| W. Fenner, L. Berc, R. Frederick, and S. McCanne, "RTP encapsulation of JPEG-compressed video," Work in Progress, Internet Engineering Task Force, Mar. 1995. |
....we used the publicly available audio (VAT) and video (VIC) tools which were modified to receive data on multiple multicast addresses (and hence receive multiple layers) All the audio and video data is encapsulated end to end in RTP [9] format. The video packets are in the format as described in [4], and the audio packets use the format as suggested in [10] The audio and video tools in both the domains communicated using the gateway (see Figure 5(b) which implements the state diagrams mentioned in Section 5.1. 8 Issues for Further Research The design that has been described takes into ....
W. Fenner, L. Berc, R. Fredrick, and S. McCane. RTP Encapsulation of JPEG-compressed video. Internet draft, Work in progress, November 1995.
....and multiple participants. The details of the algorithms used can be found in [Sha95, SY96] The main features of the HMC enhancements to the ATM signaling are summarized in Table 2. Finally, in our HMC implementation, data is transported by using RTP [SCFJ96] The RTP packets are encapsulated [FBFM95]as AAL protocol data units (PDUs) Data from the source to the receivers is carried by a distribution tree as shown in Figure 1(a) The distribution tree consists of as many point to multipoint VCs as the number of layers. Each stream (even if the streams are from the same source) has a separate ....
....data on the multicast address (determined from the layer to multicast address map) and the port number (see Figure 4) 4.2.4 Encapsulation and De encapsulation All the audio and video data is encapsulated end to end in RTP [SCFJ96] format. The video packets are in the format as described in [FBFM95] and the audio packets use the format as suggested in [Sch96] The packet size is chosen not to exceed the MTU (Maximum Transmission Unit) on the path. Each RTP packet is sent over the ATM domain as an AAL PDU and over the IP domain as a single UDP IP packet. 4.3 Discussion We have described the ....
W. Fenner, L. Berc, R. Fredrick, and S. McCane. RTP Encapsulation of JPEG-compressed video. Work in progress, November 1995.
....badges [20] RTP is described in an application independent protocol specification [21] while application specific issues are dealt with in separate profiles. Currently, there is one profile for audio and video applications [22] Other drafts describe how encodings like H. 261 [23] motion JPEG [24], MPEG or Cell B [25] are to be encapsulated within RTP packets. To avoid misunderstandings, it may help to clear up some of the things that RTP does not attempt to do. RTP has no notion of a connection; it may operate over either connection oriented or connectionless lower layer protocols. It has ....
W. Fenner, L. Berc, R. Frederick, and S. McCanne, "RTP encapsulation of JPEG-compressed video," Internet Draft, Kaman Sciences, Nov. 1994. Work in progress.
....and fed back implementation experience to the design process. Moreover, our experience implementing the RTP payload specification for H. 261 led to an improved scheme based on macroblock level fragmentation, which resulted in a revised protocol [44] Finally, the RTP payload specification for JPEG [13] evolved from a vic implementation. In the next section, we describe the design approach of the MBone tools. We then discuss the essentials of the vic network architecture. The network architecture shapes the software architecture, which is discussed in the following section. Finally, we discuss ....
FENNER, W., BERC, L., FREDERICK, R., AND MCCANNE, S. RTP Encapsulation of JPEG-compressed Video. Internet Engineering Task Force, Audio-Video Transport Working Group, Mar. 1995. Internet Draft expires 12/1/95.
No context found.
W. Fenner, L. Berc, R. Frederick, and S. McCanne, "RTP encapsulation of JPEG-compressed video," Work in Progress, Internet Engineering Task Force, Mar. 1995.
No context found.
W. Fenner, L. Berc, R. Frederick, and S. McCanne, "RTP Encapsulation of JPEG Compressed Video," Internet Engineering Task Force, Audio-Video Transport Working Group (March 1995). (Internet draft)
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC