| A. Kock. Strong functors and monoidal monads. Various Publications Series 11, Aarhus Universitet, August 1970. |
....strength t has to be given as an extra parameter for models. However, t is uniquely determined (but it may not exists) by T and the cartesian structure on C, when C has enough points, i.e. if f; g: A B, then f = g (8h: 1 A:h; f = h; g) The diagrams above are not new, they are all in [Koc70b], where a one one correspondence is established between functorial and tensorial strengths 6 : ffl the first two diagrams, saying that t is a tensorial strength of T , are (1.7) and (1.8) in [Koc70b] By Theorem 1.3 in [Koc70b] t induces a functorial strength of T making T a C enriched (also ....
....A B, then f = g (8h: 1 A:h; f = h; g) The diagrams above are not new, they are all in [Koc70b] where a one one correspondence is established between functorial and tensorial strengths 6 : ffl the first two diagrams, saying that t is a tensorial strength of T , are (1.7) and (1. 8) in [Koc70b]. By Theorem 1.3 in [Koc70b] t induces a functorial strength of T making T a C enriched (also called strong) functor. ffl the last two diagrams say that j and are natural transformations between suitable C enriched functors, namely j: Id C : T and : T 2 : T (see Remark 1.5 in [Koc70b] ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
A. Kock. Strong functors and monoidal monads. Various Publications Series 11, Aarhus Universitet, August 1970.
....strength t has to be given as an extra parameter for models. However, t is uniquely determined (but it may not exists) by T and the cartesian structure on C, when C has enough points, i.e. if f; g: A B, then f = g (8h: 1 A:h; f = h; g) The diagrams above are not new, they are all in [Koc70b], where a one one correspondence is established between functorial and tensorial strengths 6 : the rst two diagrams, saying that t is a tensorial strength of T , are (1.7) and (1.8) in [Koc70b] By Theorem 1.3 in [Koc70b] t induces a functorial strength of T making T a C enriched (also ....
....g: A B, then f = g (8h: 1 A:h; f = h; g) The diagrams above are not new, they are all in [Koc70b] where a one one correspondence is established between functorial and tensorial strengths 6 : the rst two diagrams, saying that t is a tensorial strength of T , are (1.7) and (1. 8) in [Koc70b]. By Theorem 1.3 in [Koc70b] t induces a functorial strength of T making T a C enriched (also called strong) functor. the last two diagrams say that and are natural transformations between suitable C enriched functors, namely : Id C : T and : T 2 : T (see Remark 1.5 in [Koc70b] ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
A. Kock. Strong functors and monoidal monads. Various Publications Series 11, Aarhus Universitet, August 1970.
....work, a monad (T; j; satisfies the mono requirement if each component of j is a monomorphism. A tensorial strength for a monad T on a symmetric monoidal category is a natural transformation with components A;B : A Omega TB T (A Omega B) subject to the coherence conditions as found in [Koc70,Mog88,Mog91]. It is commutative if the evident two natural transformations from TA Omega TB to T (A Omega B) agree. Definition 37. A c model is a cartesian category C with a strong monad (T; j; which satisfies the mono requirement and has Kleisli exponents: that is, for each object A, the functor J ....
A. Kock, Strong functors and monoidal monads. Various Publications Series 11, Aarhus Universitet, 1970.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC