D.B. Skalak and E.L. Rissland. Arguments and cases: an inevitable intertwining. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1:3--44, 1992. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
On the Theory of Argumentation Frameworks - Jakobovits (2000) (3 citations) (Correct)
....models of defeasible argumentation and computation of status of claims and arguments. In addition, models of legal argumentation have been provided for use in AI and Law, in works such as [BC98] Lou98] SSK 86] and [HLL94] Some models of legal argumentation, such as [Gor95] AR88] and [SR92] have been implemented to process actual legal cases, while decision making models such as those presented in [BG94] GK96] Ree98] and [PJ98] have been implemented to deal with mediation processes. Recently, many researchers adopt a procedural approach to argumentation, in which a claim is ....
D. B. Skalak and E. L. Rissland. Arguments and cases: an inevitable intertwining. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1:3--44, 1992.
Dialectic Semantics for Argumentation Frameworks - Jakobovits, Vermeir (1999) (13 citations) (Correct)
....argumentation has been modeled, for example, in [McC97] BC98] SSK 86] and [HLL94] Furthermore, a formalization and computational model of civil pleading such as The Pleadings Game ( Gor95] has been implemented and tested using legal examples. Systems such as HYPO ( AR88] and CABARET ( SR92] have been implemented to process legal cases by integrating rules and reasoning with previous cases. In this paper we model argumentation between two participants, i.e. dialogue. A dialogue is initiated by a proponent who proposes a thesis, which she then attempts to defend against any attacks ....
D. B. Skalak and E. L. Rissland. Arguments and cases: an inevitable intertwining. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1:3--44, 1992.
Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational Issues, Methodological.. - Aamodt, Plaza (1994) (35 citations) (Correct)
....reasoning in legal judgements [52] Cases (precedents) are here not used to produce a single answer, but to interpret a situation in court, and to produce and assess arguments for both parties. This resulted in the HYPO system [10] and later the combined case based and rule based system CABARET [60]. Phyllis Koton at MIT studied the use of case based reasoning to optimize performance in an existing knowledge based system, where the domain (heart failure) was described by a deep, causal model. This resulted in the CASEY system [38] in which casebased and deep model based reasoning was ....
Skalak, C.B, and Rissland, E. (1992): Arguments and cases: An inevitable twining. Artificial Intelligence and Law, An International Journal, 1(1), pp.3-48.
Reasoning with Precedents in a Dialogue Game - Prakken, Sartor (1997) (Correct)
....structured ways of introducing information into a dispute. For instance, we could allow for other forms of analogical reasoning, such as those based on abstraction. And it would be interesting to see if later research on case based reasoning and its integration with rule based reasoning (e.g. [Skalak Rissland, 1992], Aleven Ashley, 1996] can be defined in our dialogue game as heuristics for playing the game. ....
D.B. Skalak & E.L. Rissland, Arguments and Cases. An Inevitable Intertwining. Artificial Intelligence and Law 1: 3--44.
Human Reasoning and Cognitive Science - Stenning, van Lambalgen (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
D.B. Skalak and E.L. Rissland. Arguments and cases: an inevitable intertwining. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1:3--44, 1992.
A Simple Scheme to Structure and Process the Information of.. - Vreeswijk (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
David B. Skalak and Edwina L. Rissland. Arguments and cases: An inevitable intertwining. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1:3--44, 1992.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC