| Wallach, H. and Austin-Adams, P. (1954). Recognition and the localization of visual traces. American Journal of Psychology, 67:338--340. |
....family of methods (which includes the CoF model) will also prove to be capable of meta categorization and of reasoning about structure. Psychology. An early indication that at least in some recognition related tasks what and where cues are intimately intertwined was provided by the work of (Wallach and Austin Adams, 1954), who found that the interpretation of an ambiguous shape could be biased by priming with an unambiguous version, but only if both appeared within the same visual quadrant. A similar confinement of the effect to a quadrant was found, in a subliminal priming task, by (Bar and Biederman, 1998) In a ....
Wallach, H. and Austin-Adams, P. (1954). Recognition and the localization of visual traces. American Journal of Psychology, 67:338--340.
....the stimulus moving from one quadrant of the visual field to another (Bar and Biederman, 1998) 6 Such an outcome is a direct consequence of the kind of split treatment of the visual field postulated by the CoF model. 6 A much earlier report of a similar effect of translation can be found in (Wallach and Austin Adams, 1954). We thank S. Kaufmann for bringing this reference to our attention. Psychophysical studies of object representation more often than not involved quantifying the effects of manipulating entire intact objects rather than object parts. The contour deletion study of (Biederman and Cooper, 1991b) ....
Wallach, H. and Austin-Adams, P. (1954). Recognition and the localization of visual traces. American Journal of Psychology, 67:338--340.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC