Lehman, M. M. Process improvement---the way forward. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering; 7th International Conference, CAiSE'95 (Jyvaskyla, Finland, Jun 12--16  Home/Search Document Details and Download
Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Cognitive Support in Software Engineering Tools: A.. - Andrew Walenstein (2002) (1 citation) (Correct)
.... not work alone, and that significant intervention is required on the part of the developer (e.g. in reverse engineering [524, 642] Despite the strong focus on formalization and automation by researchers, most software development activities are not in immediate danger of being fully automated [78, 378]. Even though automation and formalization are clearly important foci for tools research, it is entirely possible to concentrate too steadfastly on that goal. In fact, successful automation invariably exposes its own weaknesses. Brooks argued that good design removes inessential complexity [78] ....
Lehman, M. M. Process improvement---the way forward. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering; 7th International Conference, CAiSE'95 (Jyvaskyla, Finland, Jun 12--16
A Literature Review on the Quantification of Software Change - Powell (1996) (Correct)
....a linear effect of project pressure on productivity (or indeed ignoring its effects completely) Until these low level empirical relationships are more accurately understood, their potential for control and prediction will be inherently limited. This view is reflected by the current work of Lehman [Lehman95] who is undertaking a new investigation of the role of feedback in the software process (he acknowledges that the importance of feedback has been apparent at least as far back as 1969) Lehman s earlier investigations into software system stability and evolution (Section 2.1) identified both ....
M. M. Lehman, "Process Improvement - The Way Forward," 7th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, CAiSE'95, Jvyaskyla, Finland, June, 1995 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science 932 (eds. Livari J, Lyytinen K, Rossi M).
Process Modelling - Where Next - Lehman (1997) (1 citation) Self-citation (Lehman) (Correct)
....The resultant FEAST 1 project in the Department of Computing at Imperial College is now investigating this hypothesis. This short presentation is not the place for a detailed review of the project or to present our results to date. It is, however, appropriate to remark that early results [18, 19] are encouraging. So far the analysis has concentrated on the evolution of the Logica plc FW financial transaction system now in its tenth release. The data indicates that the evolution of this system has characteristics similar to those of OS 360 [16] The growth trend ripple as in figure 1, for ....
Lehman M M, Process improvement - The Way Forward, Invited Keynote Address, Proc. Brazilian Softw. Eng. Conf., 14 - 18 Oct. 1996, 23 - 35
The Impact of Feedback in the Global Software Process - Lehman, Ramil (1998) (2 citations) Self-citation (Mm) (Correct)
....structures and application areas, that the global benefit derived from the introduction of individual improvements is more limited than might be expected from its local impact in the process. This suggests that some intrinsic common property is constraining improvement of the global process [leh95,96d], the process as observed from outside. The feedback nature of the software process and its implications were identified over 25 years ago [bel72, leh78] The FEAST hypothesis (section 6) identifies this attribute and its consequences as the constraint. The laws of software evolution are now ....
Lehman MM, Process Improvement - the Way Forward, in Iivari J et al (eds.), Proc. CAiSE 95, Jyvaskyla, Finland, June 1995, Lect. Notes in Comp. Sci. 932, Springer Verlag, pp. 1 - 11
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC