A. Glass. Creating socially conscious agents: Decision-making in the context of group commitments, 1999. Senior Honors Thesis, Harvard College, Cambridge, MA.

 Home/Search   Document Details and Download   Summary   Related Articles  

This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Learning and Decision-Making for Intention Reconciliation - Das, Grosz, Pfeffer (2002)   (Correct)

....The agent typically learns a policy, a mapping from states to actions that specifies the action the agent should take in any given state. Most work in reinforcement learning uses the Markov Decision Process This good guy e#ect, modeled using brownie points is described in detail by Glass [4] and Glass and Grosz [5] MDP) framework. The Markov property states that the probability of a transition from one state to another depends solely on the current state and action, not on the history of actions an agent has taken or states it has visited [8] Stochastic games, also known as ....

....intervals. 4. 3 Homogeneous Communities of Agents Using These experiments investigate the behavior of communities of agents in which all the agents use the same value of v for their cuto# function CF(v) Agents using a lower value of v will be less socially responsible in the sense used by Glass [4], that is, they will tend to default more on their group commitments, because it requires a lower incentive for them to be willing to renege on the group. Figure 1 shows this e#ect clearly. The percentage of de 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 Group Task Income Cutoff Value v Never ....

A. Glass. Creating socially conscious agents: Decision-making in the context of group commitments, 1999. Senior Honors Thesis, Harvard College, Cambridge, MA.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC