| Prawitz, D. (1965). Natural Deduction. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm. |
.... nets by linear hypothetical judgments has a long history, going back to Mart Oliet and Meseguer [MOM91] Monadic encapsulation in the context of functional programming and type theory begins with Moggi s monadic metalanguage [Mog89, Mog91] Prawitz describes a proof theory for modal logics [Pra65], from which Moggi s presentation of the monadic metalanguage inherits. Pfenning and Davies [PD01] revisit the question of proof theory for modal logic, reinterpreting it on the basis of a judgmental approach in the style promulgated by MartinL of [ML96] Their approach improves on the original ....
Dag Prawitz. Natural Deduction. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 1965.
.... in which he could use familiar tools for the proof of consistency: the form of Curry s theory of functionality (his name for type assignment) which he considered a part of illative combinatory logic, and the proof theoretic tools of Gentzen [7] especially as developed by Curry [8,9] and Prawitz [10]. Seldin also wanted to allow for the possibility of assumptions other than those assigning types to variables; he thought that such assumptions might be useful, for example in dealing with the possibility of subtyping, which Curry had postulated by taking the assumption I : # # or #x . x : ....
....conversions of types, in the form of the abstraction rule, and whether assumptions are sequences and can only be introduced by rules, or are sets and can be arbitrary. Both kinds are natural deduction systems; the latter are more like those that have appeared in the work of Gentzen [7] and Prawitz [10]. Which of these versions one wants will depend on one s purpose. If one has a purpose for which typechecking is important, one will probably prefer one of the P or A versions below with sequences for assumptions, whereas if one wants to obtain consistency proofs or obtain other proof theoretic ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
D. Prawitz, Natural Deduction, Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm, Goteborg, and Uppsala, 1965.
No context found.
Dag Prawitz. Natural Deduction. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 1965.
No context found.
Prawitz, D. (1965). Natural Deduction. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm.
No context found.
Dag Prawitz. Natural Deduction. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 1965.
No context found.
Prawitz, D. 1965. Natural Deduction. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm.
No context found.
Dag Prawitz. Natural Deduction. Almqvist & Wiksell, Uppsala, 1965. 12
No context found.
Prawitz, D. (1965). Natural Deduction. Almquist and Wiksell, Uppsala.
No context found.
Prawitz, D. (1965). Natural Deduction, a proof-theoretical study. Almqvist & Wiksell.
No context found.
Dag Prawitz. Natural Deduction. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 1965.
No context found.
Dag Prawitz. Natural Deduction. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 1965.
No context found.
Dag Prawitz. Natural Deduction. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 1965.
No context found.
Dag Prawitz. Natural Deduction. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 1965.
No context found.
Dag Prawitz. Natural Deduction. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 1965.
No context found.
Dag Prawitz. Natural Deduction. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 1965.
No context found.
Dag Prawitz. Natural Deduction. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 1965.
No context found.
D. Prawitz. Natural Deduction. Almqvist & Wiksell, 1965.
No context found.
Dag Prawitz. Natural Deduction. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 1965.
No context found.
D. Prawitz. Natural Deduction. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 1965.
No context found.
Dag Prawitz. Natural Deduction. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 1965.
No context found.
Dag Prawitz. Natural Deduction. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm, Goteborg, and Uppsala, 1965.
No context found.
Dag Prawitz. Natural Deduction. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 1965.
No context found.
Prawitz D. Natural Deduction. Almqvist & Wiksell, 1965.
No context found.
Dag Prawitz. Natural Deduction. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm, Goteborg, and Uppsala, 1965. 11
No context found.
Dag Prawitz. Natural Deduction. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm, 1965.
First 50 documents Next 50
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC