Hadley, R. F. (1994). Systematicity in connectionist language learning. Mind and Language, 9 (3), 247--272. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Generalization By Structural Properties From Sparse Nested.. - Bodén (Correct)
....the statistical learner would not generalize to process a x 1 b x 1 , or any n beyond x. Natural language contains many examples where embedding occurs. The inability to extrapolate beyond data led some to argue that a mechanism based on structure sensitivity (and recursion) is required [5]. Natural language also make use of a large number of components and, thus, a learner must abstract. We extend a n b n by having two as, and two bs (a grammar which we refer to as a diversified center embedded language, DCEL) The statistically driven n gram learner now needs to store 25 2 ....
....training set. In Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) networks and some Simple Recurrent Networks (SRNs; 3] simple linear counters are induced [4] for a n b n . In some SRNs and Sequential Cascaded Networks (SCNs; 8] oscillating or spiralling dynamics is induced [1] As pointed out by Hadley [5] and Marcus [6] generalization in humans sometimes goes beyond the regularities inferred with recurrent networks. As an example, if you 1 Don t care markers can reduce this number. have heard Smith fleedled Jones you would infer that it is grammatical to say Smith fleedled Belanger (even ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
R. F. Hadley. Systematicity in connectionist language learning. Mind and Language, 9(3):247--272, 1994.
Generalization By Structural Properties From Sparse Nested.. - Bodén (Correct)
....the statistical learner would not generalize to process a x 1 b x 1 , or any n beyond x. Natural language contains many examples were embedding occurs. The inability to extrapolate beyond data led some to argue that a mechanism based on structure sensitivity (and recursion) is required [5]. Natural language also make use of a large number of components and, thus, a learner must abstract. We extend a n b n by having two as, and two bs (a grammar which we refer to as a diversified center embedded language, DCEL) The statistically driven n gram learner now needs to store 25 2 ....
....training set. In Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) networks and some Simple Recurrent Networks (SRNs; 3] simple linear counters are induced [4] for a n b n . In some SRNs and Sequential Cascaded Networks (SCNs; 8] oscillating or spiralling dynamics is induced [1] As pointed out by Hadley [5] and Marcus [6] generalization in humans sometime goes beyond the regularities inferred with recurrent networks. As an example, if you 1 Don t care markers can reduce this number. have heard Smith fleedled Jones you would infer that it is grammatical to say Smith fleedled Belanger (even ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
R. F. Hadley. Systematicity in connectionist language learning. Mind and Language, 9(3):247--272, 1994.
Is There a Mind Gene? - Narayanan (Correct)
.... may well survive longer than its siblings which do not have the mutation, and the descendants of that organism will inherit an aspect of their ancestor s improved mentalism (Figure 5) The way that neural networks are related to mentalism is a hot topic in cognitive science (see, for instance, Hadley (1994), Niklasson and van Gelder (1994) Butler (1995) Narayanan and Bod en (1996) Proposals include denoting the weight vectors between layers of units in a trained network as representations, using hyperplane analysis on these weight vectors to extract hidden representations to reflect contextual ....
Hadley, R. F. (1994). Systematicity in connectionist language learning. Mind and Language, 9, 247--272.
Can Connectionist Models Exhibit Non-Classical Structure.. - Niklasson, al. (1994) (9 citations) (Correct)
....hence can be the basis for structure sensitive operations, but are not constructed by strict concatenation, which is the hallmark of classical approaches. The model presented in this paper was constructed in accordance with this tradition. In recent and lucid contributions to this debate Robert Hadley (1992, 1993) introduced a learning based form of systematicity, and argued that a number of levels of systematicity, from weak to strong, ought to be distinguished, and that, while humans at least exhibit (what he defined as) strong systematicity, careful analysis shows that connectionist models have achieved ....
Hadley R. F., (1993), Systematicity in Connectionist Language Learning, Tech. Report, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., V5A 1S6, Canada.
Are feedforward and recurrent networks systematic? Analysis and.. - Phillips (1998) (3 citations) (Correct)
....in other connectionist systems designed to incorporate systematicity. If learning is to be the additional connectionist property that enforces systematic behaviour, then a suitable criterion for systematicity as generalization must be specified. For the rest of the paper, criteria devised by Hadley (1993, 1994) are considered as the requirement for systematicity. There are difficulties with treating systematicity as a generalization problem. It is difficult to determine exactly what level of generalization is achieved by humans. This uncertainty is exaggerated by lack of control over a subject s ....
....for this assumption in the Discussion section. An example of strong systematicity would be to correctly infer that John is the lover of Mary , given the premise John loves Mary , having only been trained on examples where John appeared in the object position of the binary relation loves . Hadley (1993, 1994) found that the models of McClelland and Kawamoto (1986) Chalmers (1990) Elman (1989, 1990, 1991) Smolensky (1990) and St. John and McClelland (1990) did not demonstrate strong systematicity. Essentially, by a statistical analysis of training sets, in all likelihood all components appeared in ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Hadley, R. F. (1994). Systematicity in connectionist language learning. Mind and Language, 9 (3), 247--272.
Strong Systematicity within Connectionism: The Tensor-Recurrent.. - Phillips (1994) (6 citations) (Correct)
....models that generalize over structured domains. For example, Elman s (1990) simple recurrent network and Pollack s (1990) recursive auto associative memory correctly process sentences not present in the training set. The question is, does this degree of generalization constitute systematicity Hadley (1994) concludes No. His conclusion was based on a closer examination of six models, which included: McClelland and Kawamoto (1986) Chalmers (1990) Elman (1990) Pollack (1990) Smolensky (1990) and St. John and McClelland (1990) All six models failed to provide clear demonstrations of what Hadley ....
....position) 1 , for two reasons. Either, the training sets in all probability contained words in all positions; or, representations of words were such that the model presupposes knowledge of syntactic categories, which begs the question of where did this knowledge come from in the first place. See (Hadley, 1994) for more detailed arguments. This second point can also be made with regard to the work of Niklasson (1993) Although in each case, with the exception of Niklasson, the modelers were not attempting to demonstrate strong systematicity, the result suggests a common limitation of these models. ....
Hadley, R. F. (1994). Systematicity in connectionist language learning. Mind and Language. To appear.
Connectionism and the Problem of Systematicity - Phillips (1995) (Correct)
No context found.
Hadley, R. F. (1994). Systematicity in connectionist language learning. Mind and Language, 9 (3), 247--272.
Generalization by Symbolic Abstraction in Cascaded Recurrent.. - Boden (Correct)
No context found.
Robert F. Hadley. Systematicity in connectionist language learning. Mind and Language, 9(3):247--272, 1994.
Generalisation Power of Connectionist Models Using Temporal.. - Rotaru-Varga (1999) (Correct)
No context found.
Hadley, Robert F. Systematicity in Connectionist Language Learning. In Mind and Language, vol.
Pierrehumbert, Janet and Hirschberg, Julia, 1990. "The.. - Intentions In.. (Correct)
No context found.
Hadley, Robert, 1994a. "Systematicity in Connectionist Language Learning." Mind and Language 9:247-- 272.
Systematicity: Psychological evidence with connectionist.. - Phillips, Halford (1997) (2 citations) (Correct)
No context found.
Cognition, 28, 3--71. Hadley, R. F. (1994). Systematicity in connectionist language learning. Mind and Language, 9 (3), 247-- 272.
Semantic Systematicity and Context in Connectionist Networks - Bodén, Niklasson (1999) (Correct)
No context found.
Hadley, R. F. (1994a). Systematicity in connectionist language learning. Mind and Language, 9(3):247-272.
Content, Context and Connectionist Networks - Niklasson, al. (1999) (Correct)
No context found.
Hadley, R. F., (1994a), Systematicity in Connectionist Language Learning, Mind and Language, vol. 9, no. 3.
Semantic Systematicity and Context in Connectionist Networks - Bodén, Niklasson (Correct)
No context found.
Hadley, R. F. (1994a). Systematicity in connectionist language learning. Mind and Language, 9(3):247--272.
Connectionist Sentence Processing in Perspective - Steedman (1998) (2 citations) (Correct)
No context found.
Hadley, Robert, 1994a. "Systematicity in Connectionist Language Learning." Mind and Language 9:247--272.
Toward a Connectionist Model of Recursion in Human.. - Christiansen, Chater (1999) (25 citations) (Correct)
No context found.
Hadley, R.F. (1994a). Systematicity in connectionist language learning. Mind and Language, 9, 247--272.
Semantic Systematicity and Context in Connectionist Networks - Bodén, Niklasson (1998) (Correct)
No context found.
Hadley, R. F. (1994a). Systematicity in connectionist language learning. Mind and Language, 9(3).
The Properties of Higher Cognitive Processes and How They Can .. - Wilson, Halford (Correct)
No context found.
Cognition, 28, 3-71. Hadley, R. F. (1994). Systematicity in connectionist language learning. Mind and Language, 9(3), 247-272.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC