Akshar Bharati, Chaitanya V and Sangal R. Natural Language Processing: A Paninian Perspective. Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi, India, 1995. Home/Search Document Details and Download
Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
ProGram: A Grammar-Based Method for Specification and Hardware.. - Öberg (1999) (Correct)
....is dedicated to related work in grammar based Interface and Protocol Synthesis. Grammars define the syntax of languages, both natural languages and those used by computers. The first known grammar was the one invented by Panini to describe the structure of the Sanskrit language in ca 500 BC [47]. In many respects, it had many similarities with the modern grammars used to describe parsers of computer languages. Grammars define allowed patterns and are as such not restricted to defining languages where it specifies legally allowed patterns of words. In Mechanical CAD, they are used as a ....
A. Bharati, V. Chaitanya, R. Sangal, "Natural Language Processing - A Paninian Perspective ", Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, 1995, ISBN 81-203-0921-9.
Pragmatics versus Purism - taking the best of both worlds - Pedersen, Purchase (1999) (Correct)
....complexity introduced by these attempts to extend the coverage of PSGs to free word order languages has significant impact on the cost of developing NLP systems based upon these theories. Barton et al. BBR87] discussed the efficiency problems of parsing ID LP grammars, and Bharati et al. [BCS96] suggest that any attempt to extend Tree Adjoining Grammars to handle free word order languages might suffer the same fate. 1.1.1 Dependency Grammars Dependency Grammars, on the other hand, provide a more appropriate formalism for representing free word order languages. However, when faced with ....
....TAG and Meaning Text Theory. The Paninian Grammar framework is based upon the work of the Sanskrit grammarian Panini and linguistic tradition following him, dating from the fourth century B.C. This approach has been adapted to modern Indian languages for the the purpose of machine translation [BCS94, BCS96]. It makes extensive use of the highly inflected nature of Indian languages, and employs Panini s insights into the separation of deep grammatical relationships from the surface syntax. PG belongs to the class of Dependency Grammars, and makes use of syntactico semantically labeled relations ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
A. Bharati, V. Chaitanya, and R. Sangal. Natural Language Processing - A Paninian Perspective. Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi, 1996.
Natural Language Generation for English to Hindi.. - Rao, Bhattacharya.. (1998) (Correct)
No context found.
Akshar Bharati, Chaitanya V and Sangal R. Natural Language Processing: A Paninian Perspective. Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi, India, 1995.
A Practical Framework for Syntactic Transfer of.. - Rao, Mohanraj.. (Correct)
No context found.
Bharati A, Chaitanya V and Sangal R. Natural Language Processing: A Paninian Perspective. Prentice Hall of India, 1995.
Unsupervised Learning of Morphology for Building Lexicon.. - Sharma, Kalita, Das (2002) (Correct)
No context found.
Bharati, Akshar, Chaitanya, Vineet and San- gal, Rajeev, 1995 Natural Language Processing - A Paninian Perspective. Prentice-Hall of India Pvt Ltd., New Delhi
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC