B.E. Martin, C.H. Pedersen, and J.B. Roberts, "An object based taxonomy for distributed computing systems", IEEE Computer, Aug 1991, pp17-27.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....been viewed as client server type, but could be cast to varying degrees in peer to peer paradigm. The taxonomy is not concerned with the details of the object model used, or with the overall distributed system that supports the application. In this respect, our focus is di#erent from the one in [23], which presents a comprehensive hierarchy for classifying entire distributed computing systems. 10 K. Kant et al. On the Potential of PtP Computing Not for distribution or attribution: for review only 3.1 Classifying Dimensions In approaching the classification, we identify the ....

B.E. Martin, C.H. Pedersen, and J.B. Roberts, "An object based taxonomy for distributed computing systems", IEEE Computer, Aug 1991, pp17-27.

....Figure 1 shows the difference between loosely coupled and tightly coupled components. While loosely coupled components have their own memory and communicate by exchanging messages via a communication channel, tightly coupled components communicate by sharing a common memory (see [GrRe93] and [MPBR91] Ferstl O.K. Sinz E.J. From Business Process Modeling. 4 A system can have different degrees of distribution. Replacing loosely coupled components with tightly coupled components decreases the degree of distribution. On the other hand, splitting tightly coupled components into loosely ....

Martin B.E., Pedersen C.H., Bedford-Roberts J.: An Object-Based Taxonomy for Distributed Computing Systems. In: IEEE Computer, Vol. 24, No. 8 (1991), 17 - 27 This work is partly supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) under contract No. Si 481/1-3.

....In this paper he relates experiences learned from designing and implementing many successful computer systems. The latest paradigms used and being advocated for distributed computing design include programming languages and, in particular, the concepts behind the object model [Hutchison,91] Martin,91] However, as mentioned earlier, one of the biggest challenges in building distributed solutions, as we see it, is not building dedicated infrastructures where everything from the hardware to the software have been build as a one off experiment, but to find ways where selected modules, from ....

Martin, B. E., Pedersen, C. H. and Bedford-Roberts, J., "An Object-Based Taxonomy for Distributed Computing Systems," IEEE Computer, 24(8), pp. 17-27, (August 1991).

....creation results in a set of capabilities for that object being returned. Before it can be used, the object must be mapped into a process s address space by resolving one of its capabilities. All objects are persistent, once created an object does not depend upon the existence of its creator [23]. This means that as long as the object is referenced it will remain present in the object space. Objects can be explicitly deleted, but if a process dies before removing an object only it referenced, this object must be cleared away, to retrieve the virtual address space it occupies, and to save ....

B. Martin, C. Pedersen, and J. Bedford-Roberts, "An object-based taxonomy for distributed computing systems," IEEE Computer, vol. 24, pp. 17--27, August 1991.

No context found.

B. Martin, et al., "An Object-Based Taxonomy for Distributed Computing Systems", COMPUTER, August 1991, pp. 17-27.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC