Tauge-Sutcliffe, J. (1992). Measuring the informativeness of a retrieval process, Proceedings of the Fifteen Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 23-36). Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Relevance Feedback using Support Vector Machines - Drucker, Shahraray, Gibbon (2001) (2 citations) (Correct)
....performance in comparison to TF or TF IDF. Recall that we would prefer not to use TF IDF because it requires two passes to calculate IDF. 4. Performance Metrics. There are too many ways to assess the effectiveness of the feedback process to discuss here in detail. References are Lewis (1995) Tauge Sutcliffe (1992), Saracevic (1975) Mizzaro (1997) and Korfhage (1997) However, traditionally recall and precision are used. Let R be the number of relevant documents in the collection, Rel n be the number of relevant documents actually retrieved in a feedback iteration and N be the total number of documents ....
Tauge-Sutcliffe, J. (1992). Measuring the informativeness of a retrieval process, Proceedings of the Fifteen Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 23-36).
Event Tracking - Allan, Lavrenko, Papka (1998) (Correct)
....be evaluated. This effect means that results for one value of N t should not be assumed valid for other values. 3.2 Evaluation measures Information Retrieval systems are generally evaluated on the basis of ranked recall and precision, 10, 17] though numerous other measures have been proposed. [8, 19] Information Filtering systems are evaluated on a wider range of measures, including set based measures and various utility measures, though no particular measure has settled out as preferred. 12] In the TDT setting, we have chosen to measure a system s effectiveness primarily by the miss and ....
Jean Tague-Sutcliffe. Measuring the informativeness of a retrieval process. In Proceedings of SIGIR '92, pages 23--36, 1992.
On-line New Event Detection and Tracking - Allan, Papka, Lavrenko (1998) (29 citations) (Correct)
....a larger number of judged events, as well as the audio stream and closed captioning for all broadcast sources. 3.1 Evaluation measures Information Retrieval systems are generally evaluated on the basis of ranked recall and precision, 10, 18] though numerous other measures have been proposed. [20] Information Filtering systems are evaluated on a wider range of measures, including set based measures and various utility measures, though no particular measure has settled out as preferred. 14] In the TDT setting, we have chosen to measure a system s effectiveness primarily by the miss (false ....
J. Tague-Sutcliffe. Measuring the informativeness of a retrieval process. In Proceedings of SIGIR '92, pages 23--36, 1992.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC