Moran, T. P., van Melle, W., & Chiu, P. (1998). Spatial interpretation of domain objects integrated into a freeform electronic whiteboard. Proceedings of UIST'98. Home/Search Document Details and Download
Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Fluid Interaction with High-resolution Wall-size Displays - Guimbretire, Stone, Winograd (2001) (14 citations) (Correct)
....images, stroke sheets, and VNC sheets, and create a snapshot of it. This makes it easy to use VNC to browse or generate information of interest, and then stick results on the wall. 4. 3 Containers In a stroke oriented system for whiteboard like use, structures can be inferred from stroke geometry [13, 19, 20, 23, 24]. For a wall interaction metaphor with mixed materials, we use automatically interpreted structure at the lower level (e.g. inferring that a collection of strokes is a character string) but use explicit structuring with containers for higher level structures such as lists and graphs. A ....
Moran, T., Van Melle, B., and Chiu, P. Spatial Interpretation of Domain Objects Integrated into a Freefrom Electronic Whiteboard. In Proc. UIST '98, pp.175-184.
Tailorable Domain Objects as Meeting Tools for an.. - Moran, van Melle, Chiu (1998) (12 citations) Self-citation (Moran Van melle Chiu) (Correct)
.... such as containment, location, relative position, and linkage on a freeform whiteboard environment. For example, a LinkedSum object is shown in Figure 3b, which adds together the durations of Tasks linked to it. More details about the mechanisms of spatial computation are presented in [14]. Note that computations based on spatial relations interpret the significance of the spatial arrangement of objects on the board and encode them as values of object properties. A better example of this is the assignee property of Task objects, which is computed dynamically by finding a Label ....
....simply taps on a project object to select it and drag it up or down. When released, the objects will adjust (opening and closing space) to keep it a neat list. The annotations move with the objects, because the implicit structure mechanisms in Tivoli work with all graphic objects on the board (see [14] for details) It is sometimes useful to sort the projects. An up down gesture on any field of a project causes the project list to be sorted according to that field. This sorting is animated so the users can better comprehend the action; and, again, the annotations are sorted with the project ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Moran, T. P., van Melle, W., & Chiu, P. (1998). Spatial interpretation of domain objects integrated into a freeform electronic whiteboard. Proceedings of UIST'98.
Flatland: New Dimensions in Office Whiteboards - Mynatt, Igarashi, Edwards.. (21 citations) (Correct)
No context found.
Moran, T.P., Chiu, P., & van Melle, W. Spatial interpretation of domain objects integrated into a freeform electronic whiteboard. To be published in the Proceedings of UIST `98. New York: ACM.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC