Lance Hoffman (ed), "Building in Big Brother: The Cryptographic Policy Debate", Springer-Verlag, 1995. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Secure Internet-based Electronic Commerce: The View from Outside.. - Gutmann (Correct)
....they could sell their products. Unfortunately encryption technology which was conducive to US government spying [Madsen 1994] Madsen 1995] Reuter 1995] was seen as undesirable by non US users, and unmarketable by US companies; the resulting debate has been documented in great detail elsewhere [Hoffman 1995] [Gutmann 1996c] Ironically, even when a security system was specifically designed to provide a backdoor for the US government, its export has not been allowed. Although backdoor access (and therefore exportability) was the primary design goal of the NSA s own Clipper Capstone Fortezza encryption ....
Lance Hoffman (ed), "Building in Big Brother: The Cryptographic Policy Debate", Springer-Verlag, 1995.
Government, Cryptography, and the Right To Privacy - Shearer, Gutmann (1996) (Correct)
....fear of US officials about encrypted computer crime may have limited justification. 4.1 The Clipper Chip By late 1995, the US Clipper Chip initiative was generally acknowledged to have failed. The reasons for this have been covered exhaustively elsewhere, with two very in depth discussions being [Hoffman 1995] and [Froomkin 1995] The major objection to Clipper was that the proposed key forfeiture system was seen to be the forerunner to universal surveillance. Because of concerns like this, 80 of 1000 people surveyed in a Time CNN poll were opposed to Clipper [Elmer Dewitt 1994] Anyone who wanted ....
Hoffman, L. "Building in Big Brother: The Cryptographic Policy Debate", Springer-Verlag, 1995.
Multi-Grade Cryptography - Rivest (1995) (2 citations) (Correct)
....cryptography Ronald L. Rivest Laboratory for Computer Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 email: rivest theory.lcs.mit.edu November 19, 1995 1 Introduction The recent development of powerful cryptographic techniques has caused a number of public policy issues to become significant. The three most prominent issues are (1) export control, 2) key escrow, and (3) anonymity. These ....
....cryptography Ronald L. Rivest Laboratory for Computer Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 email: rivest theory.lcs.mit.edu November 19, 1995 1 Introduction The recent development of powerful cryptographic techniques has caused a number of public policy issues to become significant. The three most prominent issues are (1) export control, 2) key escrow, and (3) anonymity. These represent tradeoffs between different societal ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Lance J. Hoffman, editor. Building in Big Brother: The Cryptographic Policy Debate. SpringerVerlag, 1995.
Translucent Cryptography - An Alternative to Key Escrow, and.. - Bellare, Rivest (1996) (1 citation) (Correct)
....[21] This position is highly unpopular with many (most ) citizens and with much of the business community. The purpose of this paper is not to contribute to the political debate directly. For the record, the views of the second author are strongly libertarian. The reader is referred to Hoffman [17], Denning [10] or Micali [20] for some discussion of the issues involved. Rather, our purpose here is contribute as technologists by pointing out that there are other possible ways we might try to achieve an appropriate balance between individual privacy and government access to communications. ....
Lance J. Hoffman, editor. Building in Big Brother: The Cryptographic Policy Debate. SpringerVerlag, 1995.
Translucent Cryptography - An Alternative to Key Escrow, and.. - Bellare, Rivest (1997) (1 citation) (Correct)
....[21] This position is highly unpopular with many (most ) citizens and with much of the business community. The purpose of this paper is not to contribute to the political debate directly. For the record, the views of the second author are strongly libertarian. The reader is referred to Hoffman [17], Denning [11] or Micali [20] for some discussion of the issues involved. Rather, our purpose here is contribute as technologists by pointing out that there are other possible ways we might try to achieve an appropriate balance between individual privacy and government access to communications. ....
L. Hoffman, editor. Building in Big Brother: The Cryptographic Policy Debate. SpringerVerlag, 1995.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC