Keller, R., "Defining operationality for EBL," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, 227-242 , 1988.  Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
B-Learn II: Combining sensing and action - Kaiser, Giordana, Nuttin, Lopes (Correct)
....3.2. 1 Supervision in Assembly The work conducted in the project, towards an architecture for supervision of assembly and manipulation tasks, considers, at different planning levels, functions for dispatching actions, monitoring their execution, and diagnosing and recovering from failures [70, 82, 84]. An action sequence planning approach, based on assembly precedences, was developed. The adaptation of the hardware required considerable effort, namely regarding monitoring and guarded movements. Our main concern is the acquisition of knowledge about the tasks and the environment to support ....
....is made taking into account the contributions of each of the added facts to each of the goals currently being considered. Several developments on learning of planning knowledge for error recovery, building on the early works of STRIPS PLANNEX [37] HACKER [133] and, more recently, EBL [70], still have to be further refined until publication. 4 RESULTS 24 In initial work concerning the diagnosis functionality [26, 82, 84] an inductive learning algorithm [48] was applied. The algorithm is simple and, compared to ID3 [27] or other well known symbolic inductive learning algorithms, ....
R. Keller. Defining operationality for EBL. Artificial Intelligence, 35, 1988.
Multi-Strategy Learning and Theory Revision - Saitta, Botta, Neri (1993) (9 citations) (Correct)
.... structural information about objects and definitions of relevant categories and their taxonomic organization; but, more importantly, P contains a set of rules aimed at describing the manifestations of abstractly defined concepts, i.e. re expressing them in terms of operational predicates (Keller, 1988). The knowledge P, even if necessary in order to fill the gap between abstract entities and their possible manifestations, can only explain how things happen, but not why. Then, pragmatically, a phenomenon will be considered justified only if it is explained by C, i.e. if it is covered by a ....
Keller, R. (1988). Defining operationality for EBL. Artificial Intelligence, 35, 227-242.
. Prentice Hall - Software Series John (1991) (20 citations) (Correct)
No context found.
Keller, R., "Defining operationality for EBL," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, 227-242 , 1988.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC