162 citations found. Retrieving documents...
Griffiths, P., and Harris, J. Principles of algebraic geometry. Wiley-interscience, London-New-York, 1978.

 Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check  

This paper is cited in the following contexts:

First 50 documents  Next 50

Numerical Exterior Algebra and the Compound Matrix Method - Allen, Bridges (2000)   (2 citations)  (Correct)

....(2.4) along a path of k dimensional subspaces, it has to be restricted to decomposable k forms. We will give the details of this restriction for n = 4 and k = 2 and then mention aspects of the case for general k and n. A 2 form U 2 ) is decomposable if U U = 0 (cf. Griffiths Harris [17]) Expanding U in terms of the standard basis (2.7) of 0 = U U = U i U j i j = U 1 U 6 U 2 U 5 U 3 U 4 ) e 1 e 2 e 3 e 4 : 2.12) De ne I : C by I(U) U 1 U 6 U 2 U 5 U 3 U 4 : 2.13) For a path of the equation (2.4) with k = 2 and n = 4 to be a path of 2 ....

....ne I : C by I(U) U 1 U 6 U 2 U 5 U 3 U 4 : 2.13) For a path of the equation (2.4) with k = 2 and n = 4 to be a path of 2 dimensional subspaces, the function (2.13) has to be preserved. The surface de ned by I(U) 0 is G 2 (C ) the Grassmannian manifold of 2 planes in C (cf. [17]) Alternatively, the form of the invariant (2.13) can be derived using the identity, T = 2.14) where is a 6 6 symmetric orthogonal matrix associated with Hodge duality, de ned in equation (A.11) in Appendix A. The identity (2.14) can be veri ed by direct calculation using ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

P. Griffiths & J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, Wiley: New York, 1978.


Pole Placement and Matrix Extension Problems: A Common.. - Kim, Rosenthal, Wang   (Correct)

....order to invoke results from intersection theory [6] it is important to understand the intersection at the boundary of L. What is needed is a good compactification of L. It turns out that Problem 1.1 induces in a natural way a compactification and we will explain this in the sequel. Recall [8, 9] that the Grassmannian Grass(m, K ) m q is the set of all m dimensional subspaces in K . For each X ) let X = span then # 2 is a vector in the exterior product = K m ) and #m = k(# 1 #m ) for some k 0 in K. Therefore by considering the components of ....

P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978.


Rigid Analytic Picard Theorems - Cherry, Ru   (Correct)

....Thus the geometric logarithmic derivative lemma implies that f # # for every holomorphic map f : C X. Because X is one dimensional, it easily follows in this case that f must be constant. Allowing logarithmic singularities, this method also works for the complement of 3 points in P . In higher dimensions, even in the case of Abelian varieties, the di#culty lies in concluding from f # # that f is algebraically degenerate. In this paper, we establish a non Archimedean version of the geometric logarithmic derivative lemma in characteristic zero. However, because the structure of the ....

.... A [r 1 , # i ] together with the analytic functions f i define an e#ective Cartier divisor D on A [r 1 , r 2 ) Depending on F and r 2 , we cannot necessarily represent D as the zeros of an analytic function on all of [r 1 , r 2 ) However, we can define N(D, r) by choosing i large enough that # i r and then setting N(D, r) N(f i , 0, r) The choice of f i make this well defined. As usual, we get the group of Cartier divisors by taking formal di#erences of e#ective Cartier divisors, and we extend the definition of N(D, r) to the full group of Cartier divisors in the natural ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, John Wiley & Sons, 1978.


Maximally Inflected Real Rational Curves - Kharlamov, Sottile   (1 citation)  (Correct)

....Schubert variety X F q (s) where j j = 1 and s is not among fs 1 ; s n g. This gives a rational curve violating Proposition 1.1. Thus the intersection is zero dimensional. Let N( be its degree, which may be computed using the classical Schubert calculus of enumerative geometry [12]. Thus we deduce the following Corollary of Proposition 1.1. Corollary 1.2. Given d r, rami cation data , and distinct points s 1 ; s n 2 P , the number of nondegenerate rational curves in P at point s i for each 1 i n is N( counted with multiplicity. Let ....

P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, J. Wiley and Sons, 1978.


Degrees of real Wronski maps - Eremenko, Gabrielov (2002)   (2 citations)  (Correct)

....to GF , # S = # S GF : GF . 3) Then # S is a finite regular map of projective varieties. When F = C this map has a degree, which can be defined in this case as the number of preimages of a generic point and is independent of S . This degree was computed by Schubert in 1886 (see [12, 9, 10] for modern treatment) Theorem A When F = C, the degree of # S is d(m, p) 1 2 . p 1) mp) m (m 1) m p 1) 4) Projective duality implies that d(m, p) d(p, m) Here are some values of d(m, p) m = 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 p = 2 2 5 14 42 132 429 1430 p = 3 42 462 6006 ....

Ph. Gri#ths and J. Harris, Principles of algebraic geometry, Willey, NY, 1978.


Pieri's Rule For Flag Manifolds And Schubert Polynomials - Sottile (1995)   (1 citation)  (Correct)

....jth row has length #fi j a i = jg such that and the map j XwFq X w 0 w 0 Fq 0 : XwF q has degree 1. Lemma 11 is the surprising connection to the classical Pieri s rule that was mentioned in the Introduction. A typical geometric proof of Pieri s rule for Grassmannians (see [13, 15]) involves showing a triple intersection of Schubert varieties mG is transverse and consists of a single point, when G q ; G q are in suitably general position. We would like to construct a proof of Theorem 1 along those lines, studying a triple intersection of Schubert ....

P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, Joseph Wiley and Sons, 1978.


Pieri-Type Formulas For Maximal Isotropic Grassmannians Via.. - Sottile (1997)   (Correct)

....of the Pieri type formula that we complete in Section 3. Also needed is Lemma 2.1, which identifies a particular subspace of H he 1 ; e n i for c . For Lemma 2.1, we work in the (classical) Grassmannian G k (V : he 1 ; e n i. For basic definitions and results see any of [8, 5, 4]. Schubert c of G k (V ) are indexed by partitions oe 2 Y k , that is, integer sequences oe = oe 1 ; oe k ) with n Gamma k oe 1 Delta Delta Delta oe k 0. For oe 2 Y k define j = n Gamma k Gamma oe k 1 Gammaj . For oe; 2 Y k , define : fH 2 G k (V ) j dimH he ....

....formula that we complete in Section A.3. Also needed is Lemma A.2.1, which identifies a particular subspace of H hf 1 ; f n i for H 2 Y c . For Lemma A.2.1, we work in the (classical) Grassmannian G k (W : hf 1 ; f n i. For basic definitions and results see any of [8, 5, 4]. Schubert c of G k (W ) are indexed by partitions oe 2 Y k . For oe 2 Y k define j = n Gamma k Gamma oe k 1 Gammaj . For oe; 2 Y k , define : fH 2 G k (W ) j dimH hf k 1 Gammaj j ; f n i j; 1 j kg c : fH 2 G k (W ) j dimH hf 1 ; f j oe ....

P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, J. Wiley and Sons, 1978.


Quantum Schubert Calculus - Bertram (1997)   (14 citations)  (Correct)

....compactification (the Grothendieck quot scheme) of the space of holomorphic maps of a fixed degree from P to a Grassmannian. Partially supported by NSF grant DMS 9218215 and a Sloan fellowship In order to fix notation and refresh the reader s memory, we begin with an overview (following [GH]) of the classical Schubert calculus before continuing with the introduction. Let: V be a vector space over C of dimension n, 0 = V 0 ae V 1 ae : ae V n = V be a full flag for V , G : G(n Gamma k; n) be the Grassmannian of n Gamma k dim l subspaces of V , x ae V be the subspace ....

P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, WileyInterscience (1978).


Quantum Schubert polynomials and the Vafa-Intriligator formula. - Kirillov, Maeno (1996)   (7 citations)  (Correct)

....of dimension n over the ring R, with basis either Sw (x) or Sw (x; y) w 2 S n , Z[x 1 ; x n : 2.5 Residue pairing. Let I be an ideal in P n = R[x 1 ; x n ] R ae C, generated by a regular system of parameters 1 ; n , and A : P n =I. 13 Proposition 6 ([GH], EL] ffl dimR A 1. ffl H : det i 62 I. Let d 0 : deg H, where we assume that deg x i = 1 for all 1 i n. Proposition 7 ( EL] P n and deg f = d 0 , then there exists a non zero ff 2 R such that f j H (mod I) P n , f 6= 0, and deg f d 0 , then there exists g 2 P ....

.... f d 0 , then choose g 2 P n such that g j f (mod I) and deg g d 0 , and define Res I (f) Res I (g) We will use also notation hfi I instead of Res I (f ) Finally, let us define a residue pairing h; i I on P n using the Grothendieck hf; gi I = Res I (f; g) f; g 2 P n : Proposition 8 ([GH]) ffl If f 2 I, then Res I (f) 0. ffl The residue pairing h; i I induces a non degenerate pairing on A = P =I. 14 We will use this general construction of residue pairing in the following two cases: i) R = Z, I n ae P n is an ideal generated by elementary symmetric polynomials e 1 (x) ....

Griffiths Ph., Harris J., Principles of algebraic geometry, John Wiley& Sons, New York, 1978.


Invariants for Pairs of Almost Complex Structures - Coffman   (Correct)

....f)A. The sign of the index differs from the [Eells Wood] formulas, which use the complexified bundle map T X T instead of (2) If f is a generic perturbation of a holomorphic map, with ramification v(q) 1 at finitely many branch points q 2 X , then the Riemann Hurwitz theorem applies ( Griffiths Harris] X = deg f)A Gamma (v(q) Gamma 1) so the number of points where f is C linear is 2X (v(q) Gamma 1) It is well known that in this two dimensional case, f is conformal (anglepreserving) at points where df is C linear, and indirectly conformal (anglereversing) at points where df is ....

P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1978.


Algebraic Curves And Non Rigid Minimal Surfaces In The Euclidean.. - Pirola (1998)   (Correct)

....= 0 : m j = 0: This is impossible. If F extends on p j and (Y; g) is not complete. 0. 22) Let X (E) be the sheaf of the meromorphic forms having polar divisor contained in E: Recall that X (E) can be identified with the sheaf of the holomorphic sections of a line bundle on X (see [1] or [7]) which is usually still denoted by X (E) We may consider i 2 H (X; X (E) The (0.8) extends and by abuse of language we write h : X C P ; h(X) Q: Repeating the square root extraction: h = Vf; f : X C P is the extended Gauss map. Set M = f (O CP 1(1) M = X (E) We ....

.... M(N) fx 2 G(2; N) x) 0g: Let S be the dual of S: We identify as a section of : The result follows by computing the top Chern class: c 3f ) c 3 (Sym = 4 c 2 (S (c 1 (S 6= 0: In fact c 1 (S ) is ample and c 2 (S 6= 0 if f e : c 2 (S e = 1 (see [7] Ch. 3 x3) iii) Fix a half exact element s of N; s 6= 0: Set P = f Pi 2 G(2; N) s 2 Pg; P M = M(s;N) Now P is isomorphic to the projective space of the quotient of N by the space generated by s: Let O P ( Gamma1) be the tautological bundle of P and S P = S Omega O P the restriction of S ....

P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of algebraic geometry, Wiley Interscience, New York, 1978.


The Theta Divisor and Three-Manifold Invariants - Ozsváth, Szabó (2000)   (Correct)

....(the growth here corresponds to the pole at p 2 2 Sigma which we have introduced in our convention for the Abel Jacobi map) Existence of the section follows from the fact that the g 2 fold Abel Jacobi map has degree one (this is the Jacobi inversion theorem , see for instance p. 235 of [9]) Uniqueness follows from the fact that a difference of two such would give an L section, showing that A 2 actually lies in the theta divisor, which we assumed it could not. We show the restrictions of OE T to the Sigma 2 side come close to approximating Phi 2 or, more precisely, that its ....

P. Griffiths and J. Harris. Principles of algebraic geometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1978.


Packing Lines, Planes, etc.: Packings in Grassmannian Spaces - Conway, Hardin, Sloane (1996)   (18 citations)  (Correct)

....The results have applications to the graphical display of multidimensional data via Asimov s grand tour method. 1. INTRODUCTION Although there is a considerable literature dealing with Grassmannian spaces, exemplified by [Chow 1949; Leichtweiss 1961; Wong 1967; James and Constantine 1974; Griffiths and Harris 1978, Section 1.5; MacKenzie and Morgan 1995; Zanella 1995] the problem of finding the best packings in such spaces seems to have received little attention. We have made extensive computations on this problem, and have found a number of putatively optimal packings. These computations have led us to ....

P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, Wiley, New York, 1978


Kuga-Satake Varieties And The Hodge Conjecture - van Geemen (2000)   (Correct)

....hence h(i) acts as ( Gamma1) l Gammap on V p . As Psi(v; h(i)v) is positive definite, Q is positive definite on V p if l Gamma p is even and negative definite otherwise. 1.9. Example. The cohomology groups H k (X; Q) as in 1. 2) have a polarization see [W] Th eor eme IV.7 and corollaire or [GH], p. 123. 2. The Hodge conjecture 2.1. Hodge cycles. The space of Hodge classes in a rational Hodge structure V of weight k is the Q subvector space: B(V ) 0 if k is odd; V V p;p if k = 2p: Note that V , VC = V Omega Q C; v 7 v Omega 1 and the intersection V V p;p takes ....

P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1978).


The Schottky problem and second order theta functions. - van Geemen (1999)   (Correct)

....the conference Variedas abelianas y functiones theta for the oppertunity to present these lectures and for providing the pleasent working conditions in Morelia. 2 The Schottky problem Introduction. We recall the basic results on period matrices of Riemann surfaces. References are [ACGH] C] [GH] and [CGV] Then we briefly discuss modular forms, a reference is [Ig1] 1 December 6, 1999 2 2.1 Period matrices 2.1.1 Let C be a Riemann surface of genus g (we consider only compact Riemann surfaces in these lectures) On the homology group H 1 (C; Z) Z 2g there is an (alternating, ....

P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry. J. Wiley & Sons (1978).


Around The Horn Conjecture - Manivel   (Correct)

....i ) i; 1 i rg: For example, when has a unique non zero part 1 = k, we get a special Schubert variety X k (V ffl ) fW 2 G r;s ; W V s 1 Gammak 6= 0g: We will use the notations Omega and X when the reference flag V ffl does not matter. The following facts are well known (see e.g. [10, 8, 19]) 1. The Schubert variety X is a closed subvariety of G r;s , defined locally by the vanishing of minors of the composite maps W ae C n C n =V i . 2. Let W 2 G r;s . The sequence dim (W V j ) goes from 0 to r, increasing at most by one at each step. So it increases strictly at exactly r ....

.... deduce the following fact: if and are partitions such that jj jj = rs, then Omega (V ffl ) and Omega (V 0 ffl ) meet transversely in a unique point if = where = s Gamma r ; s Gamma 1 ) is the complementary partition of , and have empty intersection otherwise (see [10], p. 198 or [19] 3.2.7) This implies that the cup product oe oe = ffi ; oe r Thetas ; where oe r Thetas is the class of a point. This means that the basis of the cohomology of the Grassmannian given by Schubert classes is, up to complementarity, self dual relatively to Poincar e duality. ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

Griffiths P., Harris J.: Principles of algebraic geometry, Second edition, Wiley 1994.


On the Hitchin System - van Geemen, Previato (1994)   (Correct)

.... : xu yv zw ts = 0 g: Note that we can rewrite the equation to obtain: T q P 3 = fp 2 (P 3 ) X i (ffl i (q) p) 0 g: 16 This implies that the lines in T q P 3 with X i = 0 (which form a linear line complex) are exactly the lines passing through the point ffl i (q) cf. [GH], p. 759 760) In particular, if T q P 3 S is a smooth quartic curve, and l i ; l 0 i are a pair of bitangents as before, then both lines have X i = 0 and thus they must intersect in ffl i (q) Let now p 2 T q P 3 ; p 6= ffl i (q) The condition that p 2 l i [ l 0 i is equivalent ....

....is a CIHS. It seems reasonable to expect that the CIHS defined by these H a i is actually Hitchin s system, but we could not establish that. 17 6 Quadratic Line Complexes 6.1 In this section we recall how the equations for the bitangents are determined. We summarize the results we need from [GH], Chapter 6 and follow [Hu] Let G ae P 5 be the Grassmannian of lines in P 3 , so G is viewed as a quadric in P 5 . For x 2 G we denote by l x the corresponding line in P 3 . For p 2 P 3 and h ae P 3 a plane we define oe(p) fx 2 G : p 2 l x g; oe(h) fx 2 G : l x ae hg: Both ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, Wiley, 1978.


On the Varieties Parametrizing Trigonal Curves with Assigned .. - Brundu, Sacchiero   (Correct)

....1. 1. Generalities on rational normal scrolls Let F be a locally free sheaf of rank r on P 1 generated by its global sections and : P(F) P 1 be the natural projection. Let W ae P N = P(H 0 (P 1 ; F) be the r dimensional scroll such that OW (1) F . 3 It is well known (see [G H], pg.516) that F decomposes as F = Phi i O(a i ) where O denotes O P 1; moreover F is very ample if and only if a i 0 for all i. Clearly in this case W = P(F) Recall the Riemann Roch theorem for vector bundles on P 1 h 0 (W; OW (1) deg(F) rk(F) 2) or, in our notation, deg(W ) ....

P.A. Griffiths, J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, Wiley--Interscience, New York, 1978.


Residual Resultant Over the Projective Plane and the.. - Busé   (2 citations)  (Correct)

....can be removed by dividing the polynomials f0 ; f1 ; f2 by the gcd of g1 ; gn . So we will only consider the relevant case where G is a local complete intersection of codimension 2. In the following we will use techniques from algebraic geometry and hence its language. We refer to [20] and [19] for complete references. We recall that OX is the sheaf of rings of regular functions over a variety (or a scheme) X and that, if L is a sheaf on X, H 0 (X; L) denotes the zeroth cohomology group of L, that is its global sections. 2.1 The residual resultant Hereafter X denotes the projective ....

Griffiths, P., and Harris, J. Principles of algebraic geometry. Wiley-interscience, London-New-York, 1978.


Qualitative features of intra-molecular dynamics. What .. - Faure Zhilinskii..   (Correct)

....i ( d 1 ; d 2 ; dK ] 7) In fact the explicit form of Todd polynomials is given in terms of elementary symmetric functions of exponents [d 1 ; d 2 ; dK ] That is why the arguments are put inside square brackets. One formal definition of Todd polynomials is given by the relation [37] det A det (I Gamma e GammatA ) Gamma1) n t Gamman ( X i Todd i (P 1 (A) P i (A) t i ) 8) 11 where A is n Theta n matrix with eigenvalues 1 ; n and P i (A) is the i th elementary symmetric function of the eigenvalues. The formal way to find the ....

....deformation quantization [41] especially in the presence of symmetry [42] is not yet fully explored. 4. 1 Topological quantum numbers for energy bands The formal topological classification of complex vector bundles over CPN can be done by using rang and Chern classes of complex vector bundles [38, 39, 40, 37, 36]. These Chern numbers play the role of topological quantum numbers for energy bands [35] From the point of view of practical calculations it is quite useful to characterize the vector bundle by the Chern polynomial 1 c 1 x c 2 x 2 c 3 x 3 Delta Delta Delta c s x s ; 12) where ....

P. Griffiths, J. Harris. Principles of Algebraic Geometry. (WileyInterscience, New York, 1978).


Degrees of real Grassmann varieties - Eremenko, Gabrielov (2001)   (Correct)

....subspaces of dimension p are real, that is defined by equations with real coe#cients, the d(m, p) subspaces of dimension m need not be real. So the problem of counting real solutions of (P) arises in this case. For the general background on Schubert calculus and Grassmann varieties we refer to [9, 10]. Let F be one of the fields R (real numbers) or C (complex numbers) We denote by GF (m, n) 1 # m # n 1, the Grassmannian, that is the set of all linear subspaces of dimension m in F n . Such subspaces can be described as row spaces of mn matrices K of maximal rank. Two such matrices K 1 ....

Ph. Gri#ths and J. Harris, Principles of algebraic geometry, Willey, NY, 1978.


The Wronski map and Grassmanians of real codimension 2.. - Eremenko, Gabrielov (2001)   (Correct)

....When the 2m given lines are real, that is defined by equations with real coe#cients, the u(m 1) subspaces of codimension 2 need not be real. So the problem of counting real solutions of (P) arises in this case. For the general background on Schubert calculus and Grassman varieties we refer to [8, 9]. Let F be one of the fields R (real numbers) or C (complex numbers) We denote by GF (m, n) 1 # m # n 1, the Grassmanian, that is the set of all linear subspaces of dimension m in F n . Such subspaces can be described as row spaces of mn matrices K of maximal rank. Two such matrices K ....

Ph. Gri#ths and J. Harris, Principles of algebraic geometry, Willey, NY, 1978.


Analyticity on Circles for Rational and Real-Analytic.. - Agranovsky, Globevnik (2001)   (Correct)

....) extends analytically into the disk Delta(a; ae i ) and if N deg P Delta deg Q, then f is an analytic rational function with poles outside of Delta ae N : Proof. Since P and Q are assumed coprime, the intersection ZP ZQ consists of at most deg P Delta deg Q points by the Bezout theorem [GH]. By the condition for N there exists j = 1; N such that ae 2 j 6= z Gamma a) w Gamma a) for any (z ; w ) 2 ZP ZQ : Hence P (z; w) and Q(z; w) have no common zero on a;ae j = f(z Gamma a) w Gamma a) ae 2 j ; 0 jz Gamma aj ae j g so all the conditions of Theorem 3.1 ....

P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, Wiley, 1978.


The Spinor Representation Of Surfaces In Space - Kusner, Schmitt (1996)   (4 citations)  (Correct)

.... at each a 2 supp P , we have r 0 = ramification index of f n: Now let f k : C P 1 Gamma P( k 1 C m ) defined by f k = f f 0 Delta Delta Delta f (k) in C m be the k th associated curve of f , and use the Plucker formulas (an extension of the Riemann Hurwitz formula see [13]) which on C P 1 are Gammad k Gamma1 2d k Gamma d k 1 Gamma 2 = r k ; THE SPINOR REPRESENTATION OF SURFACES IN SPACE 21 where d k is the degree of f k , and r k is the ramification index of f k . In the table below, multiplying the numbers on the left by the inequalities on the right and ....

Griffiths, P., and Harris, J. Principles of algebraic geometry. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1978.


Equivariant Holomorphic Morse Inequalities I: A Heat Kernel Proof - Mathai, Wu (1997)   (1 citation)  (Correct)

....p;q (M; E) is 1 2 (p q Gamma n) hence [ 3 ; Sigma ] Sigma Sigma . Set 1 = 1 2 ( Gamma ) and 2 = Gamma p Gamma1 2 ( Gamma Gamma ) Then a (a = 1; 2; 3) satisfy the standard su (2) commutation relations [ a ; b ] p Gamma1ffl abc c : 2. 1) See for example [10]. So there is a unitary representation of SU(2) on Omega ; M; E) let S a (ff) e p Gamma1ff a be the corresponding group elements. We now introduce a slightly more generalized setup. Definition 2.1. Let oe 2 Omega 1;1 (M; E) be a real valued (1; 1) form. Set (oe) oe Delta , ....

....3 (oe)S 3 (ff) 3 (oe) 2.4) Proof. A straightforward calculation using the above anti commutation relations shows that [ a ; b (oe) p Gamma1ffl abc c (oe) This means that f a (oe)g is an SU(2) triplet. Hence the result. q.e.d. It is clear that the Hodge relations (see for example [10]) Gamma ; p Gamma1 ; Gamma ; Gamma p Gamma1 (2.5) p Gamma1 ; Gamma p Gamma1 (2.6) still hold after coupling to the vector bundle E. Moreover, we have the Bochner Kodaira Nakano identities Delta = Gamma = 2 3 ( p ....

P. Griffiths & J. Harris, Principles of algebraic geometry, John Wiley, New York, 1978, x0.7.


A note on Cayley-Bacharach property for vector bundles - Tan, Viehweg   (Correct)

....in X is equivalent to the k very ampleness of some adjoint linear systems. In this paper, we show that the result remains true for the zero dimensional subscheme defined by the zero set of a global section of a rank n vector bundle (Theorem 7) generalizing a theorem of Griffiths and Harris [8], p.677. Due to the Bogomolov inequality for rank 2 semistable vector bundles [4] 12] we can establish the Cayley Bacharach theorem for codimension 2 subschemes defined by global sections of rank 2 vector bundles (Theorem 8 and Corollary 9) This result can be used to reprove Paoletti s theorem ....

....this is just saying that jKX Lj is (k Gamma 1) very ample. ut If L = GammaK X , then obviously jKX Lj is base point free. Hence the first part of Theorem 7 is true for k = 1. This is the Cayley Bacharach Theorem due to Griffiths and Harris without the assumption that Z(s) is reduced (cf. [8], p.677) Since OP n(k) is k very ample, one obtains a Cayley Bacharach theorem on P n [17] In fact, this theorem is sharp. 4. Rank 2 Vector Bundle Case A divisor L is called numerically effective (nef) if the intersection number L:C is non negative, for all irreducible curves C on X . ....

Griffiths, P., Harris, J., Principles of Algebraic Geometry. Wiley-Interscience (1978)


The Spinor Representation of Minimal Surfaces - Kusner, Schmitt (1996)   (4 citations)  (Correct)

.... Since f ramifies at each a 2 supp P , we have r 0 = ramification index of f n: Now let f k : P 1 Gamma P( k 1 C m ) defined by f k = f f 0 : f (k) in C m be the k th associated curve of f , and use the Plucker formulas (an extension of the Riemann Hurwitz formula see [9]) which on CP 1 are Gammad k Gamma1 2d k Gamma d k 1 Gamma 2 = r k ; where d k is the degree of f k , and r k is the ramification index of f k . In the table below, multiplying the numbers on the left by the inequalities on the right and adding yields d 0 (m n) m Gamma 1) m: But n ....

Griffiths, P., and Harris, J. Principles of algebraic geometry. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1978.


Residual Resultant over the Projective Plane and the.. - Buse (2001)   (Correct)

No context found.

Griffiths, P., and Harris, J. Principles of algebraic geometry. Wiley-interscience, London-New-York, 1978.


Numerical Campedelli surfaces cannot have the symmetric - Group As The   (Correct)

No context found.

Ph. Griffiths, J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, J.Wiley and Sons, New York 1978.


Monge-Ampère currents over pseudoconcave spaces - Dingoyan (1999)   (Correct)

No context found.

P. Griffiths and J. Harris. Principles of Algebraic Geometry. Wiley Classics Library. John Wiley and Sons, inc, 1 edition, 1994.


Unknown - Filename Algebraic Tex   (Correct)

No context found.

Griffiths, P., Harris, J.: Principles of algebraic geometry. New York: Wiley 1978.


Some Applications of Bezoutians in Effective Algebraic Geometry - Elkadi, Mourrain (1998)   (1 citation)  (Correct)

No context found.

Ph. GriOEths and J. Harris. Principles of Algebraic Geometry. Wiley Interscience, New York, 1978.


Bifurcations sets of the Sretensky axial symmetric gyrostat - Dekkaki Lassas Ouazzani-T-H   (Correct)

No context found.

Griffiths P., and Harris J., Principles of Algebraic Geometry (Wiley Interscience, Newyork, N.Y) (1978).


Classical Differential Geometry Through Loewner's Inequality.. - Mikhail Ka Tz   (Correct)

No context found.

Griffiths, P.; Harris, J.: Principles of algebraic geometry. Pure and Applied Mathematics. Wiley-Interscience [John Wiley & Sons], New York, 1978.


Transvectants, Modular Forms, and the Heisenberg Algebra - Peter Olver School   (Correct)

No context found.

Griffiths, P.A., and Harris, J., Principles of Algebraic Geometry, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978. 26


Evaluation of Fermion Loops by Higher Residues - Joel Feldman Department (1996)   (1 citation)  (Correct)

No context found.

P. Griffiths, J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, Wiley-Interscience, 1978.


Pieri-Type Formulas For Maximal Isotropic - Grassmannians Via Triple   (Correct)

No context found.

P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, J. Wiley and Sons, 1978.


Conformal and Harmonic Measures on Laminations Associated.. - Kaimanovich, Lyubich (2002)   (1 citation)  (Correct)

No context found.

Ph. Griffiths, J. Harris. Principles of Algebraic Geometry. Wiley, N.Y., 1978.


More Congruences for Numerical Data of an Embedded Resolution - Veys   (Correct)

No context found.

P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, John Wiley and Sons, 1978.


The Wronski map and Grassmannians of real codimension 2.. - Eremenko, Gabrielov (2001)   (Correct)

No context found.

Ph. Gri#ths and J. Harris, Principles of algebraic geometry, Willey, NY, 1978.


Moving Frames and Singularities of Prolonged Group Actions - Olver (2000)   (2 citations)  (Correct)

No context found.

Griffiths, P.A., and Harris, J., Principles of Algebraic Geometry, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978.


Moving Frames and Joint Differential Invariants - Peter Olver School   (Correct)

No context found.

Griffiths, P.A., and Harris, J., Principles of Algebraic Geometry, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978.


Constant terms of powers of a Laurent polynomial - Duistermaat And Wilberd   (Correct)

No context found.

P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978


Formulas For Lagrangian And Orthogonal Degeneracy Loci: The.. - Pragacz, al. (1996)   (11 citations)  (Correct)

No context found.

P. Griffiths, J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, Wiley-Interscience, 1978.


A Dolbeault-type double complex on quaternionic manifolds - Widdows (2002)   (Correct)

No context found.

P. Griffiths, J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, John Wiley and Sons (1978).


Holomorphic Motion Of Circles Through Affine Bundles - Barrett   (Correct)

No context found.

P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of algebraic geometry, John Wiley & Sons, 1978.


Polynomial Interpolation in Several Variables - Gasca, Sauer (1999)   (9 citations)  (Correct)

No context found.

P. Griffiths and J. Harris. Principles of Algebraic Geometry. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978.


The Geometry of Syzygies - A second course in Commutative.. - Eisenbud (2001)   (Correct)

No context found.

P.A. Griffiths, J. Harris. Principles of Algebraic Geometry. WileyInterscience, New York, 1978.


The Complex Geometry of the Spherical Pendulum - Beukers, Cushman   (Correct)

No context found.

Griffiths, P. and Harris, J., Principles of Algebraic Geometry, Wiley, N.Y., 1978.


Nahm's equations and generalized C. Neumann's System - Saksida   (Correct)

No context found.

P.A. Griffiths, J. Harris, Principles of Algebraic Geometry, John Wiley & Sons (1978)

First 50 documents  Next 50

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC