206 citations found. Retrieving documents...
Davis R. and Smith R. G. Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving. In Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pages 333--356. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1988. REFERENCES

 Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check  

This paper is cited in the following contexts:

First 50 documents  Next 50

A Review of Machine Learning in Scheduling - Aytug, Bhattacharyya, Kochlet.. (1994)   (3 citations)  (Correct)

....VOL. 41. NO. 2, MAY 1994 The methods used to learn include a large number of different approaches. Several researchers learn from experiments on a simulation model. See, for example, 1] 2] who use statistical inference; 38] 47] 52] 60] who use inductive learning methods; and [9], who learn with neural nets. One type of learning, called cased based or exemplarbased reasoning, uses past situations to infer actions for new situations [30] Koton [25] 26] notes that these approaches have merit when similar problems recur, when the domain is stable under perturbations and ....

....avenues are suggested. Another case based reasoner for scheduling large scale aidift operations was proposed by Koton [25] 26] A neural network approach to learning appropriate criteria weights for multiple criteria decision making for job shop scheduling is presented in Chryssolouris et al. [9]. A threelayer network using back propagation algorithm is applied to learn weights to be assigned to local work center scheduling criteria so as to meet a set of global performance objectives. A system simulation first provides the performance measure values for different operational policies ....

R. Davis and R. Smith, "Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 20, pp. 63-109, 1983.


Unifying Agent Systems - d'Inverno, Luck (2003)   (Correct)

....levels of abstraction to detailed formal specifications of three distinct applications. The first is dMARS (the 20 distributed Multi Agent Reasoning System) which has been applied in perhaps the most significant multi agent applications to date. The second is the well known contract net protocol [51, 52, 12], which again is situated in the domain of practical implemented systems. The third application is the social dependence network[49, 50] which is a structure that forms the basis of a computational model of Social Power Theory[7, 8] These networks allow agents to reason about and understand the ....

....of the various aspects of this work, but we hope that it has been possible to show how increasing levels of analysis and detail enable transition between abstract conceptual infrastructure and implemented system. 5. 2 Application 2: The Contract Net Protocol The Contract Net as described by Smith [12, 51, 52] is a collection of nodes that cooperate in achieving goals which, together, satisfy some high level goal or task. Each node may be either a manager who monitors task execution and processes the results, or a contractor who performs the actual execution of the task. 5.2.1 The Contract Net ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

R. Davis and R. G. Smith. Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 20(1):63--109, 1983.


Modularity in Interaction Protocols - Vitteau, Huget (2003)   (2 citations)  (Correct)

....usually three parameters: the sender, the receiver and the content of the message. The semantics of the parameters gives the semantics associated to these parameters. It helps agents to ll the messages correctly. Thanks to its expressibility, it is possible to represent the Contract Net protocol [5] as a micro protocol. The microprotocol is given on Figure 1. We do not explain in detail this micro protocol, readers are urge to read [15] The important elements in the de nition eld are the synchronization mechanism, the time management, alternatives and the exception. The keyword token is ....

R. Davis and R. G. Smith. Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem-solving. Arti cial Intelligence, 20:63-109, 1983.


Enterprise Management Network Architecture - The.. - Roboam, Fox, Sycara (1990)   (1 citation)  (Correct)

....substantial. Thus, the distribution in fine grained applications is at the statement level as opposed to task level distribution. 13. Parallel Distributed Processing Systems Decentralized, fine grained systems with tight coupling are oien referred to as parallel distributed processing systems [26, 9, 6, 21]. The processing aspect emphasizes concurrent execution of functionally decomposable tasks. The objective in parallel distributed processing systems is usually load balancing of shared informational and physical resources. In distributed processing systems, the computational or syntactic ....

Davis, 1, and Smith, PG. Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving. Artificial Intelligence 20:63-109, 1983.


A Simple and Scalable Approach for Human-System Interaction - Tews, Sukhatme, Mataric (2003)   (Correct)

....Discrete services provide only the immediate status of a sensor while continuous services provide streaming updates of their task status. Each system is briefly described next. 1) Murdoch continuous services A task allocation system, Murdoch [19] 20] is a form of a Contract Net Protocol [21] used to control three robots in this experiment. Each robot is capable of carrying out three tasks: random walk, target tracking, and delivery. Random walking requires a robot to wander randomly and provides location information to the user. For target tracking, the robot acquires and follows a ....

R. Davis and R. Smith, "Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving, Artificial Intelligence, vol. 20, no. 1, 1983, pp. 63- 109.


Multi-Stage Cooperation Algorithm and Tools for Agent-Based.. - Sheremetov, Nunez   (Correct)

....the basic idea behind negotiation is reaching a consensus. Probably, the most commonly used negotiation protocols for task and resource allocation and coordination among agents is the Contract Net Protocol (CNP) and auction based protocol, both developed for centralized way of resource allocation [7, 21, 24]. Recently, these protocols were investigated by a number of authors, where it was shown that they propose an efficient way for self interested agent behavior coordination [8, 22] In this paper, we consider the use of multistage negotiations algorithm among agents of MAS that have to solve a ....

Davis, R & Smith, R. G. Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving, Artificial Intelligence, vol. 20, no. 1, 1983, pp. 63-109.


Manufacturing Experience with the Contract Net - Parunak (1987)   (31 citations)  (Correct)

....M. N. Huhns, Editor, Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pages 285 310. Pitman, London, 1987. Chapter 10 Manufacturing Experience with the Contract Net Abstract We are implementing a control system for a discrete manufacturing environment that partitions tasks using a negotiation protocol like the contract net described by Smith and Davis [24,25,26,3] The ....

....285 310. Pitman, London, 1987. Chapter 10 Manufacturing Experience with the Contract Net Abstract We are implementing a control system for a discrete manufacturing environment that partitions tasks using a negotiation protocol like the contract net described by Smith and Davis [24,25,26,3] The application doma n differs in interesting ways from those to which contract nets have previously been applied. This report outlines our architecture, summarizes some differences between the factory . floor and other problem domains, and discusses how we accommodate these distinctive ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

R. Davis and R. G. Smith, "Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 20, pp. 63-109, 1983.


Unknown - Laura Bocchi Paolo   (Correct)

No context found.

Davis R. and Smith R. G. Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving. In Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pages 333--356. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1988. REFERENCES


Task Assignment for a Physical Agent Team via a Dynamic - Forward Reverse Auction (2005)   (Correct)

No context found.

R. Davis and R.G. Smith, "Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving," Artificial Intelligence, 20:63-109, 1983.


ATSpace: A Middle Agent to Support Application Oriented - Matchmaking And Brokering (2004)   (Correct)

No context found.

R. Davis and R. Smith. Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving. Artificial Intelligence, 20(1):63-- 109, January 1983.


Coordination Of Supply Webs Based On Dispositive Protocols - Stockheim, Schwind.. (2002)   (1 citation)  (Correct)

No context found.

Davis, R. and Smith, R. (1983). Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving, In: Artificial Intelligence 20, pp. 63-109.


Affective Task Allocation for Distributed Multi-Robot Teams - Gage, Murphy, Valavanis.. (2004)   (Correct)

No context found.

R. Davis and R. G. Smith, "Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 63--109, 1983.


ATSpace: A Middle Agent to Support Application Oriented.. - Jang, Momen, Agha (2004)   (Correct)

No context found.

R. Davis and R. Smith. Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving. Artificial Intelligence, 20(1):63-- 109, January 1983.


ATSpace: A Middle Agent to Support Application Oriented.. - Jang, Momen, Agha (2004)   (Correct)

No context found.

R. Davis and R. Smith. Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving. Artificial Intelligence, 20(1):63-- 109, January 1983.


Improving User Satisfaction in Agent-Based Electronic.. - Reputation Modelling And (2004)   (Correct)

No context found.

R. Davis, and R. G. Smith. Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving. In 7 In [7], we present further comparison with the model of Vidal and Durfee, including results to show the relative advantage of our model with respect to both user satisfaction and computational cost. Artificial Intelligence, 20(1): 63-109, January 1983.


Interactive Multi-Attribute Electronic Negotiations in the.. - Rebstock, Thun (2003)   (Correct)

No context found.

Davis, R. and Smith, R.G. (1983): Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving. In: Artificial Intelligence 20 (1), 63-109.


Achieving Economic and Computational Efficiency - Parkes   (Correct)

No context found.

R Davis and R G Smith. Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving. In A Bond and L Gasser, editors, Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pages 333--356. Morgan Kaufmann, CA, 1988.


The DARX Framework: Adapting Fault Tolerance for Agent Systems - Marin (2003)   (Correct)

No context found.

R. Davis and R. Smith. Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 20:63--109, 1983.


Sold!: Auction Methods for Multirobot Coordination - Gerkey, Mataric (2002)   (Correct)

No context found.

R. Davis and R. G. Smith, "Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving," Artif. Intell., vol. 20, pp. 63--109, 1983.


A Generic Framework for Simulation of Supply Networks with - Bargaining Agents Szirbik   (Correct)

No context found.

Davis, Randall and Smith, R.G. (1983), Negotiation as a metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving, Artificial Intelligence, 20:69-109.


A Tutorial On Agent Communication And - Knowledge Sharing Presented (2002)   (Correct)

No context found.

Davis, R., and R.G. Smith: " Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed problem Solving I Artificial Intelligence", 06, 1(1993), 63-109..


Modelling Social Agents: Towards Deliberate Communication - Dignum (1999)   (Correct)

No context found.

R. Davis and R. Smith. Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, vol.20, pages 63-109, 1983.


A User-Adaptive Interface Agency for - Interaction With Virtual   (Correct)

No context found.

R. Davis and G. Smith. Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving. In A.H. Bond and L. Gasser, editors, Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pages 333--356. Morgan Kaufmann, 1983.


Applying Coordination Mechanisms for Dependency Relationships.. - Chen, Decker (2002)   (1 citation)  (Correct)

No context found.

R. Davis and R. G. Smith. Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 20(1):63--109, Jan. 1983.


Distributed Enactment of Multiagent Workflows: Temporal Logic for.. - Singh (2003)   (1 citation)  (Correct)

No context found.

R. Davis and R. G. Smith. Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 20:63--109, 1983.

First 50 documents  Next 50

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC