Bratman,M.E., (1990), "What is Intention?", in Intentions in Communication (eds P.R.Cohen, J.Morgan & M.E.Pollack), pp 15-31. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Commitments and Conventions: The Foundation of Coordination in.. - Jennings (1993) (123 citations) (Correct)
....are finite, and also because there are often constraints imposed by the environment, an agent is limited in the number and type of commitments it can make 10 . For this reason, an agent s commitments should, as far as it is aware, be both internally consistent and consistent with its beliefs (Bratman, 1990). The former means that an individual s commitments should not conflict with one another for example an agent should not pledge to simultaneously perform two goals which both require the same non shareable resource. The latter means that if an agent s intended actions are executed in a world in ....
Bratman, M E, 1990. "What is Intention?", In: P R Cohen, J Morgan and M E Pollack (eds.) Intentions in Communication, MIT Press, pp 15-33.
Grate: A General Framework For Cooperative Problem.. - Jennings, Mamdani.. (1992) (6 citations) (Correct)
....64 Priority: 10 Status: ACTIVATED Outcome: FAULT HYPOTHESES) Evaluative Knowledge (eg time to complete task, intention end time) 8. WHILE WHEN p DO q WHEN r means while p is true do q; when (if) p becomes false do r 9. Intentions have been used to describe many different concepts (eg [36] [37], 38] however within this context they refer to a desired state without reference to how it can be reached. There is a fine distinction between plans and intentions: plans correspond to recipes for performing particular actions or for achieving particular goal states and are known by an ....
BRATMAN,M.E.: "What is Intention?", Intentions in Communication, (eds P.R.Cohen, J.Morgan & M.E.Pollack), pp 15-33, (MIT Press 1990).
On Being Responsible - Jennings (1992) (27 citations) (Correct)
....sufficient for obtaining joint action. JPG s only specify that agents have a common desire to reach a target state, they do not specify how to reach this state. Agreeing upon a means of reaching the state is nearly as impor 2. Intentions have been ascribed a variety of differing meanings (eg [3], 4] 24] within this context they specify a desired or target state, without consideration of how that state is to be attained. tant as the desire to reach the state itself. Therefore although NSA and RA may be able to agree that they want to produce a restoration plan together, unless they ....
M.E.Bratman, (1990), "What is Intention?" Intentions in Communication, (eds P.R.Cohen, J.Morgan & M.E.Pollack), pp 15-33, MIT Press
DA-SoC: A Testbed for Modelling Distribution Automation.. - Hägg, Ygge, al. (1994) (2 citations) (Correct)
....is a project in the SoC framework. In SoC we pursue R D in three parallel strands: theoretical foundations, generic technologies, and applications. Theoretical foundations includes, as background, work done elsewhere. There is work on belief, desire, and intention from a philosophical perspective [Bratman90]. A formalization of an agent s rational behaviour in modal logic is given by [Cohen90] An extension of those ideas to include the interaction between agents, especially in a real time environment is given by [Rao92] Furthermore, the proposal of Agent Oriented Programming (AOP) Shoham91, ....
Bratman M. E.: "What Is Intention?", in Intentions in Communication, MIT Press, ISBN 0-262-03150-7.
Rhetorical Relations, Action and Intentionality in Conversation - David Traum (Correct)
....monitoring them for desired effect and repairing or replanning in case of a problem. Plan recognition is the process of reasoning about an agent s mental state (including intentions, beliefs, and goals) based on observed actions in context. Intentions are commitments towards a course of action. [Bratman, 1990] discusses three roles that intention plays in deliberative behavior: serving as a motivation for planning, a filter of admissibility on plans and further intentions, and a controller of conduct, motivating execution monitoring and repair and replanning when necessary. Rhetorical relations are ....
Michael E. Bratman, "What Is Intention?," In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. E. Pollack, editors, Intentions in Communication. MIT Press, 1990.
The Impact of Heterogeneity on Cooperating Agents - Roda, Jennings, Mamdani (1991) (3 citations) (Correct)
No context found.
Bratman,M.E., (1990), "What is Intention?", in Intentions in Communication (eds P.R.Cohen, J.Morgan & M.E.Pollack), pp 15-31.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC