Shah, F., M. Evens, J. Michael, and A. Rovick: 1998, `Classifying Student Initiatives and Tutor Responses: A First Step toward Mixed-Initiative Dialogue'. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. in this issue. Home/Search Document Details and Download
Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
A Computational Mechanism for Initiative in Answer Generation - Green, Carberry (1999) (2 citations) (Correct)
....satisfies our explanation indicated stimulus condition; but the other motivations covered by our stimulus conditions are not handled. Finally, the model presented in this paper is relevant to several systems described in this issue. It could be used by the CIRCSIM tutor described by Shah et al. [Shah et al..1998] in generating responses to a student s Yes No questions. Shah et al. present a classification of student initiative types and tutor responses. Consider for example the following dialogue segment from their paper: EX. 2.9 K16 st 46 2: Is sympa stimulation the only factor influencing cc ....
Shah, F., M. Evens, J. Michael, and A. Rovick: 1998, `Classifying Student Initiatives and Tutor Responses: A First Step toward Mixed-Initiative Dialogue'. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. in this issue.
Using Joint Actions To Explain Acknowledgments In Tutorial.. - Brandle (1998) (3 citations) (Correct)
....phases, the tutor may also go fishing for possible problems in the student s understanding. For more details about the three protocols see [Khuwaja, 1995] 2.4.3 Previous Work. Members of the CIRCSIM Tutor project have studied different aspects of tutoring language. Hume [1995] studied hinting; Shah [1997], studied student initiatives and the tutor s responses; Sanders [1995] demonstrated the need for multiturn discourse planning; Freedman [1997] developed rules to describe discourse generation at several levels. 20 CHAPTER III DEVELOPING A THEORY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT I started my study of ....
....in working on this set was to determine how consistently the informants could apply the categorization scheme. The informants were left completely alone while working on these transcripts. 4.3.1.2 Methodology. I used the kappa statistic [Dawson Saunders and Trapp, 1994; Georgakis et al. 1988; Shah and Evens, 1997] to measure classification reliability. The kappa coefficient (K) measures pairwise agreement among classified items. The following are the possible K values: K = 1 complete agreement K = 0 no more than chance agreement K 0 less agreement than would be expected by chance alone The goal of the ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Shah, Farhana, and Evens, Martha. 1997. Classifying Student Initiatives and Tutor Responses: A First Step toward Mixed-Initiative Dialogue. Unpublished document. Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC