Fodor, J. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....and more traditional AI paradigms. 2 Connectionist and Heuristic Search Models For most of its history, the heuristic search, logic, and physical symbol system [19] paradigms have doxninated AI. AI was conceived at about the same time that protocol analysis was in vogue in psychology [16t; such protocols could be implemented on the then new yon Neumann machines fairly well. Protocol analysis suggested that people operate by trial and error, using word like objects as primitive units. AI has stuck almost exclusively with heuristic search and symbol systems, using them in a wide ....

....data and heuristic search models; garden path sentences were an exception, where backtracking seems an appropria te model. Even there, it seems that to understand garden path sentences, people generally back up and completely reprocess sentences, using a trace stored in a sort of audio buffer [26] 58 Connectionist systems have stirred a great deal of excitement for a number of reasons: 1) They re novel. Connectionism seems to be a good candidate for a major new paradigm in a field where there have only been a handful of paradigms (heuristic search; constraint propagation; blackboard ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

Fodor, J. The Modularity of Mind, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1982.

....of this chapter presents an improvement to three layer architectures, called Behavior Oriented Design. 2. 1 Behavior Based Artificial Intelligence (BBAI) BBAI was first developed by Brooks [6] at a time when there were several prominent modular theories of natural intelligence being discussed [13, 17, 29]. In BBAI, intelligence is composed of a large number of modular elements that are relatively simple to design. Each element operates only in a particular context, which the module itself recognizes. In Brooks original proposal, these modules are finite state machines organized into interacting ....

Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Bradford Books. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

....a behavior based agent. 3 A Brief History of Modular AI This is a brief history of the critical attributes of BBAI systems I outlined above. More extensive reviews of the BBAI literature are also available [6, 8] 3. 1 Modules for Perception I will begin with Fodor s The Modularity of Mind [23], both because it introduces many of the concepts familiar to BBAI, and because it presents a theory of intelligence decomposition which is still actively researched in the natural sciences today [e.g. 18, 22, 41] Fodor introduces the terms horizontal vs. vertical to describe two ....

Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Bradford Books. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

....a couple w, f composed of a syntactically correct sentence w together with its (or one of its) semantics f. It can be noticed that this framework assumes that sensorial stimuli coming from a scene are coded into a semantic representation before entering the learning module (in the sense of [Fodor 83] where it will be compared with the sentence describing the same scene : in this sense, semantic learning precedes syntactic learning. The way this semantic learning occurs is not our concern here but it is supposed that the underlying set G, g i 1im , K, H is Fully Compositional. The ....

: J. Fodor, The Modularity of Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1983.

....is a nontrivial ability to have emerged. Recall, for example, 31] discusses a hypothesis that the origin of human consciousness is in the integration of the hemispheres, the end of interhemisphere intraindividual discrete communication; also recall the arguments on the modularity hypothesis [32] and Chomsky s minimalism that the role of language is not so much interpersonal communication as interfacing to the rest of cognitive architecture. a real model of information state beyond the immediate event. A richer extension of the system would include participant indexed knowledge bases and ....

Jerry A. Fodor, The Modularity of Mind, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1983.

....more detail. The remainder of this paper presents an improvement to three layer architectures, called Behavior Oriented Design. 2. 1 Behavior Based Artificial Intelligence (BBAI) BBAI was first developed by Brooks [5] at a time when there were several prominent modular theories of intelligence [12, 17, 28]. In BBAI, intelligence is composed of a large number of modular elements that are relatively simple to design. Each element operates only in a particular context, which it itself recognizes. In Brooks original proposal, these modules are finite state machines organized into interacting layers, ....

Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Bradford Books. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

....but on behavior in more narrowly defined ecological domains (p. 310) In this instance, we concur and set forth the hypothesis that the characterization of natural selection as a tinkerer (e.g. 18] provides strong reasons to believe in some version of information processing modularity [19] in the evolution of complex systems. However, this conception of independent mechanisms should not be confused with the purposive agenda of decomposing visual problems into continually simpler tasks. Bequeathing modularity upon a particular subsystem in no way entails that it is in any way ....

....of decomposing visual problems into continually simpler tasks. Bequeathing modularity upon a particular subsystem in no way entails that it is in any way purposive, but rather that it may be generally characterized as modality specific, innately specified, hard wired, autonomous, and not assembled [19]. Note that all of these properties are orthogonal to the information processing goal of the module. Computational objectives need to be specified independently and may take almost any form, including the recovery of scene attributes or the purposeful execution of a specific visual task. Recent ....

J. A. Fodor, Modularity of Mind, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1983.

....viewpoint of the labelling theory the acquisition of concepts occurs independently off and prior to language acquisition [Harnad, 1990] So there is no causal role of language. Conceptualisation and verbalisation are viewed as operating in independent modules which have no influence on each other [Fodor, 1983]. The acquisition of language is seen as a problem of learning labels for already existing concepts. Concerning then 3 the issue how the concepts themselves are acquired, two opposing schools are found: nativism and empiricism. Nativists like Fodor [Fodor, 1999] claim that concepts, particularly ....

Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge,

....the study of WS has recently received is the syndrome s rather unusual profile of general cognitive deficits and learning difficulties paired with relative strength in language. This pattern provides a potential source of evidence on the controversial issue of the modularity of mind and language (Fodor 1983). With an incidence estimated at between 1 in 20,000 and 1 in 50,000, WS is a relatively rare disorder (Greenberg 1990) In genetic terms, WS is an autosomal dominant disorder with most cases representing a new genetic mutation, resulting from a microdeletion within one elastin gene and its ....

Fodor, J., 1983. The modularity of mind. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.

.... No, structure is both inside (e.g. a plan) and outside (e.g. instructions) Does all the structure of behavior originate from the inside Or does some of it require a social interaction to initiate creation One could argue that the structural elements of language (Chomsky, 1980) and thought (Fodor, 1983) are rooted in the biological. One could also argue over whether external structure at one point or another has an internal form (see Cognitive Science, 1993) But both of these are beside the point. The issue here pivots over whether there exists structure for behavior whose creation depends on a ....

Fodor, J. (1983). The Modularity of the Mind. MIT Press.

No context found.

Fodor, J. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

No context found.

J. Fodor, The modularity of mind, MIT Press, 1983.

No context found.

Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

No context found.

Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

No context found.

Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Bradford Books. Garrod, S., & Doherty, G. (1994). Conversation, co-ordination and convention: An empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions. Cognition, 53, 181--215.

No context found.

Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.

No context found.

Fodor , J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

No context found.

Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

No context found.

Fodor, J. (1983), Modularity of Mind, MIT Press.

No context found.

J. A. Fodor. The Modularity of Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1983.

No context found.

J.A. Fodor. The Modularity of Mind. Bradford Books, MIT Press, 1983.

No context found.

J. Fodor, The modularity of mind, MIT Press, 1983.

No context found.

Fodor J. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge MA: MIT Press/A Bradford Book.

No context found.

Fodor, J.A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

No context found.

-- Fodor, J. A., The Modularity of Mind, MIT Press, 1983.

First 50 documents  Next 50

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC