Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....identification processes are rather simple and could operate on the semiattentive stage. Focal attention is then just needed to bind the correct result to the target and the reaction. Although it may be more efficient to suppress the computation of letter and target identities, the Stroop effect [41] suggests that they are too automated to be suppressed whenever an item is selected. V. CONCLUSIONS The novel architecture of two selection stages in visual attention, providing an additional semiattentive computation stage was motivated by problems conventional approaches of visual attention ....

J. Stroop, "Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions," Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 18, pp. 643--662, 1935.

....show that Computer Science also draws on other fields including psychology and social sciences. This can create interest for people who may not be attracted to a discipline that seems to be primarily about working with machines instead of people. We began with a demonstration of the Stroop e#ect [8]. We used about six cards, each of which had the name of a color on it (blue, green, etc. but the name was printed in a di#erent color (e.g. blue was printed using red ink) The cards are held up one at a time for the audience, who must call out what the color of the writing is. Most people ....

J R Stroop. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18:643--662, 1935. 5

....purpose machine, acting with equal skill on any type of operation that it performs by invoking a set of powerful rules. However, humans seem to be proficient only in particular sets of skills, at the expense of other skills, often in non obvious ways. A good example of this is the Stroop e#ect (Stroop 1935). When presented with a list of words written in a variety of colors, performance in a color recognition and articulation task is dependent on the semantic content of the words; the task is very di#cult if names of colors are printed in noncorresponding colors. This experiment demonstrates the ....

Stroop, J. (1935), `Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions', Journal of Experimental Psychology 18, 643--62.

.... These scenarios usually involve two experimental scenarios, one in which automatic and effortful processes work in concert (a facilitation paradigm) and another in which automatic and effortful processes act in opposition (an interference paradigm, similar to that used in the Stroop task, Stroop 1935). Through the development of two simultaneous equations, the relative automatic and effortful contributions to task performance can be isolated. This work has been fundamental in identifying the notable impact automatic influences on memory and perception can exert on a wide variety of phenomena ....

Stroop, J. R., (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.

.... Picture naming tasks evoke concepts with pictures of concrete objects (like the rabbit in Figure 2) In classic Stroop studies, in which speakers are asked to name the color of the ink in which a word is printed, the concept is evoked by the colored stimulus (the ink itself or a color patch; Stroop, 1935). More Where mind meets mouth 5 generally, a message can be viewed as the penultimate link in the traditional information processing chain from sensory processing to output. As such, it is a perceptual or conceptual categorization of the input. Going to the bottom of Figure 2, we will also set ....

....Seidenberg, Waters, Sanders, Langer, 1984; West Stanovich, 1986; Wright Garrett, 1984) Where mind meets mouth 37 best known example of an indirect word recognition test that produces interference, the Stroop naming task. Stroop interference. In its most familiar variants, the Stroop task (Stroop, 1935) involves the presentation of words printed in assorted ink colors, and requires naming the ink colors rather than the words themselves. The words, however, denote colors that are congruent or incongruent with the ink colors. For example, the word blue printed in blue ink would be a congruent ....

Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.

....the subject s brain independently act appropriately even if one side falsely explained the choice of the other) Human cognition is not a general purpose processing system: It can be proficient in a particular set of skills, at the expense of other skills. A good example is the Stroop effect (Stroop, 1935). When presented with a list of words written in a variety of colors, performance in a color recognition and articulation task is dependent on the semantic content of the words. The task is very difficult if names of colors are printed in non corresponding colors. This experiment demonstrates the ....

Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 18:643--662.

....machine, acting with equal skill on any type of operation that it performs by invoking a set of powerful rules. However, humans seem to be proficient only in particular sets of skills, at the expense of other skills, and often in non obvious ways. A good example of this is the Stroop effect (Stroop 1935). When presented with a list of words written in a variety of colors, performance in a color recognition and articulation task is actually dependent on the semantic content of the words; the task is very difficult if names of colors are printed in specialized colors. This experiment demonstrates ....

Stroop, J. (1935), `Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions', Journal of Experimental Psychology 18, 643--62.

....so that processing is competitive. In an earlier paper, Cohen et al. 1990) demonstrated that a simple feedforward model with one hidden layer, using the back propagation learning algorithm (Rumelhart et al. 1986) could simulate many of the key empirical findings of timing in the Stroop task (Stroop, 1935). In subsequent work Cohen et al. 1992) adapted the network to perform the Eriksen task (Eriksen and Eriksen, 1974) in which the subject s task is to press a button (S or H) corresponding to the middle stimulus of a string of five letters (either HHHHH, HHSHH, SSSSS, SSHSS) concluding that ....

Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.

....1995) computational frameworks such as connectionism make it very clear that alternatives to dichotomous characterizations exist and that they often provide better accounts of the data. A convincing example of how this may be so is provided by interpretations of the Stroop interference effect (Stroop, 1935, see also Glaser Glaser (1982) and its implications regarding automaticity. In the Stroop paradigm, participants are asked to perform one of two tasks: either read a word aloud, or name the color of the ink that the word is printed in. The difficulty of the task is that the words can be the ....

Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643--662.

....purpose machine, acting with equal skill on any type of operation that it performs by invoking a set of powerful rules. However, humans seem to be proficient only in particular sets of skills, at the expense of other skills, often in non obvious ways. A good example of this is the Stroop e#ect (Stroop 1935). When presented with a list of words written in a variety of colors, performance in a color recognition and articulation task is actually dependent on the semantic content of the words; the task is very di#cult if names of colors are printed in non corresponding colors. This experiment ....

Stroop, J. (1935), `Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions', Journal of Experimental Psychology 18, 643--62.

....processing Greebles with their default object recognition system, into experts, who were not only faster and more accurate but displayed a greater sensitivity to configural changes. This effect of expertise acquisition on the part recognition paradigm can be compared to Stroop interference (Stroop, 1935). Robust interference is found in the Stroop task when subjects have to name the color of incongruently colored color terms. This interference is due to the automaticity of reading that has been acquired over years of practice. In a similar fashion, the acquisition of Greeble expertise leads to ....

Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 242-248.

....The classic illustration of semantic priming is described in (Neely 1977) which shows that conscious visual priming takes at least 700ms to happen and that people rely on sub symbolic attention when less reaction time is available. The classic account of semantic interference is the Stroop effect (Stroop 1935). In this experiment, subjects took longer to name the color of ink in which a word was printed if the word was the name of a different color, for example the word yellow printed in blue ink. The effect is also encountered if the subjects are to name the color of a rectangle but the name of ....

Stroop, J. R. 1935. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 18:643- 662.

....1991) and the interaction between the regularity effect and the position in a word of a grapheme phoneme irregularity (9 Coltheart, 1999a) effects which, we argue, arise for the same reason as the positionsensitive Stroop effect we report. 3 4 In the standard version of the Stroop task (Stroop, 1935), subjects are asked to name rapidly the colours in which visually presented stimuli are displayed. When these visual stimuli are themselves the written names of colours, the latency and accuracy of the colour naming responses are affected by whether the written colour name coincides with or ....

Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.

No context found.

Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.

No context found.

Stroop, J.R. (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. Exp. Psychol. 18, 643--662 [Reprinted in J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.

No context found.

Stroop, J. R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1935. 12, 643--662.

No context found.

Stroop, V. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.

No context found.

STROOP, V. R. 1935, Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC