R. J. Passonneau. 1997. Instructions for applying discourse reference annotation for multiple applications (DRAMA). Unpublished manuscript., December. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Understanding Referring Expressions - Byron (1998) (Correct)
..... the trade but it does include possessive pronouns [Hirschman et al..1998] The MUC 7 task defined separate categories of coreference for intensional vs. extensional coreference, to capture the difference between the two CEO s of XYZ corp. mentioned in Section 3. Borrowing from the DRI manual [Passonneau1996] the MUC manual[Corporation1997] and Passonneau s thesis work [Schiffman1985] I have developed the following set of features that will be annotated for all occurrences of it that in the selected TRAINS dialogs. Annotation is collected on an Excel spreadsheet in which each word in the dialog is ....
Rebecca J. Passonneau. 1996. Instructions for applying discourse reference annotation for multiple applications (drama) draft. Dagstuhl workshop notes.
Resolving Demonstrative Anaphora in the TRAINS93 Corpus - Byron, Allen (Correct)
....to see if any pragmatic distinction exists between using it vs. that to refer to the time, but all other expletive pronouns were not markable in this exercise. 4.1. 2 Annotation scheme The annotation scheme used in this study was developed after reviewing the DRI coreference annotation manual [Pas96], the MUC coreference task definition [MUC7] and Passonneau s thesis work [Sch85] and borrows heavily on the ideas in those schemes. In addition to indexical identifying information for each utterance (such as the dialog and utterance numbers) the following features were annotated for each ....
Rebecca J. Passonneau. Instructions for applying discourse reference annotation for multiple applications (DRAMA) manual (draft). Dagstuhl workshop notes. 1996.
Coding Discourse Structure in Dialogue (Version 1.0) - Christine Nakatani (Correct)
....IU codings reflect the intentional or informational structure of dialogue. This two level scheme is a natural complement to schemes intended to cover other aspects of dialogue, especially micro level schemes developed for dialogue acts (e.g. Allen and Core, Draft 1997] or co reference (e.g. [Passonneau, 1997]) The coding scheme presented here is more a first attempt than a comprehensive product. We expect further development in several directions. First, there may be additional coding schemes along other dimensions to address other dialogue phenomena (e.g. initiative) the current scheme considers ....
R. Passonneau. Instructions for applying discourse reference annotation for multiple applications (DRAMA). Unpublished manuscript., December 1997.
The Reliability of Anaphoric Annotation, Reconsidered.. - Poesio, Artstein (2005) (Correct)
No context found.
R. J. Passonneau. 1997. Instructions for applying discourse reference annotation for multiple applications (DRAMA). Unpublished manuscript., December.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC