G.R. Finnie, G.E. Wittig, D.I. Petkov, Prioritizing software development productivity factors using the analytic hierarchy process, J. Systems Software 22 (2) (1993) 129--139. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
OTSO: A Systematic Process for Reusable Software Component.. - Kontio (1995) (2 citations) (Correct)
....Process (AHP) for consolidating the evaluation data for decision making purposes. The AHP technique was developed by Thomas Saaty for multiple criteria decision making situations [37,38] The technique has been widely and successfully used in several fields [39] including software engineering [19] and software selection [23,32] It has been reported to be an effective technique in multiple criteria decision making situations in several case studies and experiments [13,20,39,42] Due to the hierarchical treatment of our criteria, AHP fits well into our evaluation process as well. AHP is ....
....criteria decision making problem into a criteria hierarchy. At each level in the hierarchy the relative importance of factors is assessed by comparing them in pairs. Finally, the alternatives are compared in pairs with respect to the criteria. The following are the main steps in applying AHP [19,38]: 1. Define a hierarchy of factors that influence the decision, resulting in a hierarchical structure of factors that have alternatives as the leaf nodes in the hierarchy 2. Define the importance of factors on each level 3. Define the preferences of alternatives 4. Check the consistency of ....
G. R. Finnie, G. E. Wittig, and D. I. Petkov, Prioritizing Software Development Productivity Factors Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 22, pp. 129-139, 1995.
Using treemaps to visualize the Analytic Hierarchy Process - Asahi, Turo, Shneiderman (1995) (3 citations) (Correct)
.... AHP suits a wide range of applications including transport study, technological choice, resource allocation and organization planning [7] The method has been gaining popularity as a viable decision support tool in a number of fields such as economics, politics, marketing, sociology and management [2, 14]. A description of the procedure is given here in five stages: 1. Criteria are identified from the problem space. A hierarchical structure is formed by using the overall goal as a root of the decision tree and making each major criterion a child. Each criterion in turn is detailed to provide ....
Finnie, G.R., Wittig, G.E. and Petkov, D.I. Prioritizing software development productivity factors using the analytic hierarchy process. The Journal of Systems and Software 22, 1983, pp. 129-137.
An Evaluation of Methods for Prioritizing Software.. - Karlsson, Wohlin, Regnell (1998) (2 citations) (Correct)
No context found.
G.R. Finnie, G.E. Wittig, D.I. Petkov, Prioritizing software development productivity factors using the analytic hierarchy process, J. Systems Software 22 (2) (1993) 129--139.
Information Framework For Composite Packaged Software Synthesis - Levin (Correct)
No context found.
G.R. Finnie, G.E. Wittig, and D.I. Petkov, Prioritizing Software Development Productivity Factors Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. J. Syst. Software, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 129-139, 1993.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC