Kanger, S., On realization of human rights, in: G. Holstrom and A. Jones (editors), Action, Logic, and Social Choice Theory - Acta Philosophica Fennica 38, Philosophical Society of Finland, Helsinki, pp. 71-78, 1985.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....A social commitment can not imply a juridicial norm, but utmost a directed norm (which we will use) S Comm(i; j; O j i ( 4) The directed obligation O j i ( is read as agent i (the addressee) has an obligation towards j (the counterparty) that will be achieved. Several authors ([9, 12, 15]) analysed or described the types of rights relationships between the addressees (or bearers) and counterparties from the classic work by Hohfeld ( 11] The counterparty is an agent or a group of agents that has a right against the addressee, who has a duty (an obligation) Right and duty ....

Kanger, S., On realization of human rights, in: G. Holstrom and A. Jones (editors), Action, Logic, and Social Choice Theory - Acta Philosophica Fennica 38, Philosophical Society of Finland, Helsinki, pp. 71-78, 1985.

.... then we can express the responsibility of all the agents to fulfill the collective obligation precisely: OX (p) C COMMX;fi ( ff 1 ; ff 2 ; ff 3 ) COMM(i 1 ; X; ff 1 ) COMM(i 2 ; X; ff 2 ) COMM(i 3 ; X; ff 3 ) O(i 1 : ff 1 ) ff 1 ]O(i 2 : ff 2 ) ff 1 ]O(i 3 : ff 3 ) Several authors ([8, 11, 12, 14, 15]) analysed or described the types of rights relationships between the addressees (or bearers) and counterparties from the classic work by Hohfeld ( 10] The counterparty is an agent or a group of agents that has a right against the addressee, who has a duty (an obligation) Right and duty ....

Kanger, S., On realization of human rights, in: G. Holstrom and A. Jones (editors), Action, Logic, and Social Choice Theory - Acta Philosophica Fennica 38, Philosophical Society of Finland, Helsinki, pp. 71-78.

....[privilege] and Claim [right] do appear indifferent. Hohfeld did not have access to the methods available to modern logicians, and even though highly acclaimed for his analytic talents (cf. 4] he does not offer a logical tool applicable for studying rights. Stig Kanger (see [15] 19] 17] [18]) was probably the first to give a formal account of Hohfeld s theory. One of Kanger s ideas was that the obligation operator of a deontic logic, together with an action operator, would enable the expression of all of Hohfeld s fundamental legal concepts. In [15] Kanger gives the following ....

Stig Kanger. On realization of human rights. In G. Holmstrom and A.J.I. Jones, editors, Action, Logic, and Social Theory, pages 71--78. Acta Philosophica Fennica, 38, Helsinki, 1985.

....original reference to that tradition is (Hohfeld, 1919) Morse also gives a summary in his tribute to Hohfeld (1995a) Kanger was among the first to formalize Hohfeld s ideas (1971) However, his development didn t do justice to the directedness of the original concepts. This is more obvious from (Kanger, 1985), and has been pointed out by several others, including most recently Herrestad Krogh (1995) We have some additional objections to Kanger s approach (1971) He defines ought and its dual right , roughly analogous to obligatory and permissible, and uses these to formalize Hohfeld s primitives. ....

Kanger, Stig; 1985. On realization of human rights. In (Holmstrom & Jones, 1985). 71--78.

....of deontic logic and the logic of action agency to the formalisation of what Hohfeld (1913) called the fundamental legal conceptions : duty, right, and other complex normative concepts. The basic methods are presented in (Kanger, 1957, Kanger and Kanger, 1966) with further discussion in (Kanger, 1985). There is a more general account of related issues in (Kanger, 1972) Lindahl (1977) develops Kanger s account in several important respects, providing also a commentary on the relationships to Hohfeld s work and the jurisprudential tradition within which it falls. P orn (1977) applied similar ....

Kanger, S. (1985). On realization of human rights. In Holmstrom, G. & Jones, A.J.I. (eds.) Action, Logic and Social Theory. Acta Philosophica Fennica, Vol. 38.

....that physician become the primary physician. this might be taken to require of the doctors and hospital administrators not merely that they permit the patient to get his record transferred (etc. but that they also make it possible for the patient to do just that. cf. the discussion in [Kan85] of what he called the realisation of rights. The issue here may be said to concern another kind of inter agent control, or influence. Whereas above we considered interaction structures of the type E a E b p, for instance, expressing the idea that a brings it about that b brings it about that ....

S. Kanger. On Realization of Human Rights. In G. Holmstrom and A.J.I. Jones, editors, Action, Logic and Social Theory. Acta Philosophica Fennica, Vol. 38. 1985.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC