| Paul Francis. Comparison of geographical and provider-rooted Internet addressing. In Proceedings of INET '94, June 1994. |
.... contain information describing how many usage units (for a capacity filter) each packet represents, or a monetary per packet charge, or whatever other information is needed for the provider provider information (as in the current IPv6 proposal [12] then these tables are especially simple (see [15] for more information) Moreover, if the provider networks are small enough, one set fee for all intraprovider packets and another fixed fee for all interprovider packets might be sufficient. Multicast packets pose more of a challenge. A multicast address is merely a logical name, and by itself ....
Paul Francis. Comparison of geographical and provider-rooted Internet addressing. In Proceedings of INET '94, June 1994.
....relatively trivial to design the distributed algorithms needed to construct and maintain these tables. 14 If addresses encode geographic information (as in Deering s recent proposal [12] or provider information (as in the current IPv6 proposal [13] then these tables are especially simple (see [16] for more information) Moreover, if the provider networks are small enough, one set fee for all intraprovider packets and another fixed fee for all interprovider packets might be sufficient. Multicast packets pose more of a challenge. A multicast address is merely a logical name, and by itself ....
Paul Francis. Comparison of geographical and provider-rooted Internet addressing. In Proceedings of INET '94, June 1994.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC