| Arita, T., & Taylor, C. E. (1996). A simple model for the evolution of communication. In L. J. Fogel, P. J. Angeline, & T. B ack (Eds.), Evolutionary programming V (Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming (pp. 405--409). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. |
....approach in order to address the problem of how to attach the meaning to a word, e.g. how can one agent s perception and description of the world make sense for another agent that is physically different. Examples of related work on agent communication and social behaviour are [12] 15] 14] [1] and [13] 17] Our 2 approach is different since it combines the following aspects. 1) The learning of the language is not implicit in the mechanisms and the learning architecture which we use. 2) Communication is not treated as a specialised module inside the control architecture of the ....
T. Arita and C. E. Taylor, (1996), `A simple model for the evolution of communication', UCLA Commotion Lab Tech Report 013, UCLA, US.
....to a common definition of the vocabulary, while this definition would have been different from that initially taught by the teacher robot. The observation of a shift in the meaning of the words of the vocabulary for the agent is similar to the emergence of a dialect as in the studies of [1, 51] in their simulations of the development of language. We did not make this analysis mainly because the aim of our experiment was to study correct transmission of a fixed pre defined vocabulary (and also because these simulations were extremely long to run) as opposed to [1, 51] who studied the ....
....in the studies of [1, 51] in their simulations of the development of language. We did not make this analysis mainly because the aim of our experiment was to study correct transmission of a fixed pre defined vocabulary (and also because these simulations were extremely long to run) as opposed to [1, 51] who studied the emergence and variation of a lexicon as an effect of its transmission. It would of course be very interesting to carry out similar studies in the future, using the physical simulation and the DRAMA architecture. In particular, it would be valuable to compare our results with ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Arita T. & Taylor C. E., (1996), `A Simple Model for the Evolution of Communication', The Fifth Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming, 1996.
.... For instance, two robots can agree on a common name for a location, while one recognises it by the exact position (angle and distance measurements) and the other one by its shape (camera observation) Examples of related work on agent communication and social behaviour are [12] 15] 14] [1] and [13] Our approach is different since it combines the following aspects. 1) We worked with embodied agents, robots, not only in order to validate simulation results but as the starting point for our study. 2) We used a physically structured, meaningful environment, a hilly landscape. The ....
T. Arita and C. E. Taylor, (1996), `A simple model for the evolution of communication', UCLA Commotion Lab Tech Report 013, UCLA, US.
No context found.
Arita, T., & Taylor, C. E. (1996). A simple model for the evolution of communication. In L. J. Fogel, P. J. Angeline, & T. B ack (Eds.), Evolutionary programming V (Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming (pp. 405--409). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
No context found.
Arita, T. and Taylor C. E.: A simple model for the evolution of communication. Evolutionary Programming V, MIT Press (1996)
No context found.
T. Arita and C. E. Taylor, (1996), `A simple model for the evolution of communication', UCLA Commotion Lab Tech Report 013, UCLA, US.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC