Cummins, R. (1983). The Nature of Psychological Explanation, Cambridge, Mass., M.I.T. Press. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis - Fodor, Pylyshyn (1988) (189 citations) (Correct)
.... arguments over which, if any, rules are explicitly mentally represented have raged for decades within the Classicist camp. See, for relatively recent examples, the discussion of the explicitness of grammatical rules in Stabler (1985) and replies; for a philosophical discussion, see Cummins 1983). The one thing that Classical theorists do agree about is that it can t be that all behavioral regularities are determined by explicit rules; at least some of the causal determinants of compliant behavior must be implicit. The arguments for this parallel Lewis Carroll s observations in What the ....
Cummins, R. (1983). The Nature of Psychological Explanation, Cambridge, Mass., M.I.T. Press.
Consciuosness: Mapping the theoretical landscape - Atkinson, al. (2000) (Correct)
No context found.
Cummins, R. (1983) The Nature of Psychological Explanation, MIT Press
In Defence of Functional Analysis - Faith (Correct)
No context found.
R. Cummins. The nature of psychological explanation. MIT Press, 1983.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC