| Richard P. Gabriel. The end of history and the last programming language. Journal of Object Oriented Programming, 20(7), July 2002. |
....procedural interpretation to the resulting code. Other representations such as declarative or object oriented have found a better fit. 4. The Status of Prolog how successful is it The success of a programming language may be measured with reference to a number of different criteria. Gabriel [13] proposed a set of criteria for a general purpose language which included its social acceptability (meaning its local support, similarity to existing languages and benefits in moving to it) amount of resources it required, its performance model and level of aptitude required to use it. The weight ....
....As a mainstream general application language, it can at least hope not to provide the reasons for rewriting after the prototype has been developed by providing the necessary speed, robustness and integration. However, the choice of a language is often a social phenomenon rather than technical [13] and the perceived image of Prolog is frequently still of its state twenty years ago when it first emerged. It is perhaps also important to try to extract Prolog s main features and use these to augment existing popular languages. In this way, the existing programmer base is more likely to make ....
R. P. Gabriel, The End of History and the Last Programming Language, Journal of Object Oriented Programming, 6 (4) 90 - 94 (1993). 34
No context found.
Richard P. Gabriel. The end of history and the last programming language. Journal of Object Oriented Programming, 20(7), July 2002.
No context found.
Gabriel, R.P. The end of history and the last programming language. JOOP 6, JulyAugust (1993), pp. 90-94.
No context found.
Gabriel, R.P. The end of history and the last programming language. JOOP , July-August (1993), 90-94.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC