S. Crane, N. Dulay, H. Fosså, J. Kramer, J. Magee , M. Sloman, K. Twidle ,, "Configuration Management for Distributed Systems", ICSTM.CM 1.1 V2.1, Department of Computing Research Report, 1994. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Regis: A Constructive Development Environment for.. - Magee, Dulay, Kramer (1994) (46 citations) Self-citation (Dulay Kramer Magee) (Correct)
....no transmission errors occur. The local communication times are dominated by the time taken to perform a light weight thread context switch on the SPARC architecture. Local Remote Message Size(bytes) Test Synchronous X.out(M) X.in(M) Asynchronous X.send(M) X. in(M) 1 100 1000 1 100 1000 118uS 126uS 197uS 1.89mS 2.05mS 3.01mS 121uS 131uS 182uS 0.98mS 1.16mS 2.17mS Table 1 Port communication performance In this section, we have illustrated how communication is supported in Regis by C objects. In particular, we have used the Regis port object as an example. Ports can be used to ....
....facility described above, Regis also provides a mechanism termed lazy instantiation. Component instances may be declared in the configuration program, however, they are not actually instantiated until another component tries to use one of the services they provide. For example, if in Figure 11 the command execution component instance had been declared as: inst C: dyn comexec; then the instance C would not be created until the command service it provides is requested by an external client. In this way, potential configurations can be expressed, however, the resources need not be ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
S. Crane, N. Dulay, H. Fosså, J. Kramer, J. Magee , M. Sloman, K. Twidle ,, "Configuration Management for Distributed Systems", ICSTM.CM 1.1 V2.1, Department of Computing Research Report, 1994.
Specifying Distributed Software Architectures - Magee, Dulay, Eisenbach, Kramer (1994) (172 citations) Self-citation (Dulay Kramer Magee) (Correct)
....is intended to be a general purpose notation for specifying the structure of systems composed from diverse components using diverse interaction mechanisms. It is currently being used in the context of the Regis system [10] which supports multiple interaction primitives and in the Sysman project [11] with Ansaware [12] which uses remote object invocation for component interaction. Darwin allows the specification of both static structures fixed during system initialisation and dynamic structures which evolve as execution progresses. An earlier version of Darwin was used in conjunction with the ....
....has a distributed and concurrent interpretation permitting the construction of large distributed systems in an efficient manner. In addition, it allows physical distribution to be specified completely orthogonally to logical structure. Darwin allows interaction with external management agents [11] which can direct structural changes in response to changing system requirements whether operational or evolutionary. The aim that Darwin be general purpose requires that there should be a clear and well specified division of responsibilities between Darwin and the primitive components it ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
S. Crane, N. Dulay, H. Fossa, J. Kramer, J. Magee, M. Sloman and K. Twidle, Configuration Management for Distributed Systems, to be presented at ISINM 95.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC