| J. W. Davis. Power benchmark strategy for systems employing power management. IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and Environment, 1993. |
....out of power while in the middle of a long air flight understands the impact of insufficient batteries. If the battery s power capacity cannot be improved, the other alternative is to find ways to use less power, preferably with no impact on the user. Many researchers have looked at this problem [3], 14] 19] Solutions range from intelligent management of the disk and screen [4] 7] 8] 13] to slowing down the CPU clock rate [6] 23] or powering down components of the computer not currently in use. Many of these innovations have already found their way into commercial use, a strong ....
....design for remote execution support. V. Related Work Much research has been performed on power management, including measurement techniques, approaches, methods, technical tools, etc. Power measurement techniques for laptop devices and applications and benchmark strategies were discussed in [3], 14] and [22] Many techniques to save laptop power are based on switching off or slowing down the most power costly devices, such as the hard drive, CPU, and wireless network devices when they are not being used. 24] 19] 13] 4] 7] and [8] discuss different strategies to reduce hard ....
James W. Davis, "Power Benchmark Strategy for Systems Employing Power Management," IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and Environment, 1993.
....is both useful and power inexpensive. I. INTRODUCTION The continuing limitations on battery power make power management one of the most challenging problems in portable computing. Various power conservation techniques have been proposed, including turning off the portable computer s screen [2], optimizing hard drive I O [7] slowing down the CPU [5] etc. Recently, process migration over wireless networks has been proposed to conserve power [11] 13] Powerconsumptive processes are migrated over wireless networks to a server that performs the actual computation, and the results are ....
James W. Davis. Power Benchmark Strategy for Systems Employing Power Management, IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and Environment, 1993.
....switching too infrequently achieves less than maximum energy savings. Models of the power utilization for individual subsystems can help determine when state transitions would be beneficial, across a range of operating conditions. Three factors determine when a state transition is beneficial [Da93a]: power consumption . system performance . system reliability Minimization of power consumption is the main goal of power management software. Efficient switching of subsystem into their low power state can produce the desired energy savings. Unfortunately, power management often effects system ....
Davis, J., "Power Benchmark Strategy for Systems Employing Power Management," IEEE International Symp. on Electronics and the Environment, May 10-12, 1993, pg. 117-119.
No context found.
J. W. Davis. Power benchmark strategy for systems employing power management. IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and Environment, 1993.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC