| D.M. Tilbrook and P.R.H. Place, "Tools for the Maintenance and Installation of a Large Software Distribution," Proc. EUUG Summer Conference, Florence, Italy, 1986. |
.... Make, UNIX wouldn tbewhat it is today.However, inthe last years a number of attempts have been made to improve the program in a number of ways, complete reimplementations have been done, and quite a lot of criticism has (respectfully,though) been expressed, of what is considered weaknesses of Make [2, 3, 7, 8, 10, 14, 16]. Often, the discontent is related to some kind of specialized new task that Make is put to work on, which it wasn toriginally designed to perform. So, this kind of criticism can also be interpreted as some compliment for a very flexible tool. In [16] it is argued that one of Make smore serious ....
....weaknesses of Make [2, 3, 7, 8, 10, 14, 16] Often, the discontent is related to some kind of specialized new task that Make is put to work on, which it wasn toriginally designed to perform. So, this kind of criticism can also be interpreted as some compliment for a very flexible tool. In [16] it is argued that one of Make smore serious drawbacks lies in the lack of standards and differences between versions. Makefiles are frequently written in an ad hoc fashion rather than carefully designed, as they should be. An ambivalent issue about Make is that one tends to use it without having ....
D.M. Tilbrook and P.R.H. Place, "Tools for the Maintenance and Installation of a Large Software Distribution," Proceedings of the USENIX Technical Conference and Exhibition,pp. 223-237, USENIX Association, Atlanta, Ga., June
No context found.
D.M. Tilbrook and P.R.H. Place, "Tools for the Maintenance and Installation of a Large Software Distribution," Proc. EUUG Summer Conference, Florence, Italy, 1986.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC