H. A. Simon, Reason in human affairs. Stanford University Press, 1983. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
On the Emergence of Exchange and Mediation in a Production Economy - Dawid (1998) (Correct)
....assume that all agents have rational expectations and know their optimal decision but rather consider a learning model where agents are boundedly rational and slowly acquire the experience and knowledge to improve their performance. It has been argued in several places [see e.g. Sargent (1993) or Simon (1983)] that the relaxation of the very demanding rationality and knowledge assumptions underlying general equilibrium theory might allow new insights and the study of more realistic economic models. We adopt this point of view here and study the behavior on the path towards equilibrium rather than ....
Simon, H.A., 1983, Reasons in Human Affairs (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.).
SHARING INFORMATION IN THIRD WORLD PLANNING AGENCIES.. - By Michael Batty (Correct)
....we assume here that the insights we have from past studies are becoming less relevant to current concerns, these insights reflect the fact that systems are continually changing and that they represent views of a phenomenon which in turn have been instrumental in changing that phenomenon. Herbert Simon (1983) argued a decade ago that in management science for example, it was extremely difficult to study the impact of new management methods on management practice for management practice itself was continually changing in response to these new methods. New professionals trained in these new techniques ....
Simon, H. A. (1983) Reason in Human Affairs, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Non-Axiomatic Reasoning System - Exploring the Essence of.. - Wang (1995) (Correct)
....ideas: Type II rationality (Good, 1983) Type II rationality is defined as the recommendation to maximize expected utility allowing for the cost of theorizing. It involves the recognition that judgments can be revised, leading at best to consistency of mature judgments. Bounded rationality (Simon, 1983): Within the behavioral model of bounded rationality, one doesn t have to make choices that are infinitely 2. Theoretical Foundations 17 deep in time, that encompass the whole range of human values, and in which each problem is interconnected with all the other problems in the world. Minimal ....
Simon, H. (1983). Reason in Human Affairs. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.
On the Working Definition of Intelligence - Wang (1995) (Correct)
....ideas: Simon s bounded rationality: Within the behavioral model of bounded rationality, one doesn t have to make choices that are infinitely deep in time, that encompass the whole range of human values, and in which each problem is interconnected with all the other problems in the world. [35] Cherniak s minimal rationality: We are in the finitary predicament of having fixed limits on our cognitive resources, in particular, on memory capacity and computing time. 5] Russell and Wefald s limited rationality: Intelligence was intimately linked to the ability to succeed as far as ....
H. Simon. Reason in Human Affairs. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1983.
Ambiguit a ed Autonomia negli agenti software - Matteo Bonifacio Diego (2002) (Correct)
No context found.
H. A. Simon, Reason in human affairs. Stanford University Press, 1983.
Towards a Model of Goal Autonomous Agents - Bonifacio Bouquet Ferrario (Correct)
No context found.
H. A. Simon. Reason in human affairs. Stanford University press, 1983.
Artificial Intelligence And Human Decision Making - Pomerol (1995) (6 citations) (Correct)
No context found.
Simon H.-A., 1983, Reason in Human Affairs, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC