries. We state that the enterprise ....

P. Mockapetris. Domain Names - Implementation and Specification. RFC 1035, Internet Network Working Group, November 1987.


Windowed Key Revocation in Public Key Infrastructures - McDaniel, Jamin (1998)   (1 citation)  (Correct)

....verifier specifying from which keyserver it wishes to retrieve the certificate. 4 It is worth noting that we do not specify a mechanism for locating the enterprise root node of an external enterprise. There are several existing designs for scalable network directory services, such as DNS [Moc87a, Moc87b]. These services are readily available within today s Internet infrastructure, and as such are beyond the scope of this paper. We illustrate the retrieval process through an example in Figure 3. Assume all nodes initially have empty caches, save the permanent entries. We state that the enterprise ....

P. Mockapetris. Domain Names - Concepts and Facilities. RFC 1034, Internet Network Working Group, November 1987.


A Scalable Key Distribution Hierarchy - McDaniel, Jamin (1998)   (Correct)

....for determining preferred values for the protocol parameters. Primarily, we seek to find the best choices for caching policies and certificate hold times. Unfortunately, there are limited existing systems of this type from which we can collect data. We argue that DNS (Domain Name Service) [Moc87a, Moc87b] likely has the usage characteristics that our system will encounter. Similar to certificate requests, DNS requests are most often used as a precursor to a session [DOK92] From an analysis of DNS traffic we can determine when, how often, and to whom connections are made. Assuming that the secure ....

....requester specifying from which keyserver it wishes to retrieve the certificate. It is worth noting that we do not specify a mechanism for locating the enterprise root node of an external enterprise. There are several existing designs for scalable network directory services, such as DNS [Moc87a, Moc87b]. These services are readily available within today s Internet infrastructure, and as such are beyond the scope of this paper. We illustrate this protocol through an example. We return to our example hierarchy description in Figure 2. Assume all hosts initially have empty caches, save the ....

P. Mockapetris. Domain Names - Implementation and Specification. RFC 1035, Internet Network Working Group, November 1987.


A Scalable Key Distribution Hierarchy - McDaniel, Jamin (1998)   (Correct)

....for determining preferred values for the protocol parameters. Primarily, we seek to find the best choices for caching policies and certificate hold times. Unfortunately, there are limited existing systems of this type from which we can collect data. We argue that DNS (Domain Name Service) [Moc87a, Moc87b] likely has the usage characteristics that our system will encounter. Similar to certificate requests, DNS requests are most often used as a precursor to a session [DOK92] From an analysis of DNS traffic we can determine when, how often, and to whom connections are made. Assuming that the secure ....

....requester specifying from which keyserver it wishes to retrieve the certificate. It is worth noting that we do not specify a mechanism for locating the enterprise root node of an external enterprise. There are several existing designs for scalable network directory services, such as DNS [Moc87a, Moc87b]. These services are readily available within today s Internet infrastructure, and as such are beyond the scope of this paper. We illustrate this protocol through an example. We return to our example hierarchy description in Figure 2. Assume all hosts initially have empty caches, save the ....

P. Mockapetris. Domain Names - Concepts and Facilities. RFC 1034, Internet Network Working Group, November 1987.


A Scalable Key Distribution Hierarchy - McDaniel, Jamin (1998)   (Correct)

....for determining preferred values for the protocol parameters. Primarily, we seek to find the best choices for caching policies and certificate hold times. Unfortunately, there are limited existing systems of this type from which we can collect data. We argue that DNS (Domain Name Service) [Moc87a, Moc87b] likely has the usage characteristics that our system will encounter. Similar to certificate requests, DNS requests are most often used as a precursor to a session [DOK92] From an analysis of DNS traffic we can determine when, how often, and to whom connections are made. Assuming that the secure ....

....requester specifying from which keyserver it wishes to retrieve the certificate. It is worth noting that we do not specify a mechanism for locating the enterprise root node of an external enterprise. There are several existing designs for scalable network directory services, such as DNS [Moc87a, Moc87b]. The investigation of these services is beyond the scope of this paper. We illustrate this protocol through an example. We return to our example hierarchy description in Figure 2. Assume all hosts initially have empty caches, save the permanent entries. We state that both the enterprise root ....

P. Mockapetris. Domain Names - Implementation and Specification. RFC 1035, Internet Network Working Group, November 1987.


A Scalable Key Distribution Hierarchy - McDaniel, Jamin (1998)   (Correct)

....for determining preferred values for the protocol parameters. Primarily, we seek to find the best choices for caching policies and certificate hold times. Unfortunately, there are limited existing systems of this type from which we can collect data. We argue that DNS (Domain Name Service) [Moc87a, Moc87b] likely has the usage characteristics that our system will encounter. Similar to certificate requests, DNS requests are most often used as a precursor to a session [DOK92] From an analysis of DNS traffic we can determine when, how often, and to whom connections are made. Assuming that the secure ....

....requester specifying from which keyserver it wishes to retrieve the certificate. It is worth noting that we do not specify a mechanism for locating the enterprise root node of an external enterprise. There are several existing designs for scalable network directory services, such as DNS [Moc87a, Moc87b]. The investigation of these services is beyond the scope of this paper. We illustrate this protocol through an example. We return to our example hierarchy description in Figure 2. Assume all hosts initially have empty caches, save the permanent entries. We state that both the enterprise root ....

P. Mockapetris. Domain Names - Concepts and Facilities. RFC 1034, Internet Network Working Group, November 1987.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC