| Simari, G. R. and R. P. Loui (1992). A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artificial Intelligence 53, 125--157. |
....Bondarenko et al. s system since no restrictions are imposed on the internal structures of the arguments or the nodes in an inference graph. However, we will embed Pollock s system into the formalism proposed in [1] There are two reasons that we wish to do so: i) it has been argued elsewhere [11], Pollock has taken his research in a direction which is too general for AI s uses; and (ii) Bondarenko et al. s system has several well de ned (and well understood) semantics and has close connections with most major frameworks in non monotonic reasoning . 4.1 The Translation To de ne the ....
Simari, G.R., Loui, R.P. (1992) A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation Arti cial Intelligence (53) pp125-157
No context found.
G. Simari and R. Loui. A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 53:125--157, 1992.
No context found.
G. R. Simari and R. P. Loui. A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 53:125--157, 1992.
No context found.
G. Simari and R. Loui. A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Art. Intelligence, 53:125--157, 1992.
No context found.
Guillermo R. Simari and Ronald P. Loui. A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 53:125--157, 1992.
No context found.
Simari, G.R., Loui, R.P.: A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Artificial Intelligence 53 (1992) 125--157
No context found.
Simari, Guillermo R., & Loui, Ronald P. (1992). A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Artificial intelligence, 53, 125--157.
No context found.
Simari, G. R., and Loui, R. P. 1992. A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Artificial Intelligence 53:125--157.
No context found.
G. R. Simari and R. P. Loui. A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Articial Intelligence, 53: 125-157, 1992.
No context found.
Guillermo R. Simari and Ronald P. Loui. A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 53:125--157, 1992.
No context found.
SIMARI G. R., LOUI R. P., "A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation", Artificial Intelligence, vol. 53, 1992, p. 125-157.
No context found.
Simari, G. and Loui, R. A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Art. Intelligence, 53:125--157.
No context found.
G. Simari and R. Loui. A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Art. Intelligence, 53:125--157, 1992.
No context found.
Simari,G.R., and Loui,R.P., 1992, A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation, in Articial Intelligence, 53: 125-157.
No context found.
Guillermo R. Simari and Ron P. Loui. A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 53:125--157, 1992.
No context found.
G. Simari and R. Loui. A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 53:125--157, 1992.
No context found.
Simari, G.R., Loui, R.P.: A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Artificial Intelligence 53 (1992) 125--157
....to Poole s Rules and A Lemma of Simari Loui R. Loui K. Stiefvater Department of Computer Science Washington University St. Louis Abstract. This note corrects a lemma in the recent paper [1] of one of the authors by first correcting problems with Poole s rule for specificity of arguments. It also responds to the criticism of Touretzky, et al. 9] As noted as Simari Loui [1] went to press, the computationally most important lemma of the article is wrong. It states that checking ....
....of Computer Science Washington University St. Louis Abstract. This note corrects a lemma in the recent paper [1] of one of the authors by first correcting problems with Poole s rule for specificity of arguments. It also responds to the criticism of Touretzky, et al. 9] As noted as Simari Loui [1] went to press, the computationally most important lemma of the article is wrong. It states that checking specificity is equivalent to checking that the antecedents of the less specific theory can be derived from the antecedents of the more specific theory. This is not even true for the system ....
Simari, G. and R. Loui. "A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation," Artificial Intelligence 52, 1992.
No context found.
Simari, G. R. and R. P. Loui (1992). A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artificial Intelligence 53, 125--157.
No context found.
Simari, G.R., Loui, R.P.: A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artif. Intell. 53(2-3) (1992) 125--157
No context found.
G. Simari and R. Loui, "A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 53, pp. 125--157, 1992.
No context found.
G. Simari and R. Loui, `A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation', Art. Intelligence, 53, 125--157, (1992).
No context found.
G. Simari and R. Loui. A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 53:125-- 157, 1992.
No context found.
G Simari and R Loui. A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 53:125--157, 1992.
No context found.
Guillermo R. Simari, Ronald Prescott Loui (1992) A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Arti cial Intelligence 53(2-3) pp125157 .
First 50 documents Next 50
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC