| J. C. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating receive livelock in an interrupt-driven kernel. In Proc. USENIX 1996. |
....operating system (OS) and device drivers. Since OS code is not included in our application model, a manual analysis is required to model the packet arrival mechanism. The mapping must also indicate whether packet arrival is implemented with interrupts, polling, a hybrid interrupt polling scheme [10], or special hardware supporting a scheme like active messages [5] The Click system itself, when running in kernel mode on Linux, uses polling to examine DMA descriptors (a data structure shared by the CPU and the device for moving packets. This issue is of paramount importance in real systems, ....
J. C. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating receive livelock in an interrupt-driven kernel. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 15(3):217--252, 1997.
....In comparison, Neptune focuses on achieving efficient resource utilization and providing service differentiation for cluster based services in which contents are dynamically generated and aggregated. Recent advances in OS research have developed approaches to provide QoS support at OS kernel level [14, 20, 30, 62, 73, 79]. Our work can be enhanced by those studies to support hard QoS guarantees and service differentiation at finer granularities. The concept of service quality in this resource management framework refers to only the service response time. Service quality can have various application specific ....
J. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating Receive Livelock in an Interrupt-driven Kernel. In Proc. of USENIX Annual Technical Conf., San Diego, CA, January 1996.
....operating system (OS) and device drivers. Since OS code is not included in the application model, a manual analysis is required to model the packet arrival mechanism. The mapping must also indicate whether packet arrival is implemented with interrupts, polling, a hybrid interrupt polling scheme [10], or special hardware supporting a scheme like active messages [5] The Click system itself, when running in kernel mode on Linux, uses polling to examine DMA descriptors (a data structure shared by the CPU and the device for moving packets. This issue is of paramount importance in real systems, ....
J. C. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating receive livelock in an interrupt-driven kernel. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 15(3):217--252, 1997.
No context found.
J. C. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating receive livelock in an interrupt-driven kernel. In Proc. USENIX 1996.
No context found.
J. C. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating Receive Livelock in an Interrupt-Driven Kernel. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 15(3), 1997.
No context found.
Jeffrey C. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating receive livelock in an interrupt-driven kernel. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 15(3):217-- 252, 1997.
No context found.
J. C. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating receive livelock in an interrupt-driven kernel. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 15(3):217--252, 1997.
No context found.
Jeffrey C. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating receive livelock in an interrupt-driven kernel. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 15(3):217--252, August 1997.
No context found.
J. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating Receive Livelock in an Interrupt-driven Kernel. In Proc. of USENIX Annual Technical Conf., San Diego, CA, January 1996.
No context found.
J. Mogul and K. Ramakrisnan, Eliminating Receive Livelock in an Interrupt-Driven Kernel, Proceedings of 1996 Usenix Technical Conference, 1996.
No context found.
J. Mogul and K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating receive livelock in an interrupt-driven kernel. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 15(3):217--252, 1997.
No context found.
J. C. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan, "Eliminating Receive Livelock in an Interrupt-Driven Kernel," Transactions on Computer Systems, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 217--252, August 1997.
No context found.
J. C. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating receive livelock in an interrupt-driven kernel. In Proc. of the 1996.
No context found.
J. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating Receive Livelock in an Interrupt-driven Kernel. In Proc. of USENIX Annual Technical Conf., San Diego, CA, Jan. 1996. Lingkun Chu et al.
No context found.
Jeffrey C. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan, "Eliminating Receive Livelock in an Interrupt-Driven Kernel," ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 217--252, August 1997.
No context found.
J. C. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating Receive Livelock in an Interrupt-Driven Kernel. Research Report 95/8, Digital Equipment Corporation Western Research Laboratory, Dec. 1995.
No context found.
J. Mogul and K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating Receive Livelock in an Interrupt-Driven Kernel. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 217-252, August 1997.
No context found.
J. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating receive livelock in an interrupt-driven kernel. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 15(3):217--252, 1997.
No context found.
J.C.Mogul and K.K.Ramakrishnan. Eliminating Receive Livelock in an Interrupt-Driven Kernel. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 15(3), August 1997.
No context found.
J. C. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating Receive Livelock in an Interrupt-driven Kernel. In Proceedings of the USENIX 1996.
No context found.
Jeffrey C. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating receive livelock in an interrupt-driven kernel. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 15(3):217--252, August 1997.
No context found.
J. C. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating receive livelock in an interrupt-driven kernel. In Proc. USENIX 1996.
No context found.
J. C. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating receive livelock in an interrupt-driven kernel. In Proc. USENIX 1996.
No context found.
J. C. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishan. Eliminating receive livelock in an interrupt-driven kernel. In Proc. of USENIX Annual Technical Conference, January 1996.
No context found.
Jeffrey C. Mogul and K. K. Ramakrishnan. Eliminating receive livelock in an interrupt-driven kernel. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 15(3):217--252, 1997.
First 50 documents Next 50
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC