| Bybee, J.L. (1988) `Morphology as lexical organization,' in M.Hammond and M. Noonan, eds. Theoretical Morphology, San Diego, CA: Academic Press. |
....theory, words sharing a stem can be seen as in correspondence over that portion, and similarly for words sharing an affix. This conception, independently proposed in the context of an analysis of English stress in PES, turns out to be in essence the conception long 7 advanced by J. Bybee (see Bybee, 1988, 1995) In turn, the latter seems implementable along OT lines under Correspondence theory. The proposed conception also has points in common with Aronoff s (1976, 1994) word based morphology. The type of misapplication of phonology reviewed above, then, suggests, by invoking OO F constraints, ....
Bybee, J.L. (1988) `Morphology as lexical organization,' in M.Hammond and M. Noonan, eds. Theoretical Morphology, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
....stems ending in T greatly outnumber those ending in t , to the point where there are literally none of the latter. When a new form like bilat is heard, analogy to similar existing lexical items is going to produce an underlying representation with T . On analogy, see e.g. Skousen 1989, Bybee 1988, Steriade 1997, among many others. In Finnish, there are apparently no exceptions to assibilation in derived environments. But in Turkish, there are plenty of exceptions to Velar Deletion in derived environments. Analogy on the fly is particularly clearly at work in the latter case, where some ....
Bybee, Joan. 1988. Morphology as lexical organization. In Michael Hammond and Michael Noonan, eds., Theoretical approaches to morphology. San Diego: Academic Press. 119-41.
....necessary to deal with allomorphy, but also sufficient, making underlying representation (UR) unnecessary. The resulting conception is one in which words are mentally represented only in their surface forms and are connected to one another to the extent that they share sound and meaning, as in Bybee s (1988, 1995) Network model, and Derwing (1990) The connections simulate a morphological parse, and also serve as the vehicle for the enforcement of OO F constraints relevant to the phonology. Within this general setting, the specific goal of the article is now to show that 4 morphologically complex ....
Bybee, J.L. (1988) `Morphology as lexical organization,' in M.Hammond and M. Noonan , eds. Theoretical Morphology, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
....overapplication of an add ed rule. For example, children produce stem and past tense forms like eat ated, sit sit or pick pack (Marchman [1988] In many respects, these irregularizations can be seen to be analogues to the mappings between stem and past tense of English irregular verbs (Bybee [1988]; MacWhinney [1987] Second, as Pinker Prince [1988] have noted, the set of irregular verbs in English (approximately 150 altogether) is not an unstructured list. Rather, it consists of a number of subregularities between the phonological form of the irregular stem and the type of ....
Bybee, J. L. [1988], "Morphology as lexical organization, " in Theoretical morphology, M. Hammond & M. Noonan, eds., Academic Press, New York, NY.
....be more or less evident, depending on how many types of words they generalize over, how frequently those occur in the language, how noticeable the morphological effects are, and how uniform the semantic changes are that go along with them. This general conception of morphology is also advocated in Bybee 1988 and Bybee 1994. Bybee also does not think that a symbolic rule mechanism is needed. She shares the view that schemata are sufficient to explain the morphological data, and that type frequency plays a crucial role in determining productivity. But she has a somewhat different conception of ....
Bybee, Joan (1988): "Morphology as Lexical Organization". In: M. Hammond & M. Noonan (eds.), Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics. San Diego: Academic Press.
.... STRENGTH IN NUMBERS LUIGI BURZIO Introduction The present work is grounded in a general conception of the lexicon which is fully parallel, in the sense that it postulates no underlying representation and expresses morphological affiliations by means of connections among surface forms, as in Bybee s (1988, 1995) Network model . Beside being relevant to morphology, the latter connections are targeted by certain constraints that play a role in determining phonological form. These are the output to output faithfulness (henceforth OO F ) constraints also proposed (under various names) in the works ....
Bybee, J.L. (1988) `Morphology as lexical organization,' in M.Hammond and M.
....become inactive. They therefore offer the possibility of accounting for fully and partly productive rules, as well as for word formation in analogy to inactive patterns in a uniform fashion. Because the rules are conceived of as generalizations emerging from existing lexical entries (cf. also Bybee 1988), the relationship of lexicalized forms to the rule is expressed in a very direct way. For a computational lexicon the irregular forms cannot simply be ignored, because they will be the words most likely to occur. Lexicalized forms, which normally exhibit idiosyncrasies in at least one respect, ....
....of words analyzed by each type, making only the most prominent pattern the one according to which new words are to be generated. This would come close to an implementation of the idea of inductively forming and using generalizations. The need to include frequency information is also emphasized by Bybee (1988). But it cannot be the only criterion since there are unproductive affixes (e.g. lich) in which nevertheless a large number of existing words end. These would require an even more complex algorithm taking into consideration also the semantic coherence of words ending in a particular suffix. For a ....
Bybee, Joan (1988): "Morphology as Lexical Organization". In: M. Hammond & M. Noonan (eds.), Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics . San Diego: Academic Press.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC