C.S. Peirce (1958) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Edited by C. Harstshorne, P. Weiss & A. Burks.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

.... Such a process is Peircean in spirit: although our perception of the real world phenomena arises from our thoughts, which are facts ( 12] only those thoughts will appear in our conception which are forced by the hard reality ( 1] A related problem discussed by Peirce is perceptual judgment ([7]5.15) What makes Peirce s framework especially attractive, is the fact that it allows for a single approach which can be uniformly applied for modeling the external input and internal knowledge, as well as, their relation. The purpose of this paper is an attempt to give a Peircean account of ....

....which can be uniformly applied for modeling the external input and internal knowledge, as well as, their relation. The purpose of this paper is an attempt to give a Peircean account of this last aspect of relation. An essential constituent of the above approach is Peirce s classification of signs ([7]2.243) which consists of nine kinds of aspects, or signs, that can be distinguished in the real world. Another component is the concept of a sign interaction ( 3] which reveals how signs can emerge from other signs. Notice that sign interactions are a consequence of the inherently dynamic ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

Peirce, C.S.: Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1931)

....system called Escher to jump to Higher Order Logic, based on Church s theory of types [Church 1940] a work which resembles high order logic reasoning systems like HOL. Abduction (Sherlock Holmes intelligence [Josephson Josephson 1994] is a notion introduced by Peirce (1839 1914) He asserted [Peirce 1867 1960] that neither deduction nor induction can help us to unveil the internal structure of meaning. Abduction is the process of making assumptions to explain some facts. It is described as inference to the best explanation [Harman 1965] A counterpart of ILP, ALP (Abductive Logic Programming) Kakas ....

Peirce, C.S. "Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce" Cambridge. Harvard University Press 1960.

....[7] an intensional update is considered as a general 36 property, defined by means of a formula involving quantifiers and meta predicates, specifying the expected effect of a desired change of a logic program. The realization of this kind of operations is performed by means of abductive reasoning [28] expressed as a form of deduction, and the method is proved to be sound and complete. A concept of minimal realization of an intensional update is introduced, but notions like those of determinism and representability are not addressed. Kakas and Mancarella [19] study updates of knowledge bases ....

C.S. Peirce. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Volume 2, C. Hartshorn et al., editors, Harvard University Press, 1958.

....algebras of relations of higher ranks to emphasise that our relations may be binary, ternary, four ary, etc. Algebras of relations in this sense have been investigated since the middle of the last century, beginning with works of De Morgan, Peirce, Macfarlane, Schroder and Lowenheim. e.g. Peirce [Pei33] studies n ary relations for arbitrary n. There has always been an emphasis on investigating the equations axiomatizing the class(es) of algebras of relations. In the last century, such equations were called laws (e.g. distributive law , De Morgan law , Peircian law ) The motivation for ....

C.S. Peirce. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, volume III. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1933.

....the iconicity of the visual signs needs a learning phase to be understood. Think of the desktop icons: in semiotics this term describes a particular kind of sign which has the signifier similar to the content (see Peirce s theory on the three forms of sign representation: iconic, indexic, symbolic [16]) in interface design icons are similar to the object they represent, but we need a phase of learning to understand this codification. HCI aims to create systems we can use without learning, but we think this approach is too radical. We are able to learn, so why completely avoid this process ....

Peirce C.S., Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Harward University Press, MA, 1931-1958

....via mediation, and (3) signs arise from a dichotomous relation of perceived qualities. We argue that on the basis of these assumptions and the properties of signs, a simple parsing algorithm can be de ned. 2 Sign and perception In our analysis we follow the principles of Peirce s semiotic ([5], 7] Accordingly, a sign signi es its object to an agent in some sense, which is called the interpretant of the sign. The inseparable relation of sign, object and interpretant (each of which is a sign, recursively) is called the triadic relation of sign. In this paper we start from the ....

....that also a dicent or a symbol can be coerced to an argument, but such a sign will be a degenerate one, semiotically, because an argument must 1 Lexical ambiguity of a symbol is treated by introducing a unique denotation for each meaning. represent the observed phenomenon in its character ([5]) and has to include both A and B. Such signs of the input as a whole, are the dicent and the symbol signs. In as much as the argument arises from dicent and symbol (subject and predicate) we may conclude that, in the default case, only subject and predicate are recognised and their relation ....

Peirce, C.S.: Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1931)

....now turn to the question why these clusters, given the particular order in which they occur, do indeed define something meaningful that amounts to a definition of information retrieval system. 2 A Semiotic Model of Language In our analysis of signs we follow the principles of Peirce s semiotics ([Pei31], Tej88] Accordingly, a sign signifies its object to an agent in some sense, which is called the interpretant of the sign. The irreducible relation of sign, object and interpretant (each of which is a sign, recursively) is called the triadic relation of sign. We assume that the ground for any ....

C.S. Peirce. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1931.

....because the second conjunct follows from the definition of the predicate even. 2 Proof Plans Reasoning and searching are necessary for the solution to the problem of correcting a false conjecture. Abduction seems to be a candidate mechanism for the former. Abduction, as proposed by C.S. Peirce [13], is a fundamental form of logical inference that allows us to find hypotheses that account for some observed facts. Its simplest form is: From A B, and B Infer A as a possible justification of B Most of the mechanisms for driving the generation of abductive hypotheses are based on resolution ....

Peirce, C.S.: Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vol. 2, 193. Harston, C. and Weiss, P. (Eds.) Harvard University Press. (1959).

.... the Barbara syllogism of Aristotle, though in his later work he moved to an inferential definition of abduction, which is not about a single inference step, but about a complex inference process which consists of many steps, and the process is usually represented in FOPL [Flach and Kakas, 2000; Peirce, 1931; Wang, 2000] Currently all study of abduction use FOPL or its variations, with NAL as the only exception. For examples, see [Flach and Kakas, 2000; Michalski, 1993] NAL is designed to be a term logic for several reasons. For the language, the subject predicate form is preferred because it ....

....may satisfy the condition. In fact, this is the major reason for some people to separate hypothesis generation and hypothesis evaluation in the framework of predicate logic, a deterministic procedure can be found for the latter, but not for the former [Carnap, 1950; Flach and Kakas, 2000; Peirce, 1931; Popper, 1959] In NAL, since every piece of empirical knowledge has confidence less than 1, it may be revised by future evidence. In this sense, there is no sharp boundary between hypothesis , belief , knowledge , and fact their difference is relative and conventional. For example, we ....

C. Peirce, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 2. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1931.

....ontology merging alignment for the same reason that it doesn t dull the significance of legal decisions. An example of the second case is the concept of Mediating Entity , which appears in John Sowa s upper level ontology. This concept is derived from the work of the philosopher Charles S. Peirce [14], and it corresponds to his notion of Thirdness , i.e. anything that brings two other things into some sort of relationship. Although this notion may be philosophically indispensable, it was difficult to justify its inclusion in an engineering oriented context, and, for this reason, it was ....

Peirce, C. S. (1932) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol.2, C. Hartshorne, et al (eds.), Harvard University Press.

....[7] an intensional update is considered as a general 36 property, defined by means of a formula involving quantifiers and meta predicates, specifying the expected effect of a desired change of a logic program. The realization of this kind of operations is performed by means of abductive reasoning [28] expressed as a form of deduction, and the method is proved to be sound and complete. A concept of minimal realization of an intensional update is introduced, but notions like those of determinism and representability are not addressed. Kakas and Mancarella [19] study updates of knowledge bases ....

C.S. Peirce. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Volume 2, C. Hartshorn et al., editors, Harvard University Press, 1958.

....he mean computable The first rule of good taste in writing is to use words whose meaning will not be misunderstood; and if a reader does not know the meaning of the words, it is infinitely better that he should know he does not know it. Charles Sanders Peirce, Ethics of Terminology, [Peirce, 1960, p. 131] Worse still, the Convention leads to imprecise thinking about the basic concepts of the subject; the term recursion is often used when the concept of computability is meant. By the term recursive function does the writer mean inductively defined function or computable ....

....the life of thought and science is the life inherent in symbols; so that 314 ROBERT I. SOARE it is wrong to say that a good language is important to good thought, merely; for it is of the essence of it. Charles Sanders Peirce, The Ethics of Terminology, Volume II Elements of Logic in: [Peirce, 1960, p. 129] The supporters of Computability Theory believe that: 1) the concept (as developed in x2.1 and x3.1) of computability is the heart of the subject in virtually all its branches; other concepts (recursion, definability) are very important but not at the center; 2) computability is ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

Charles S. Peirce, Book II. Speculative grammar, Volume II: Elements of logic (C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss, editors), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England.

....language processing. Traditional language modelling takes as its starting point that hierarchical structure is somehow given. However, this assumption is sometimes too rigid, and cannot t the high exibility of language use. The approach proposed in this paper is based on Peirce s semiotic ([Pei31]) which provides us with a deeper foundation of language. In this approach, which is monostratal, hierarchical structure arises, via the interaction of language symbols, as a result of linguistic semiosis. Because interactions are events, language may be considered a set of symbol events, a ....

C.S. Peirce. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1931.

No context found.

C.S. Peirce (1958) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Edited by C. Harstshorne, P. Weiss & A. Burks.

No context found.

Peirce, C. S. (1931--1958): Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8 Volumes. C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss and A. Burks Eds. Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.

No context found.

C.S. Peirce. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1931.

No context found.

C.S. Peirce, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss Eds., 5-6, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1934-1935

No context found.

C.S. Peirce. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Volumes 1--6 edited by C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss. Cambridge, Harvard University Press. 1931--1935; and volumes 7--8 edited by A.W. Burks. Cambridge, Harvard University Press. 1958.

No context found.

C. S. S. Peirce, Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1931.

No context found.

Peirce, C.S.; "Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce", volume 5; Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1935

No context found.

Peirce, Charles S. 1958. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

No context found.

C.S. Peirce. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1931.

No context found.

Peirce, C. (1931). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

No context found.

Peirce, C.S.: Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1931)

No context found.

Peirce, C.S. "Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce" Cambridge. Harvard University Press 1960.

First 50 documents  Next 50

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC