Y. Ishikawa. Reflection Facilities and Realistic Programming. SIGPLAN Notices, 26(8):101--110, August 1991.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....class structure and functionalities. In this sense, we reject the inheritance mechanism as a built in process. On the contrary we propose a reification of such a mechanism by means of inter object dependencies. This leads to opening up our language, so the work presented is in the same line of [28, 8, 18, 23, 30]. Our language, named flo 1 , is an open objectoriented programming language in the sense of clos s mop[25] It extends the object oriented paradigms by integrating dependency management. flo is based on reification of dependencies (links) control of message passing (thanks to behavioral ....

Y. Ishikawa. Reflection Facilities and Realistic Programming. SIGPLAN Notices, 26(8):101--110, August 1991.

....by a method name led by in this paper. 3.2 Definition of Models The definition of Operation, Statistics, DE, Migration models are shown with the notation of AL 1 D language. The Resource and System models are not described in this paper. Those models were described in the previous our paper[2]. 3.2.1 Operation Model In the Operation Model, a base level object is represented by message queue, instance variables, method tables, name tables, state of object, evaluation stack, continuation, sender object and template of future object. The following example shows the definition of a meta ....

Yutaka Ishikawa. Reflection Facilities and Realistic Programming. Sigplan Notice, 26(8), August 1991.

....for his her application. However, when the application is complex, the computational reflection allows one to reason and to redefine the dynamic behavior of computation within the language framework 2 . Thus, the work presented in this paper is in the same line as [Mae87, Coi88, Fer89, Ish91, Kic92] The metaobject protocol approach, is based on the idea that one can and should open languages up , allowing users to adjust the design and implementation to suit their particular needs. KdRB91] To implement the mechanism of dependency consistency management, in such a way that ....

Yutaka Ishikawa. Reflection Facilities and Realistic Programming. SIGPLAN Notices, 26(8):101--110, August 1991.

....object and its metaobject must explicitly synchronize their activities in order to maintain the causal connection. The metaobjects can be extended to be multiple, that is, each object could have multiple meta objects that captures the certain view of its computation. For example, in language AL 1[52] and AL 1 D[88] each base level objects has associated with it six different meta objects, depending on the models they provide they are: operation, resource, DE, migration, statistics, and system. Each model can also be considered to provide different restricted and consistent views in the ....

Yutaka Ishikawa. Reflection facilities and realistic programming. SIGPLAN Notices, 26(8):101--110, August 1991.

....as computing power. The metalevel of ABCL R2 is constructed by concurrent objects and their scheduling policy is not defined exactly by its CCSR. In RbCl, the scheduling policy within each node is defined by the metalevel, and therefore the user can control the system behavior more precisely. AL 1 [1] is an object oriented concurrent language. AL 1 is based on the multi model reflection framework. AL 1 provides multiple CCSRs that are suitable for various purposes in modifying the behavior of the interpreter, resource management, etc. Although RbCl provides only one CCSR, it embodies all the ....

Ishikawa, Y., "Reflection Facilities and Realistic Programming, " SIGPLAN Notices, Vol.26, No.8, Aug.1991, pp.101110.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC