Nehmer,J., Haban,D., Mattern,F., Wybranietz,D. and ROMBACH,D. (1987). "Key Concepts of the INCAS Multicomputer Project", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-13 (8).  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

.... authors with the Conic system [KRA85,MAG89] The advantages of separating structural description from individual process coding have also been advantages of separating structural description from individual process coding have also been recognised by a number of other systems[BAR88, LEB85, LEE86, NEH87, PUR88] The structuring language Darwin described here is a development of its predecessor, the The structuring language Darwin described here is a development of its predecessor, the Conic configuration language[DUL90] Darwin generalises Conic by being largely independent Conic configuration ....

Nehmer,J., Haban,D., Mattern,F., Wybranietz,D. and ROMBACH,D. (1987). "Key Concepts of the INCAS Multicomputer Project", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-13 (8).

.... Constructive Development Environment for Parallel and Distributed Programs Jeff Magee, Naranker Dulay, Jeff Kramer Department of Computing, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, 180 Queen s Gate, London SW7 2BZ, UK. Email: jnm uk.ac.ic.doc Tel: 44 71 589 5111 x5040 Fax: 44 71 581 5024 Abstract Regis is a programming environment aimed at supporting the development and execution of parallel and distributed programs. It embodies a constructive approach to the development of programs based on separating ....

....Development Environment for Parallel and Distributed Programs Jeff Magee, Naranker Dulay, Jeff Kramer Department of Computing, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, 180 Queen s Gate, London SW7 2BZ, UK. Email: jnm uk.ac. ic.doc Tel: 44 71 589 5111 x5040 Fax: 44 71 581 5024 Abstract Regis is a programming environment aimed at supporting the development and execution of parallel and distributed programs. It embodies a constructive approach to the development of programs based on separating program structure from communication and computation. The emphasis is on ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

J. Nehmer, D. Haban, F. Mattern, D. Wybranietz, D. Rombach, "Key Concepts of the INCAS Multicomputer Project", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-13 (8), August 1987.

....management agents. In contrast with its predecessors, CONIC and REX, Darwin has a distributed implementation which permits the concurrent elaboration of a system. It allows physical distribution to be specified completely orthogonally to logical structure. In common with a number of similar systems[6,7,8], REX and CONIC permitted distribution only at the top level of the system configuration description. The goal that Darwin be general purpose requires that there should be a clear and well specified division of responsibilities between Darwin and the primitive components it configures. The goal ....

J. Nehmer, D. Haban, F. Mattern, D. Wybranietz, D. Rombach, Key Concepts of the INCAS Multicomputer Project, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-13 (8), August 1987.

....(interior) reception of messages within a method, in that the newly added method definitions cannot be entirely accounted for. Therefore it would be difficult to incorporate inheritance into languages that allow interior message receptions. Examples of such languages are ABCL 1[42, 41] and CSSA[29]. There are also languages that extends existing sequential OO languages with explicit message reception statements in order to achieve inter object concurrency, such as Concurrent C [15] Buhr et al. s extension to C [10] or Tuple Space Smalltalk[22] For these languages, however, the ....

Jurgen Nehmer, Dieter Haban, Friedemann Mattern, Dieter Wybraniez, and H. Dieter Rombach. Key concepts of the INCAS multicomputer project. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 13(8):913--923, August 1987.

....(interior) reception of messages within a method, in that the newly added method definitions cannot be entirely accounted for. Therefore it would be difficult to incorporate inheritance into languages that allow interior message receptions. Examples of such languages are ABCL 1[128, 127] and CSSA[83]. There are also languages that extend existing sequential OO languages with explicit message reception statements in order to achieve inter object concurrency, such as Concurrent C [43] Buhr et al. s extension to C [19] or Tuple Space Smalltalk[68] For these languages, however, the messages ....

Jurgen Nehmer, Dieter Haban, Friedemann Mattern, Dieter Wybraniez, and H. Dieter Rombach. Key concepts of the INCAS multicomputer project. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 13(8):913--923, August 1987.

.... A Constructive Development Environment for Distributed Programs Jeff Magee, Naranker Dulay, Jeff Kramer Department of Computing, Imperial College, London SW7 2BZ, UK. Abstract Regis is a programming environment aimed at supporting the development and execution of distributed programs. It embodies a constructive approach to the development of programs based on separating program structure from communication and computation. The emphasis is on ....

....from system specification as a configuration of component specifications to implementation as a set of interacting computational components. Configuration programming thus separates the description of program structure from the programming of computational components. In common with others [2,3,4] we have found this to be crucial in managing the complexity of large parallel and distributed programs. The Regis environment extends our previous work in two major areas: by separating communication from computation and in the support for dynamic program structures. The Conic system[5] ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

J. Nehmer, D. Haban, F. Mattern, D. Wybranietz, D. Rombach, "Key Concepts of the INCAS Multicomputer Project", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-13 (8), August 1987.

....to an equivalent statechart. 11 ii 1 Introduction Large scale software systems, distributed or otherwise, can be complex to describe, construct, manage, understand, and maintain. Current research approaches to reducing this complexity separate software structural and behavioral descriptions [1, 11, 15, 16]. It is, therefore, important to study and analyze the behavioral as well as structural aspects of software systems. Much research has been done on software structures and their patterns, characterizations, and classifications [4, 5, 6] Special languages, called configuration languages, supported ....

J. Nehmer, D. Haban, F. Mattern, D. Wybraniertz, and D. Rombach. Key concepts of the INCAS multicomputer project. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE1-13(8):913--923, August 1987.

....years, the Conic environment [23] has supported the use of an explicit configuration language ( configuration programming ) for distributed system construction. A number of other research projects make use of a separate configuration language for distributed systems construction (Durra [3] Lady [27] Polylith [29] but few are as widely distributed and used, and as simple yet versatile as the Conic configuration language which includes facilities for hierarchic definition of composite components, for parametrisation of components, for replication of both component instances and interface ....

J.Nehmer, et al, "Key Concepts of the INCAS Multicomputer Project", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-13 (8), August 1987.

....line. 12 ii 1 Introduction Large scale real time distributed systems, can be complex to describe, construct, manage, understand, and maintain. Current research approaches to reducing this complexity separate software structural and behavioral descriptions [2, 11, 14, 15]. It is, therefore, important to identify and formally describe software behavioral views 1 and structural patterns; these patterns and or views, then, can be used in software systems analysis, specifications, design, and configurations. Much research has been done on software structures and ....

J. Nehmer, D. Haban, F. Mattern, D. Wybraniertz, and D. Rombach. Key concepts of the INCAS multicomputer project. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE1-13(8):913--923, August 1987.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC