Keister, W., Ketchledge, R.W., and Vaughan, H.E.: No. 1 ESS: System organization and objectives. Bell System Technical Journal 53, 5 (part 1), (September, 1964) p. 1841. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
End-To-End Arguments In System Design - Saltzer, Reed, Clark (1984) (417 citations) (Correct)
....guarantee that an unconfirmed request for a reservation will survive a system crash are thus not vital. In telephone exchanges, a failure that could cause a single call to be lost is considered not worth providing explicit recovery for, since the caller will probably replace the call if it matters[7]: All of these design approaches are examples of the end to end argument being applied to automatic recovery. Much of the debate in the network protocol community over datagrams, virtual circuits, and connectionless protocols is a debate about end to end arguments. A modularity argument prizes a ....
Keister, W., Ketchledge, R.W., and Vaughan, H.E.: No. 1 ESS: System organization and objectives. Bell System Technical Journal 53, 5 (part 1), (September, 1964) p. 1841.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC