Modules, frames, pidgeons, sleeping dogs, and music of the spheres. In: The robot's dilemma: The frame problem in artificial intelligence, ed. Z. W. Pylyshyn. Ablex. [KFM]  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....choice of formal terminology (i.e. the right uents and actions) e ect axioms will not involve more than a few uents on average; and perhaps even that (b) there is an e ective procedure allowing an agent interacting with the world to converge toward such a right choice of terminology. Fodor (1987) seems to demand all this and more of any genuine solution to the frame problem; however, most AI researchers take a more practical view. 9 deserves detailed reiteration. Suppose, for example, that we want to allow for the possibility that when the robot drops an object it might break, without ....

J.A. Fodor, \Modules, frames, fridgeons, sleeping dogs, and the music of the spheres," In Z.W. Pylyshyn (1987), pages 139-149. 1987.

.... the center of research on language understanding is an ongoing modularity debate whether the language understanding faculties of the human brain have a modular architecture or whether they interact and are integrated to different degrees [Birnbaum, 1986; Birnbaum 1989; Crain and Steedman, 1985; Fodor, 1987; Frazier, 1987; Marslen Wilson and Tyler, 1987; Tanenhaus, Dell, and Carlson, 1987] Psycholinguistic studies have found evidence for modularity [Clifton and Ferreira, 1987; Fodor, 1983; Frazier, 1987] as well as for interaction between different faculties of language processing [Crain and ....

....for autonomy comes from the complexity of interaction and that of integrating preferences from several higher levels in making online decisions. The speed and automaticity of decisions at the lower levels of sentence processing seem to suggest a fast, autonomous, automatic process [Fodor, 1983; Fodor, 1987] 3 EVIDENCE FOR THE CLAIMS 12 onto S NP VP ART V N NP N NP ART N PP P Sam loaded the boxes on the cart PP P Figure 7: Non Minimal Prepositional Attachment. S NP VP ART V N NP NP ART N PP P the the PRO I saw man with horse Figure 8: Right Association. 3 EVIDENCE FOR THE CLAIMS 13 Evidence ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

J. A. Fodor. Modules, Frames, Fridgeons, Sleeping Dogs, and the Music of the Spheres. In J. L. Garfield, editor, Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural-Language Understanding. MIT Press, 1987.

....enough evidence is offered to cause a paradigm shift. The shift then becomes necessary to retain consistency. One way in which EC, as previously defined, may fall short as a cognitive model is in its holistic approach. The goal of EC is global coherence. Some researchers, such as Fodor ([Fod87]) postulate modular and non modular cognitive processes. It would appear that not all of the possible information is being used when we form beliefs, as shown by the fact that people often remind us of things we have forgotten to include in our formulation. The information is present , it was ....

Jerry A. Fodor. Modules, Frames, Fridgeons, Sleeping Dogs, and the Music of the Spheres, pages 139--149. In Pylyshyn [Pyl87], 1987.

....Chapter 5 for further discussion of the distinction between the integrated processing principle and previous attempts at implementing it by integrating the representations of different types of knowledge. 5 whether they interact and are integrated to different degrees (Crain and Steedman, 1985; Fodor, 1987; Frazier, 1987; Marslen Wilson and Tyler, 1987; Tanenhaus, Dell, and Carlson, 1987) Psycholinguistic studies have found evidence for modularity (Clifton and Ferreira, 1987; Fodor, 1983; Frazier, 1987) as well as for interaction between different faculties of language processing (e.g. Crain and ....

....of interaction and that of integrating preferences from several higher levels in making on line decisions. The speed and automaticity of decisions at the lower levels of sentence processing seem to suggest a fast, autonomous, automatic process for tasks such as syntactic analysis (Fodor, 1983; Fodor, 1987). Fodor (1983) called these input systems which share a set of characteristics different from central systems (such as that input systems are domain specific, mandatory in operation, fast, and informationally encapsulated) Syntactic processing matches this view of an input system better than ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

Fodor, J. A. (1987). Modules, frames, fridgeons, sleeping dogs, and the music of the spheres. In Garfield, J. L., editor, Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural-Language Understanding.

No context found.

Modules, frames, pidgeons, sleeping dogs, and music of the spheres. In: The robot's dilemma: The frame problem in artificial intelligence, ed. Z. W. Pylyshyn. Ablex. [KFM]

No context found.

J. A. Fodor. Modules, frames, fridgeons, sleeping dogs, and the music of spheres. In J. L. Garfield, editor, Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural-Language Understanding. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1987.

No context found.

Jerry A. Fodor. Modules, frames, fridgeons, sleeping dogs, and the music of the spheres. In The Robot's Dilemma: the Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence, pages 139--149. Albex, Norwood, NJ, 1987.

No context found.

Fodor, J. A. (1987). Modules, frames, fridgeons, sleeping dogs, and the music of the spheres. In Z. W. Pylyshyn (Ed.), The robot's dilemma: The frame problem in articial intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC