Courtney, R. #Some Informal Comments About Integrity and the IntegrityWorkshop. " Proc. of the Invitational Workshop on Data Integrity, #Ruthberg, Z.G. and Polk, W.T., editors#, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Special Publication 500-168, September 1989, section A.1, pages 1-18.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....Special Publication 500 168, September 1989, section A.4, pages 114. TERMINOLOGY, CRITERIA AND SYSTEM ARCHITECTURES FOR DATA INTEGRITY Ravi Sandhu Department of Computer and Information Science The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210 Abstract. In response to the strawman document [9] we propose that trust be treated as synonymous with integrity rather than synonymous with confidence. We also propose that mandatory controls be taken to mean controls based on properties of the object and or the subject. Label based mandatory controls are then a special case of this more general ....

....if the terminology suggested here needs modification and refinement, as it almost surely will. Our first topic concerns basic terminology for which we have specific proposals regarding trust and mandatory controls. For the most part we agree with the positions argued in the strawman document [9] for this workshop. The document is a significant contribution to our understanding of integrity and lays the foundation for productive debate in future. However we suggest that trust be treated as synonymous with integrity rather than synonymous with confidence. We believe the same arguments used ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

Courtney, R.H. "Some Informal Comments About Integrity and the Integrity Workshop." These proceedings.

....Systems Engineering George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia 22030 4444, USA email: sandhu isse.gmu.edu Abstract This paper compares five definitions of data integrity, and shows how they can be ordered in an increasingly restrictive sequence. The most general of these, due to Courtney and Ware [6], is based on the concept of expectation of data quality: data has integrity to the extent that its quality meets, or exceeds, the quality requirements that users expect of it. This definition incorporates liveness requirements, whereas the others only address safety requirements. The second and ....

....and system software does not malfunction. System integrity will be briefly discussed towards the end of the paper. The five definitions of data integrity discussed in this paper are as follows. ffl The most general definition, which we call the data quality definition, is due to Courtney and Ware [6]. It is based on the concept of expectation of data quality: data has integrity to the extent that its quality meets, or exceeds, the quality requirements that users expect of it. The Courtney Ware definition is the only one to incorporate liveness requirements. 3 For example, the timeliness of ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

Courtney, R. "Some Informal Comments About Integrity and the Integrity Workshop. " Proc. of the Invitational Workshop on Data Integrity, (Ruthberg, Z.G. and Polk, W.T., editors), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Special Publication 500-168, September 1989, section A.1, pages 1-18.

No context found.

Courtney, R. #Some Informal Comments About Integrity and the IntegrityWorkshop. " Proc. of the Invitational Workshop on Data Integrity, #Ruthberg, Z.G. and Polk, W.T., editors#, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Special Publication 500-168, September 1989, section A.1, pages 1-18.

No context found.

COUR89 ________ Courtney, R. H., "Some Informal Comments About Integrity and the Integrity Workshop," Report of the Invitational Workshop on Data Integrity, NIST Special Publication 500-168, pp. A.1.1-A.1.1 8, NIST, January 1989.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC