C. A. Fuchs and A. Peres, \Quantum Theory Needs No `Interpretation'," Phys. Today 53(3), 70 (2000); \Quantum Theory { Interpretation, Formulation, Inspiration: Fuchs and Peres Reply," 53(9), 14 (2000). Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Unknown Quantum States: The Quantum de Finetti Representation - Caves, Fuchs, Schack (2002) (1 citation) Self-citation (Fuchs) (Correct)
....signi cance of this point. I. INTRODUCTION What is a quantum state Since the earliest days of quantum theory, the predominant answer has been that the quantum state is a representation of the observer s knowledge of a system [1] In and of itself, the quantum state has no objective reality [2]. The authors hold this information based view quite rmly [3,4] Despite its association with the founders of quantum theory, however, holding this view does not require a concomitant belief that there is nothing left to learn in quantum foundations. It is quite the opposite in fact: Only by ....
C. A. Fuchs and A. Peres, \Quantum Theory Needs No `Interpretation'," Phys. Today 53(3), 70 (2000); \Quantum Theory { Interpretation, Formulation, Inspiration: Fuchs and Peres Reply," 53(9), 14 (2000).
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC