R.E. Bryant, "Division, Pentium style: An analysis of Intel's mistake(s)," CMU Computer Systems Seminar, February 22, 1995. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams and Minimal Trellises - Lafferty, Vardy (1998) (1 citation) (Correct)
....these extensions attempt to improve the compactness of representation [7, 28] while The importance and potential impact of these methods can be gauged by the highly publicized Intel Pentium floating point divider bug in 1994, which cost the company an estimated 475 million. It has been shown [17] that Intel could have used ordered binary decision diagrams to detect and correct the erroneous table entries in the Pentium floating point divider. others extend the class of functions that can be represented [20, 4, 23, 24, 27, 56] Finally, decision diagrams have been applied to a wider ....
R.E. Bryant, "Division, Pentium style: An analysis of Intel's mistake(s)," CMU Computer Systems Seminar, February 22, 1995.
Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams - And Minimal Trellises (Correct)
No context found.
R.E. Bryant, "Division, Pentium style: An analysis of Intel's mistake(s)," CMU Computer Systems Seminar, February 22, 1995.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC