Saussure, F. de (1916). Cours de Linguistique Generale. Paris, Payot.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

.... The sliding window technique A term phrase index is derived from the notation of LA(Lexical Affinity) In linguistics, a syntagmatic lexical affinity, also termed a lexical relation, between two units of language stands for a correlation of their common appearance in the utterances of language[19]. The observation of LA s in large textual corpora has been shown to convey information on both syntactic and semantic levels and provides us with a powerful way of taking context into account[21] Ideally, LA s are extracted from a text by paring it, since two words share a lexical affinity if ....

Saussure F. Cours de Linguistique Generale, Quatrieme Edition, Paris: Librairie Payot, (1949).

.... The sliding window technique A term phrase index is derived from the notation of LA(Lexical Affinity) In linguistics, a syntagmatic lexical affinity, also termed a lexical relation, between two units of language stands for a correlation of their common appearance in the utterances of language[19]. The observation of LA s in large textual corpora has been shown to convey information on both syntactic and semantic levels and provides us with a powerful way of taking context into account[21] Ideally, LA s are extracted from a text by paring it, since two words share a lexical affinity if ....

Saussure F. Cours de Linguistique Generale, Quatrieme Edition, Paris: Librairie Payot, (1949).

....measure. This is achieved through the following scheme. Instead of the typical use 7 of single words as indexing units, our indexing unit consists of a pair of words that are linked by a lexical affinity (LA) An LA between two units of language stands for a correlation of their common appearance [Saussure 1949]. It has been described elsewhere how LAs can be extracted from text at a low cost via a = Gamma 5 word sliding window technique 2 . One key advantage of LAs over phrases is that they represent more flexible constructs, that link words not necessarily adjacent to each other (for more ....

Saussure, F. de Cours de Linguistique G'en'erale. Librairie Payot, Paris, France, quatri`eme edition, 1949.

....important feature has converged. But this historical perspective is completely irrelevant when discussing the dependency relations in the case of an organism. This argument about the independence of syncronic and diachronic analysis is not new: in connection with the science of language Saussure [3] represents the same view which is now widely accepted. 1.4 REVERSE ENGINEERING Roughly speaking, when trying to understand organisms via reverse engineering we try to reconstruct the dependency relations between the relevant features. The first difficulty is to find the relevant features. This ....

F. de Saussure. Cours de linguistique generale. Payot, Paris, 1939.

....important feature has converged. But this historical perspective is completely irrelevant when discussing the dependency relations in the case of an organism. This argument about the independence of syncronic and diachronic analysis is not new: in connection with the science of language Saussure [3] represents the same view which is now widely accepted. 1.4 REVERSE ENGINEERING Roughly speaking, when trying to understand organisms via reverse engineering we try to reconstruct the dependency relations between the relevant features. The first difficulty is to find the relevant features. This ....

F. de Saussure. Cours de linguistique generale. Payot, Paris, 1939.

....taken to model (types of) grammatically well formed linguistic entities. The distinction between the system of constraints and the collection of linguistic entities that satisfies it can be viewed as corresponding both to Chomsky s (1986a 3 ) distinction between I language and E language and to Saussure s ( 1916) 1959) distinction between langue and parole. Though only the latter is directly observable, only the former can be embodied as a mental computational system shared by members of a linguistic community. Pollard and Sag, 1994, pages 57 and 58) Thus emerges a tripartite ontology in which linguistic ....

Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de Linguistique G'en'erale. Editions Payot, Paris, France.

....nonterminals) as being the same, chunking hypothesizes that two submodels form a unit by virtue of co occurrence. 5 These two ways of creating new units of description correspond exactly to the structuralist distinction between paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations among linguistic elements (de Saussure 1916; Hjelmslev 1953) A more explicit terminology would therefore use paradigmatic merging for the standard nonterminal merging operation, and syntagmatic merging for the chunking operation. However, we will keep the short names merging and chunking both for brevity and to highlight the ....

DE SAUSSURE, FERDINAND. 1916. Cours de linguistique generale. Paris: Payot.

....The difference between a child and each of its siblings. Example: Keeping the same example again, the difference between mental state and, e.g. physical state, is that it involves a mental object instead of a physical object. The Opposition Principle is imported from structural linguistics [25, 26], where the meaning of a term consists in the differences it has with others. Roughly speaking, to express something, we choose a linguistic realization and, as a consequence, discard the others. The meaning of the selected term comes from the fact that we invest this term with something specific ....

de Saussure F. Cours de Linguistique G'en'erale. Payot, Paris, 1985.

....meaning but, rather, as a process in which meaning is created through the interaction of the user and the images. This example also reveals another aspect of the image sign: its conventionality. Although the contents of an image are not arbitrary in the way in which the Saussurean sign is Saussure, 1960, they are still produced through a convention: they are cultural manifestations Eco, 197. Consider the images of Fig. 1.2. The image at the center is a Modigliani portrait and, placed in the context of other 20th century paintings (some of USER INTERFACE FOR EMERGENT SEMANTICS 5 Figure 1.2 A ....

Saussure, F. D. (1960). Cours de linguistique generale. Payot, Paris.

No context found.

Saussure, F. de (1916). Cours de Linguistique Generale. Paris, Payot.

No context found.

Saussure, F., \Cours de linguistique generale," Payot, Lausanne et Paris, 1995

No context found.

Saussure, F. de (1916) (Bally, C. and Sechehaye, A. eds.) Cours de Linguistique Generale. Paris: Bally and Sechehaye.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC