Rosenman, M.A. & Gero, J.S. The what, the how and the why in design, Applied Artificial Intelligence, 1994, 8(2):199-218. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Multilevel Logic Programming for Software Engineering.. - Bielikova, Navrat (1997) (Correct)
....programming technique. Our approach is based on the reflection technique (Lamma et al., 1991) The technique has been implemented in Prolog. The prototype is meta interpreted. The proposal of a multilevel logic programming technique falls into the area of the methods of structuring of logic programs (Bugliesi et al., 1994). Program can be divided 16 Multilevel Logic Programming for Software Engineering into modules. Moreover, it can be organized into levels. Dividing programs into modules is the well known technique which helps cope with the complexity of the problem. Frequently, development of modules refers to ....
R.A. ROSENMAN, J.S. GERO. The what, the how, and the why in design. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 8:199--218, 1994.
An Exploration Into Evolutionary Models for Non-Routine Design - Rosenman (1997) (3 citations) Self-citation (Rosenman) (Correct)
No context found.
Rosenman, M.A. & Gero, J.S. The what, the how and the why in design, Applied Artificial Intelligence, 1994, 8(2):199-218.
The Generation Of Form Using An Evolutionary Approach - Rosenman (1997) (8 citations) Self-citation (Rosenman) (Correct)
No context found.
Rosenman, M. A. and Gero, J. S. (1994). The what, the how, and the why in design, Applied Artificial Intelligence, 8(2):199-218.
Modelling Multiple Views Of Design Objects In A Collaborative.. - Rosenman Key (1996) (2 citations) Self-citation (Gero) (Correct)
No context found.
Rosenman and Gero (1994). The what, the how, and the why in design, Applied Artificial Intelligence, 8(2):199-218.
Collaborative Cad Modelling In Mutidisciplinary Design Domains - Rosenman, Gero Self-citation (Rosenman Gero) (Correct)
....a design object reflect the concerns of the various designers and their intent. There have been various attempts at defining the concepts of purpose, function, behaviour and structure (Bobrow, 1984; DeKleer and Brown, 1984; Rodenacker, 1984; Umeda et al. 1990; Hundal, 1991; Gero et al. 1992; Rosenman and Gero, 1994). The approach taken here follows the following definitions: purpose: is the reason why an artefact exists or why it is what it is; function: is what is performed by an artefact; behaviour: is the manner in which an artefact acts under specified conditions; structure: is what constitutes an ....
Rosenman, M. A. and Gero, J. S.: 1994, The what, the how, and the why in design, Applied Artificial Intelligence, 8(2), 199-218.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC