| Hoc J. M., Green T. R. G., Samuray R. and Gillmore D. J. (Eds.) (1990): Psychology of Programming. London, Academic Press. |
....programming applications have moved away from the mathematical domain typical of early computing, the nature of the basic operations, the symbols in programming languages, and the formulations or methods of solution have all evolved. An introductory chapter to the book Psychology of Programming [17] notes that the programming has changed from describing calculations to defining functions , and then to defining and treating objects . Several contributors to that book broadly describe the cognitive challenges of programming. Examples include Programming is a human activity that is a great ....
Hoc, J.-M., Green, T.R.G., Samurcay, R. and Gilmore, D.J. (Eds) (1990). Psychology of programming. Academic Press..
....argues the case. SIDE REFERENCES OR SECONDARY REFERENCES left [71] 73] 299] 465] 418] 76] 94] 526] 466] 296] 92] 567] 498] 375] 267] 374] 257] 61] 470] 116] 667] 472] 727] 320] right [594] 432] 582] 564] 423] 741] 623] 469] 101] [307], 767] 766] 430] Table 8.1: Summary of references in Figure 8.5 distributed problem solving Larkin s display based problem solving 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1978 1986 1994 Schonpflug s study Hayes Roth et. al BB1 model Hayes Roth s opportunistic ....
Hoc, J.-M., Green, T. R. G., Samurcay, R., and Gilmore, D. J., Eds. Psychology of Programming. Academic Press Limited, San Diego, 1990.
....and psychology, such as [1, 3, 18, 19] and practitioners and managers in the industry, such as [22, 23, 25] The papers [3, 18] propose theoretical models of cognitive processes involved in program understanding. These models have been subjected to experimental analysis by other researchers [9, 20]. The experiments are typically performed in controlled environments using programs under 500 lines of code. Whether the conclusions drawn from such experiments can explain the processes involved in understanding larger programs is debatable [2] In contrast, 22, 23, 25] propose steps taken in ....
J. M. Hoc, T. Green, R. Samurcay, and D. Gilmore, editors. Psychology of Programming. Academic Press, 1990.
....the structuring of regularly used information into schemas, and the solution of design problems in terms of previously acquired and frequently modified plans. An overview of the range of research methods currently used in the psychology of programming can be found in the collection edited by Hoc, Green, Samuray and Gilmore (1990). This volume also includes a chapter by Gilmore specifically reviewing and advising on empirical research methods that are suited to investigations of programming. The predominant research technique in psychology of programming adopts the hypothesis testing methods of experimental psychology. ....
Hoc, J.-M., Green, T.R.G., Samuray, R. & Gilmore, D.J. (1990). Psychology of Programming. London: Academic Press.
....Seeing the programming plans : It has repeatedly been shown in a variety of ways that the experienced programmer comprehends a program not just as a series of statements, but as a structure of pieces working together. Each piece achieves its own goal, and together they achieve higher goals. See [6] for reviews of research on how programmers understand programs. So besides understanding the individual operations and the data structures, programmers also need to be able to understand the programming structures that have been built from them and above all, the purpose behind the ....
Hoc, J.-M., Green,T.R.G., Gilmore, D.J. and Samurçay, R. (Eds.) Psychology of Programming. London: Academic Press, 1990.
No context found.
Hoc J. M., Green T. R. G., Samuray R. and Gillmore D. J. (Eds.) (1990): Psychology of Programming. London, Academic Press.
No context found.
J.-M. Hoc, T. R. G. Green, R. Samuray and D. J. Gilmore. Psychology of Programming. Academic Press, 1990.
No context found.
Green, R. Samurcay, & D. J. Gilmore (Eds.), Psychology of Programming. New York: Academic Press. Rieman, J., Lewis, C., Young, R. M., & Polson, P. G. (1994) "Why is a raven like a writing desk"? Lessons in interface consistency and analogical reasoning from two cognitive architectures.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC